Dittos, 

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Back Home Button
The Rush Limbaugh Show
Excellence in Broadcasting
RSS Icon
ADVERTISEMENT

Archives

Browse by Date:

Morning Update: Page 3

Change has come to “Page 3” of The Sun, the iconic British tabloid. For 45 years, The Sun’s Page 3 featured topless models. Now, the models are wearing bras or bikinis. The AP reports, “Feminists are rejoicing at the disappearance of bare breasts.”

Why I Didn't Watch the Obama State of the Union Show

RUSH: I never thought the day would come where I did what I did last night. I did not watch. I did not turn it on. I didn't have the State of the Union on with the sound down. I didn't have a channel on where you could see the State of the Union. I today am a proud member of the low-information crowd... I literally had no interest, because I knew what was gonna be said, and more than that, I knew how it was going to be said.  I knew that I was gonna be insulted. I knew the things I believe in are gonna be insulted, with a gloating air about it, and I just didn't want to put up with it. 

The NFL's Big Ball Problem

RUSH: The National Football League has a problem.  People are laughing about this Deflategate thing up in New England.  But it's a problem.  It's a problem because of the integrity of the game.  And that is something that the league cannot be flippant or frivolous about.  

Obama's Tax Hikes on "the Rich" Would Eliminate Middle Class 529 College Saving Plans

CALLER:  Well, let me tell you, the Bush tax cuts back in 2006 made college 529 plans totally tax-exempt. So long as you put the money in it, it grew tax-exempt, you take that money out, you pay for your kids' college, it was tax-exempt.  Now Barack Obama wants to get rid of that Bush tax cut for the middle class, and when you take that 529 money out, that's how he's gonna pay for community colleges.  It's buried in the plan. Forbes has an article about it.

New York Magazine Mainstreams Incest

RUSH: Back in August of 2005, on the subject of gay marriage, I asked the following question:  "Where would the line be drawn, where would the liberals draw the line on right to privacy?" If you're gonna redefine marriage here, folks, then all bets are off, right?  Marriage is like anything else now in morality, individual choice, whatever you want it to be. If you can marry somebody of the same sex, can you marry two people of the same sex? Can you marry one of the opposite sex and one of the same sex and do a troika and draw straws every night or afternoon, depending on your preferences?  What limits are you willing to go for on the right to privacy?  Bigamy, polygamy, incest, where are you gonna draw the line on this once you start changing the definition of marriage?

ADVERTISEMENT

Rush 24/7 Audio/Video

Listen to the Latest Show Watch the Latest Show
Listen to the Latest Show Watch the Latest Show

original

Facebook

ADVERTISEMENT

Most Popular

EIB Features