{"id":12208,"date":"2013-06-12T17:44:01","date_gmt":"2013-06-12T17:44:01","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2013-06-12T17:44:01","modified_gmt":"2013-06-12T17:44:01","slug":"did_maxine_let_the_cat_out_of_the_bag_on_democrat_data_mining_to_tip_elections","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2013\/06\/12\/did_maxine_let_the_cat_out_of_the_bag_on_democrat_data_mining_to_tip_elections\/","title":{"rendered":"Did Maxine Let the Cat Out of the Bag on Democrat Data Mining to Tip Elections?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Listen<\/a><\/p>\n

RUSH: So where are we? The individual — and this is reputed to be constitutional law, and statute law, by the way. The individual has no right in his phone number, he doesn\u2019t own it. He doesn\u2019t own the contents of the telephone calls that he makes. You don\u2019t own that, the phone company does. You have no right to it. You have no expectation of privacy, in fact, because it\u2019s not yours. <\/p>\n

The phone company owns it, and they have — this is crucial — immunity granted by the government. They have immunity from prosecution for giving it up. See, this is what bugs me. If you call Verizon, “Look, I want the phone records of my neighbor, I don\u2019t like what the guy –” they\u2019d laugh you out of the office. The government calls, “Oh, fine and dandy, here you go, and we want immunity.” Fine, you\u2019ve got it. The automatic assumption that government is entitled to everything, to run health care, to tell the oil companies how they can and can\u2019t run, to regulate everything, just bugs me. <\/p>\n

The individual is said to have no right in his phone number. The phone company is said to own the number, but the phone company can\u2019t protect it from the government because the government gets whatever it wants. And so the courts are said to be the stopgap. That\u2019s FISA. But FISA never turns any request down. But here\u2019s where it all comes together. If there\u2019s no expectation of privacy, is what we\u2019re being told. What we\u2019re being told is, “Look, you guys, you\u2019re getting all exercised over nothing here. The NSA is collecting this data.<\/a> It\u2019s not yours. Your privacy is not being violated. You don\u2019t own the number. You don\u2019t own the data.” <\/p>\n

Okay, so if there\u2019s no expectation of privacy, if we\u2019re wrong in expecting that, and if we don\u2019t own it, if there\u2019s no property right, and therefore nothing we can do, there\u2019s no civil recourse to any of this, then how can there be any judicial oversight? In other words, if you and I have no rights, no claim to anything involving the use of our telephones, then what kind of judicial oversight can there be? If we\u2019re not legally entitled to any of it, if we\u2019re not entitled to expect privacy, then how can there be judicial oversight? There\u2019s nothing to defend. There\u2019s nothing to safeguard. <\/p>\n

If there\u2019s no expectation of privacy, and if we don\u2019t own it, if there\u2019s no property right, then there\u2019s nothing we can do in the courts. So I don\u2019t know what kind of judicial oversight there is. You can say all three branches signed off on it, but where\u2019s the protection? And then you add to this that it\u2019s all to be done in secret. So we have what appears to be a nearly 100% court record in authorizing every kind of request in this regard. Meaning whenever the government asks the FISA court or any other court for access to this data, it\u2019s granted. <\/p>\n

What has been the benefit? That is a question I have. What\u2019s the benefit? What are we getting for this? Well, right here, in the UK Guardian: “NSA surveillance played little role in foiling terror plots, experts say. Obama administration says NSA data helped make arrests in two important cases.” But, in fact, in one of the cases, terrorists actually succeeded in a really horrendous attack, and the other one was pretty bogus. <\/p>\n

Here are the two cases. When somebody says, “What\u2019s the benefit for all this?” We don\u2019t own the number, we don\u2019t own the contents, we have no property right, therefore we have no expectation of privacy \u2019cause it isn\u2019t ours in the first place. There\u2019s no place we can go to seek redress if what we think is our privacy is violated. We\u2019re told there\u2019s judicial oversight because all of this has to be granted by a court. Well, it all is. Okay, so all of this data mining, what are we getting out of it, and they cite two cases where this collection of data has saved lives. <\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

