Using the timeline of events, Newsweek’s Michael Isikoff and Mark Hosenball dispel the notion of criminal intent and guilt on this Joseph Wilson “leak” Quote: “‘Leakgate’ may be little more than a bumbling effort to slam a critic.... [T]he prospect that a senior administration official goofed big time is gaining fast currency among those familiar with the events in the current Washington leak controversy.” They go on to say that the “senior administration...

How can you write a book, if you don?t have an ending? How can he write this book with all the details if he doesn't know who did it? Is it safe to assume he knows? Is it safe to assume Joseph Wilson knows who did the leaking? If he's going to go out and write a book about this, he obviously knows the answer to the ending. And if he does, why does he know? Don't say I'm leveling accusations, folks. I'm just throwing out things for you to think about.
But I still want to know, despite all...

The new theory is that the official quoted by the Washington Post ?simply got it wrong,? and that the calls to reporters relaying the information about Wilson?s wife simply repeated information from Novak?s original column! Isikoff and Hosenball write that the calls ?were placed as part of a blundering effort to persuade journalists to concentrate on Wilson's presumed lack of credentials as a critic of pre-Iraq war intelligence rather than the substance of his critique. New evidence for this view...