{"id":213709,"date":"2016-06-01T18:43:08","date_gmt":"2016-06-01T22:43:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/172.24.32.11\/daily\/2016\/06\/01\/mrs_clinton_lacks_trump_s_star_power_and_the_democrats_know_it\/"},"modified":"2016-06-01T18:43:08","modified_gmt":"2016-06-01T22:43:08","slug":"mrs_clinton_lacks_trump_s_star_power_and_the_democrats_know_it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/01\/mrs_clinton_lacks_trump_s_star_power_and_the_democrats_know_it\/","title":{"rendered":"Mrs. Clinton Lacks Trump\u2019s Star Power &#8212; And the Democrats Know It"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/videos\/37\/71712\" target=\"_blank\"><img class=\"alignright\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\" alt=\"Listen to it Button\"><\/a> <\/p>\n<section xmlns:image=\"http:\/\/ez.no\/namespaces\/ezpublish3\/image\/\" xmlns:xhtml=\"http:\/\/ez.no\/namespaces\/ezpublish3\/xhtml\/\" xmlns:custom=\"http:\/\/ez.no\/namespaces\/ezpublish3\/custom\/\">\n<p>RUSH: Now, moving on to Mrs. Clinton.&nbsp; Last night, The Lead with Jake Tapper.&nbsp; He had an exclusive interview with Mrs. Clinton (not too many people get those), and he said, &#8220;Donald Trump today said that he raised at least $5.6 million for veterans charities.&nbsp; He provided an accounting of those donations.&nbsp; Your campaign says, &#8216;Nobody should be fooled by Trump\u2019s stunt.\u2019 What do you mean by that, Mrs. Clinton?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>HILLARY:&nbsp; Well, I think the problem here is the difference between what Donald Trump says and what Donald Trump does.&nbsp; He\u2019s bragged for months about raising $6 million for veterans and donating a million dollars himself.&nbsp; But it took a reporter to shame him into it making his contribution and getting the money to veterans.&nbsp; So I&#8230; Look, I\u2019m glad he finally did, but I don\u2019t know that he should get much credit for that.<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_123205\" class=\"img_middle\" align=\"middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Hillary-close-up-B.jpg\"\/><line xmlns:tmp=\"http:\/\/ez.no\/namespaces\/ezpublish3\/temporary\/\">RUSH:&nbsp; Right.&nbsp; Okay, so that\u2019s Mrs. Clinton.&nbsp; Now, usually it would stop there.&nbsp; But Jake Tapper said, &#8220;Well, he said that you haven\u2019t given anything to veterans groups.&nbsp; What\u2019s your response to that, Mrs. Clinton?&nbsp; What have you given to veterans charities &#8212; and, more broadly, what have you done for veterans?&#8221;<\/line><\/p>\n<p>HILLARY:&nbsp; Well, I, of course, have given money to veterans charities.&nbsp; I\u2019ve also worked starting as first lady to deal with some of the problems veterans have.&nbsp; I worked as a senator on the Armed Services Committee on veterans things &#8212; for example, increasing death benefits for families of the fallen from just $12,000 to $100,000.&nbsp; So much of the work that I\u2019ve done has meant tens of millions of dollars in increased benefits!<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; This just makes me want to throw up.&nbsp; You know what she\u2019s saying?&nbsp; She said, &#8220;Well, I\u2019ve made sure that we in government have used a lot of other people\u2019s money and directed it to the veterans.&nbsp; I have increased veterans\u2019 benefits.&nbsp; I\u2019ve seen to it that other people\u2019s money has been increased from $12,000 to $100,000.&nbsp; So much of the work I\u2019ve done has meant tens of millions of dollars.&nbsp; Not my own, of course, \u2019cause I don\u2019t give anybody money.&nbsp; I don\u2019t donate to charity.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;But I make sure that the force of law separates other people from their money so that it goes to places so that I don\u2019t have to give it.&#8221;&nbsp; That\u2019s what her answer meant.&nbsp; She may not like my translation, but that\u2019s exactly what it is.&nbsp; &#8220;Of course I\u2019ve given money to veterans charities.&nbsp; I\u2019ve worked starting as first lady to deal with some of the problems.&nbsp; I worked as a senator on the Armed Services Committee.&nbsp; I have increased death benefits for families.&#8221;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Yeah.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Other people\u2019s money.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>So they looked into it and they found that she\u2019s donated 70 grand, $70,000.&nbsp; But, of course, as a good liberal, Mrs. Clinton, &#8220;Ah, that\u2019s chump change! I have arranged for much more than that.