“Lawyers and intelligence experts with direct knowledge of two intercepted terrorist plots that the Obama administration says confirm the value of the NSA\u2019s vast data-mining activities have questioned whether the surveillance sweeps played a significant role, if any, in foiling the attacks. The defense of the controversial data collection operations … has been led by Dianne Feinstein, chairwoman of the Senate intelligence committee, and her equivalent in the House, Mike Rogers.”<\/p>\n

And they point to two cases in which the data sweep has been worthwhile. One was the New York subway bomber, last name Zazi in 2009. The other, David Headley, who is serving a 35-year prison sentence for his role in the 2008 Mumbai attacks. If you remember, that was a huge attack that succeeded, if you recall. The hotel that was hit there was blown to smithereens and they\u2019re claiming, “Yeah, but we found the guy because of this program. Yeah, we did, we found the guy.” <\/p>\n

“Court documents lodged in the US and UK, as well as interviews with involved parties, suggest that data-mining through Prism and other NSA programs played a relatively minor role in the interception of the two plots.” Look, I don\u2019t want to go into any details, but the point is, the regime says, “Well, for all of this sweeping of data, we\u2019ve stopped two things.” Well, one thing wasn\u2019t stopped. Mumbai blew sky-high. “Well, yeah, that\u2019s right, but we found the guy that did it.” Okay, cool. And the other was the New York subway thing. <\/p>\n

Now, again, in trying to close the loop here, what are we getting for this? This massive data mining, massive sweep, this is taking a lot of time, it is costing a lot of money. It has to be diverting resources from real law enforcement, if you ask me. It has to be diverting attention to real national security issues. This kind of sweeping access to every citizen\u2019s assumed private data would come under the category of a general warrant, for the back door in this case, but the Founding Fathers objected to this kind of sweeping government power when they were putting the Constitution together. <\/p>\n

In fact, it was the states that demanded what became the Fourth Amendment, that you are safe in your person, in your home, against unreasonable searches. It was the states that demanded this, once they saw where this massive type of invasion of what most people would think is private. The states demanded what became the Fourth Amendment before they would ratify the Constitution. So there are a lot of people, and look, they\u2019re good people, too. <\/p>\n

I mean, John Bolton and a number of others are telling people like me to one extent or another, “Calm down. You\u2019re overdoing this. This is not some giant government conspiracy. There\u2019s really nothing to see. All three branches have approved of this. There\u2019s nothing happening here that\u2019s putting you at risk. There\u2019s no attempt to dig up data on you for the government to use against you. This is perfectly fine. We need to do this kind of intel gathering to stop terror attacks.” <\/line><\/p>\n

There are a lot of people that are appalled by this. This kind of massive ability, requests for this data up a thousand percent under Obama, and I don\u2019t know how — maybe I\u2019m being naive and maybe I just don\u2019t know enough, but, as I\u2019ve said before when you have the same people doing all of this data mining, who have used the IRS against people<\/a> who are my friends, the Tea Party, to suppress their political participation, I don\u2019t know how you overlook it and say it isn\u2019t any big deal. <\/p>\n

I have a story. I haven\u2019t printed it out yet. It has been discovered that the IRS already has collected 60 million medical records of people from California alone. I don\u2019t know under what authority. Probably Obamacare, you would think. I can\u2019t imagine that when the country was founded, and the Constitution was being put together, that this kind of thing was considered, thought of, and approved. This is the kind of thing that this country was established in opposition to. <\/p>\n

Now, I will allow the possibility that maybe I am seeing this in a tunnel vision way, because there are a lot of people I respect who say, “There\u2019s nothing to see here, Rush. This isn\u2019t any big deal. This is common, ordinary, and in most cases you ought to be glad it\u2019s happening because it\u2019s oriented toward security and safety and so forth.” And I, in a sense, understand that. But when I see who\u2019s doing the collecting, and I see how they\u2019re lying about it, Clapper and these guys —<\/p>\n

