{"id":10576,"date":"2013-12-18T19:38:03","date_gmt":"2013-12-18T19:38:03","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2013-12-18T19:38:03","modified_gmt":"2013-12-18T19:38:03","slug":"gay_community_update_libs_not_happy_happy_happy_with_phil_robertson","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/12\/18\/gay_community_update_libs_not_happy_happy_happy_with_phil_robertson\/","title":{"rendered":"Gay Community Update: Libs Not Happy, Happy, Happy with Phil Robertson"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Listen<\/a><\/p>\n

RUSH: Dadelut dadelut dadelut dadelut dadelut. That\u2019s the trumpet fanfare, folks. It hearkens back to the Grooveyard of Forgotten Favorite days on this program. And we indeed are hearkening back, turning back the hands of time. Our old friend, the late great Klaus Nomi and a gay community update. <\/p>\n

(playing of song) <\/p>\n

RUSH: Klaus Nomi, everybody! <\/p>\n

(Continued playing of song) <\/p>\n

RUSH: Let ‘er rip, Klaus. Yes, sir! Klaus Nomi! <\/p>\n

(continued playing of song) <\/p>\n

\"original\"<\/p>\n

RUSH: Yes siree, my friends, the gay community update there voiced, a vocal portrayal by Klaus Nomi. Okay, today\u2019s gay update theme comes from Phil Robertson, one of the stars of the reality show that\u2019s taken the nation by storm, Duck Dynasty. Phil Robertson, the founder of Duck Commander, recently interviewed in GQ magazine, asked about homosexuality. He said (paraphrasing), “What? I don\u2019t understand it. A vagina is more desirable than a man\u2019s anus. Why would a guy want to not use a vagina?” <\/p>\n

(continued playing of song) <\/p>\n

RUSH: He is hated about now. No, he said that. I\u2019m not making it up. <\/p>\n

(continued playing of song) <\/p>\n

RUSH: Ah, from the Grooveyard of Forgotten Favorites, Klaus Nomi. “You don\u2019t know me.” Our gay community update theme. Phil Robertson in GQ said, “It seems like, to me, a vagina — as a man — would be more desirable than a man\u00c2\u2019s anus. That\u00c2\u2019s just me. I\u00c2\u2019m just thinking: There\u00c2\u2019s more there! She\u00c2\u2019s got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes! You know what I\u00c2\u2019m saying? But hey, sin: It\u00c2\u2019s not logical, my man. It\u00c2\u2019s just not logical.”<\/p>\n

Well, that has caused an uproar out there in the gay community. The left is hysterical over these comments made by Phil Robertson. And I would just like to point out to the estimable Pierce Morgan and others that the views expressed by Phil Robertson in GQ happen to totally line up with the views of the Drive-Bys\u2019 new best friend forever, the pope. And yet the left has totally embraced the pope. But the long knives are out for Phil Robertson. <\/p>\n

Robertson further said, “Start with homosexual behavior and just morph out from there. Bestiality, sleeping around with this woman and that woman and that woman and those men. Don\u00c2\u2019t be deceived. Neither the adulterers, the idolaters, the male prostitutes, the homosexual offenders, the greedy, the drunkards, the slanderers, the swindlers — they won\u00c2\u2019t inherit the kingdom of God. Don\u00c2\u2019t deceive yourself. It\u00c2\u2019s not right.”<\/p>\n

Well, as you can well imagine, the left is hysterical, rather than just let it go. It\u2019s the Duck Dynasty guy. They\u2019re making a huge, huge deal out of it. It\u2019s outrageous. But his views, I mean, folks, they line up almost exactly with the views of the new BFF of the libs: The Catholic Church. <\/p>\n

I made a prediction some time ago that gay marriage would lead to other things. Do you remember what I said? Polygamy. I said that this would lead to that, and I wasn\u2019t the only one. Scalia, Justice Scalia has said the same thing, I think in a Supreme Court ruling in a Texas case. I, of course, El Rushbo, was not the only one. I predicted that before this is all said and done, once we\u2019ve crossed this barrier, that polygamists will have the same legal rights same-sex couples and we\u2019re then gonna redefine what a family is. <\/p>\n

Once we bust up the definition of marriage, it can then be anything anybody wants it to be. Marriage was a man and a woman, and once it\u2019s not, then it can be anything that anybody wants to lobby for, once it\u2019s been blown to smithereens. Well, a story from the Los Angeles Times: “Advocates for so-called plural marriages are applauding a ruling by a US District Court judge that struck down key segments of Utah\u2019s anti-polygamy law, saying they violated constitutional rights to privacy and religious freedom. <\/p>\n

“In a 91-page decision issued Friday, Judge Clark Waddoups effectively decriminalized polygamy in Utah, ruling that a central phrase in the state\u2019s law forbidding cohabitation with another person violated the 1st and 14th amendments. The ruling, which distinguishes between polygamy and bigamy, was the result of a lawsuit filed in 2011 by Kody Brown, star of the reality series ‘Sister Wives,\u2019 now in its fourth season on cable TV\u2019s TLC,” if you\u2019re interested.<\/p>\n

“Brown has four ‘wives\u2019 — who together have 17 children — but is legally married only to his first, Meri Brown,” and he has just been upheld. Polygamy supporters are beside themselves with thrill and delight. They\u2019re excited beyond belief because parts of the anti-polygamy law in Utah have been struck down. <\/line>