Let me say at the outset here, and I think this is probably a lot of people\u2019s attitude, which is what allows this to happen. “Well, hell, I haven\u2019t done anything. I\u2019m not afraid. They can find out whatever they want about me.” There\u2019s nothing personal in my having red flags about this. I\u2019m a small-government guy. This isn\u2019t small government. This isn\u2019t limited government. Just the exact opposite.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Barney in Tucson, Arizona. Great to have you on the EIB Network. Hello.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Thank you, Rush. And it does matter who\u2019s doing this. And I\u2019d like to answer your question, why. What the left wants most is to stay in power, and this is a scheme to enable them to do just that. You mentioned yesterday that they know, for instance, if you called the Romney campaign. So they also can generate a political profile on you. This is the data they\u2019re after. Because after they profile, if you\u2019re their kind of voter and you\u2019re not registered, their union buddies come to your door and have you fill out a registration form. They did something similar in Colorado a few years ago. It was the subject of the book Blueprint, and last year in Arizona they pulled off a few illegal maneuvers to influence elections here. And this is the scheme.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Well, it\u2019s an interesting look at it. So you think they\u2019re profiling supporters and people who oppose them?<\/p>\n

CALLER: They\u2019ve been doing it all over the country. When we did redistricting in Arizona last year, we were supposed to hire an Arizona mapping company for a half million to help with the project. They hired at a cost of over a million, not a mapping company, but a microtargeting company, and it was the same one that Obama used to profile for his election, to target voters.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Okay. Let me ask you a question here, Barney. What happens if the Democrats lose the White House?<\/p>\n

CALLER: Well, the key here is, there\u2019s this one organization called Strategic Telemetry. It\u2019s the organization that is responsible for both projects. And if any of this data is transferred to them — and I can\u2019t see these people who don\u2019t care about the law not doing it — they have the material they need to do a profile on everybody with a telephone. And what they do is, it\u2019s easy to profile, depending on who you call or what connections you make. And they know, hey, this guy is 80% likely to vote Democrat. And so they canvas. They go to the door if you\u2019re not registered and say, “We want you to fill out a –“<\/p>\n

RUSH: Barney, wait a second. They\u2019re not going door-to-door all over the country.<\/p>\n

CALLER: They are. They are.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Well, they\u2019ve not come to my door. They\u2019ve not rung my buzzer. They\u2019re not doing everybody. My question, what happens if they lose an election, what happens to all this?<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

CALLER: The data is still kept in the coffers of this company, which is used by a lot of Democrats running. What they\u2019ve been doing is targeting key states. I\u2019ll give you an example of what they were able to pull off in Arizona. A few years back we used to be seven to one Republican in Congress. But with this scam they pulled in redistricting last year, even though all 13 statewide races were won by Republicans, not a single Democrat, in Congress they managed to shift us to blue. We\u2019re 5-4 Democrats in Congress due to this targeting they pulled off. And they did it a few years ago in Colorado. And I\u2019m convinced that this is what they\u2019re using this data for, \u2019cause this administration doesn\u2019t seem to give a dang about national security. We know that from lots of different —<\/p>\n

RUSH: Well, see that, now, rings a bell. Because the Boston bombing happened. And, by the way, they were sweeping before the Boston bombing. They just renewed it after the Boston bombing, the renewal for the sweep every three months. They didn\u2019t start the day after the Boston bombing. It intensified. But I think what Barney is talking about — we played the sound bite, we went back, played this again for you. Cookie, find this in the archive. We played it earlier this week. You remember Maxine Waters — and I\u2019ll tell you what Barney is talking about. Organizing for America, the campaign organization that Obama has established that\u2019s being run now, which is part of the Limbaugh Theorem, Obama is doing three fundraisers today, folks. He\u2019s at three fundraisers today. For what? He\u2019s not running for election again. Why are you doing fundraising? <\/p>\n

These are not Democrat Party things. These are Organizing for America. Now, Maxine Waters said that Obama <\/a>had the most massive database ever collected in America. Information on everybody. It was unprecedented. Nobody had ever had any kind of a database like this. I think this is what Barney, in part, is referring to. Maxine Waters lets a lot of truth slip. She let it slip during a congressional hearing with some CEOs of some industry. (imitating Waters) “We want to nationalize. We want to take over your business.” It was the oil industry. And the rest of the Democrats on the committee kind of hung their heads, “Oh, jeez,” like she\u2019s some sort of idiot. <\/p>\n

But instead, what they were doing, “Oh, come on, Maxine, shut up, what are you giving up the game for?” Is what their reaction was. So we\u2019ll find the Maxine Waters bite. Don\u2019t discount it. She would know, and she would also be loose-lipped enough to mention it. She was proud of it, this massive, unprecedented database that Obama was collecting. That\u2019s why we\u2019ve raised the question, you go to the health exchange and you want to get a policy, “Did you vote Obama or not?” depends on where you end up in the line. People guess about that. <\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Here it is. This is Maxine Waters, originally broadcast on February 3rd of 2013. Remember this guy Roland Martin? He was an analyst, show up now and then kind of guy, was on CNN. And then he did something that got him fired, probably attracted an audience. But he has his own show on something called TV One, and it\u2019s called Washington Watch with Roland Martin. And back in February, interviewed Maxine Waters, and they were talking about Obama\u2019s second term. And Roland Martin said to her, “The reality is, like anything else, you\u2019d better get what you can while he\u2019s there, because, look, come 2016, Obama\u2019s gone.” This is a program aimed at minorities and get what you can means, you know, score your phones and your benefits, whatever, while you can, because once Obama\u2019s gone, who knows. This is what Maxine Waters said.<\/p>\n

WATERS: Well, you know, I don\u2019t know, and I think some people are missing something here. The president has put in place an organization that contains the kind of database that no one has ever seen before in life. That\u2019s going to be very, very powerful. That database will have information about everything, on every individual, in ways that it\u2019s never been done before.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

RUSH: Now, it\u2019s Maxine Waters. You hear this, and you think you\u2019ve taken up residence in Kookville, and you reject it. But she lets the cat out of the bag on a lot of stuff the left is doing. “The president has put in place an organization that contains the kind of database no one has ever seen before in life.” Hello, PRISM. Hello, sweeping of every freaking phone call in America. “It\u2019s going to be very, very powerful.” Every phone call in America, the data is swept by Obama\u2019s NSA. “That database will have information about everything on every individual in ways that it\u2019s never been done before.” And then she said whoever runs for president on the Democrat ticket will have it. It\u2019s something Obama is leaving as a legacy to the Democrat Party. In addition, he\u2019ll use it, I\u2019m sure, as he and Michelle put together the Barack Obama presidential library for social justice, wherever they do it. <\/p>\n

She said: “Whoever runs for President on the Democratic ticket has to deal with that.”<\/line>Meaning, will have access to it. “They\u2019re going to go down with that database and the concerns of those people because they can\u2019t get around it. And he\u2019s been very smart. It\u2019s very powerful what he\u2019s leaving in place.”<\/line><\/p>\n

This is what Barney, our last caller, was talking about, and this is what\u2019s going on. And this is why, I\u2019m sorry, the fact that it\u2019s just metadata and it happened under Bush and so forth, not to this extent. With Bush I felt pretty confident they were looking at foreign related phone calls, to or from. I never heard anybody in the Republican Party start bragging about this massive database Bush was putting together, start bragging about what kind of legacy the Republicans were gonna have with this. <\/p>\n

It\u2019s just like with the IRS. All of this data collection and all of this monitoring is in itself intimidating. It\u2019s intimidating to any opponents of the regime. It could be intimidating to any opponent of a Democrat candidate. Look at what they did to Romney in the form of TV ads without even any data collection. They just up and out lied about Romney\u2019s character. But, anyway, aside from the collection of data, look at the intimidation. When anybody smiles at you, and says, “You know, we know everything about you, and we\u2019re finding out everything you do tomorrow,” that carries with it a degree of intimidation. <\/p>\n

So now critics of Obama not only have to worry about the IRS, they gotta worry about the NSA. And the NSA then telling the IRS and the FBI, and then those people downloading information to ProPublica, which is left-wing journalists, and that\u2019s how the data on you can end up in profiles in the media, as in the attacks on Romney donors. And all of that is intimidating. In that case, the intimidation was, if you\u2019re gonna make sizeable donations to a Republican, this is what\u2019s gonna happen to you. These people politicize everything. Government is the biggest prize in the world. <\/p>\n

Folks, if I can personalize this. I want to speak to all of you as individuals here to try to make this point. I don\u2019t care what it is; no judgmentalism here. What is the one thing in life you want more than anything? Whatever it is, imagine the passion you have about achieving it or acquiring it or succeeding at whatever the most desirous thing you have. And everybody has something like this, that you want more than anything. For some of us it\u2019s always gonna be a fantasy because it\u2019s unattainable, but regardless, think of the emotion attached to the desire, whatever the one thing in life you want more than anything. <\/p>\n

Well, to these people, the one thing that they want more than anything is the total control of the biggest and most powerful institution in the world, the government of the United States of America. Their reason for being politically involved has nothing to do with the Constitution. It has nothing to do with preserving freedom or liberty or enhancing life and circumstances for citizens. It is the acquisition of personal power, and these people are also unified around something else that\u2019s just as crucially important, and that is, they want to get rid of any substantive opposition, however they can do it. So if they achieve in acquiring this power, control over the government, then they\u2019ll use that to make sure they never lose it. <\/p>\n

That\u2019s what Barney\u2019s talking about in his call from Tucson, Arizona. That\u2019s what Barney thinks is underway. That\u2019s what Barney thinks Maxine Waters\u2019 database is all about. A permanent, never ending control of all of the most powerful institutions in the world that are all here in the US government. That\u2019s what they\u2019re after. <\/p>\n

Now, we, as conservatives, can\u2019t even relate to that when it comes to government. We want to get government out of everybody\u2019s life. That\u2019s why there isn\u2019t any commonality. That\u2019s why there\u2019s no chance here for compromise or bipartisan, especially not with this latest bunch of liberal Democrats. Now, most of their little low-information followers haven\u2019t the slightest idea what\u2019s going on. They don\u2019t have the awareness. If you sat \u2019em down and told \u2019em this is what Obama\u2019s doing and why, it would go in one ear and out the other, couldn\u2019t comprehend it, wouldn\u2019t even want to try to. But they willingly facilitate by supporting it. <\/p>\n

Now, let me ask you this. People like Obama and his buddies, associates, the Democrat Party who want all this power, do you think that they could have it if they came to us and said, “This is what we want. We want you to elect us. We want you to support us because we want the power. We want to be able to control –” Of course not. So how are they doing it? Well, there\u2019s the Limbaugh Theorem to explain Obama\u2019s detachment, but the trick is they have to mislead everybody as to their true ambition, as to their true desire, in order to acquire this power, because it is such anathema to the American human spirit and tradition. <\/p>\n

You acquire all of this data on people, you think about how easy it is to manipulate low-information voters with this kind of information, this kind of data. The way this bunch does it is they claim to be the kings of compassion, the kings of love. All they want to do is help people. All they want to do is give you this and give you that, make sure that can\u2019t be taken away from you and that, so forth, and what they\u2019re ending up doing at the same time is the exact opposite. <\/p>\n

Now, you know this, and this is why all of this is so upsetting. And once you realize it, it\u2019s simple. It\u2019s obvious to see. Then the frustration sets in, “Why don\u2019t other people see it? Why don\u2019t they believe it when I tell them about it?” Because most people can\u2019t conceive of wanting this kind of power. And the people seeking it never, ever give any indication that it\u2019s what they want. Or they wouldn\u2019t stand a chance. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

RUSH: So where are we? The individual — and this is reputed to be constitutional law, and statute law, by the way. The individual has no right in his phone number, he doesn\u2019t own it. He doesn\u2019t own the contents of the telephone calls that he makes. You don\u2019t own that, the phone company does. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nDid Maxine Let the Cat Out of the Bag on Democrat Data Mining to Tip Elections? - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2013\/06\/12\/did_maxine_let_the_cat_out_of_the_bag_on_democrat_data_mining_to_tip_elections\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Did Maxine Let the Cat Out of the Bag on Democrat Data Mining to Tip Elections? - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: So where are we? The individual — and this is reputed to be constitutional law, and statute law, by the way. The individual has no right in his phone number, he doesn\u2019t own it. He doesn\u2019t own the contents of the telephone calls that he makes. You don\u2019t own that, the phone company does. […]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"GeorgePrayias\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"19 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2013\/06\/12\/did_maxine_let_the_cat_out_of_the_bag_on_democrat_data_mining_to_tip_elections\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2013\/06\/12\/did_maxine_let_the_cat_out_of_the_bag_on_democrat_data_mining_to_tip_elections\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2013\/06\/12\/did_maxine_let_the_cat_out_of_the_bag_on_democrat_data_mining_to_tip_elections\/\",\"name\":\"Did Maxine Let the Cat Out of the Bag on Democrat Data Mining to Tip Elections? - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2013\/06\/12\/did_maxine_let_the_cat_out_of_the_bag_on_democrat_data_mining_to_tip_elections\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2013-06-12T17:44:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-06-12T17:44:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2013\/06\/12\/did_maxine_let_the_cat_out_of_the_bag_on_democrat_data_mining_to_tip_elections\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2013\/06\/12\/did_maxine_let_the_cat_out_of_the_bag_on_democrat_data_mining_to_tip_elections\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2013\/06\/12\/did_maxine_let_the_cat_out_of_the_bag_on_democrat_data_mining_to_tip_elections\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Did Maxine Let the Cat Out of the Bag on Democrat Data Mining to Tip Elections?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4\",\"name\":\"GeorgePrayias\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"GeorgePrayias\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/GeorgePrayias\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Did Maxine Let the Cat Out of the Bag on Democrat Data Mining to Tip Elections? - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2013\/06\/12\/did_maxine_let_the_cat_out_of_the_bag_on_democrat_data_mining_to_tip_elections\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"Did Maxine Let the Cat Out of the Bag on Democrat Data Mining to Tip Elections? - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: So where are we? The individual — and this is reputed to be constitutional law, and statute law, by the way. The individual has no right in his phone number, he doesn\u2019t own it. He doesn\u2019t own the contents of the telephone calls that he makes. You don\u2019t own that, the phone company does. […]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"GeorgePrayias","Est. reading time":"19 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#website","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2013\/06\/12\/did_maxine_let_the_cat_out_of_the_bag_on_democrat_data_mining_to_tip_elections\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2013\/06\/12\/did_maxine_let_the_cat_out_of_the_bag_on_democrat_data_mining_to_tip_elections\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2013\/06\/12\/did_maxine_let_the_cat_out_of_the_bag_on_democrat_data_mining_to_tip_elections\/","name":"Did Maxine Let the Cat Out of the Bag on Democrat Data Mining to Tip Elections? - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2013\/06\/12\/did_maxine_let_the_cat_out_of_the_bag_on_democrat_data_mining_to_tip_elections\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2013-06-12T17:44:01+00:00","dateModified":"2013-06-12T17:44:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2013\/06\/12\/did_maxine_let_the_cat_out_of_the_bag_on_democrat_data_mining_to_tip_elections\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2013\/06\/12\/did_maxine_let_the_cat_out_of_the_bag_on_democrat_data_mining_to_tip_elections\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2013\/06\/12\/did_maxine_let_the_cat_out_of_the_bag_on_democrat_data_mining_to_tip_elections\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Did Maxine Let the Cat Out of the Bag on Democrat Data Mining to Tip Elections?"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4","name":"GeorgePrayias","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"GeorgePrayias"},"url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/GeorgePrayias\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12208"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12208"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12208\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12208"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12208"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12208"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}