&nbsp; I have used the force of law to increase the amount of the federal budget that comes from other people\u2019s taxes.&#8221;&nbsp; What a cheap cop-out.&nbsp; That kind of stuff just&#8230; It sickens me and angers me at the same time.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Claiming credit for having the courage to pass new legislation that directs the federal government to send even more, and then wanting credit for having a big heart and charitable intentions? One more from Jacob Tapper, Jake Tapper here on CNN, his Lead with Jake Tapper show.&nbsp; He said in an editorial today, &#8220;USA Today called your private email server &#8216;a threat to national security, one that you repeatedly ignored despite multiple warnings,\u2019 and they added that you were now going to have to convince voters that you can put the national security of the US above your own short term self-interest.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Do you see this as a challenge that you have to face to convince voters that you\u2019ll put national security ahead of your own interests?&#8221;&nbsp; I want you to listen to this, because basically what Jake Tapper\u2019s asking her &#8212; and you don\u2019t hear this. You don\u2019t see this much.&nbsp; That\u2019s why this interview stands out.&nbsp; Anybody else doing this interview would have stopped after her first answer.&nbsp; Nobody else, that I can think of, would have gone in and asked her what she\u2019s done for vets.&nbsp; But she\u2019s basically being asked to answer a question on her honesty here.&nbsp; And listen to the stumbling and the stuttering as she seeks and searches in vain to answer.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/vjxsObDWJrI\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>HILLARY:&nbsp; Well, I&#8230; I think that is obvious.&nbsp; I always have.&nbsp; And the report, just to go back to the actual report, makes it clear that personal email use &#8212; the practice &#8212; under other secretaries of state &#8212; and that the rules that they\u2019re now referencing &#8212; were not clarified until after I had left.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; So she can\u2019t answer the question, and then when she does she lies again.&nbsp; The rules were crystal clear and she broke \u2019em.&nbsp; She says, &#8220;The rules were not clarified \u2019til after I left.&#8221; That\u2019s BS.&nbsp; The rules are made clear to everybody walks in there for the first time.&nbsp; The rules descend from the law.&nbsp; The rules in the State Department on these emails and servers and so forth descend from federal law, statutory law.&nbsp; That\u2019s why it\u2019s incorrect to say that all she did was violate some rules.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>But then I think she stepped in it again when she said if she had it to do all over again, she wouldn\u2019t do it the way she did, if she knew.&nbsp; What does that mean?&nbsp; &#8220;Yeah, I made some mistakes. I wouldn\u2019t make the same mistake again.&#8221; What does that mean?&nbsp; And I referenced this earlier, so I want to play the bite.&nbsp; This is number 15.&nbsp; I mentioned that I had heard some Drive-By say they\u2019d loved to be insulted by Hillary.&nbsp; It\u2019s Nancy Cordes on CBS This Morning.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2016\/05\/31\/mrs_clinton_has_no_audience\"><img id=\"eZObject_123224\" class=\"img_middle\" align=\"middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/HillarySign-empty-chairs.jpg\"\/><\/a>Norah O\u2019Donnell was speaking with the CBS congressional correspondent about Trump\u2019s press conference yesterday.&nbsp; She said, &#8220;It wasn\u2019t until the Washington Post reported last week that Trump had not yet donated to an organization $1 million, the Marine Corps-Law Enforcement Foundation.&nbsp; A day later he makes the donation, including the Associated Press saying last week after the checks were donated.&nbsp; How is Hillary Clinton\u2019s campaign responded?&nbsp; What do you think they\u2019ll do?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>CORDES:&nbsp; Those of us who cover the Hillary Clinton campaign would love to have a press conference even if she insulted us.&nbsp; She hasn\u2019t done one for months and months.<\/p>\n<p>O\u2019DONNELL:&nbsp; And why not?<\/p>\n<p>CORDES:&nbsp; She\u2019s just, you know, not that comfortable in that setting.&nbsp; Last week, for example, when this big, new report came out from the State Department\u2019s inspector general, there were a lot of us on the campaign trail who were going to ask her questions about it and she avoided all of us.&nbsp; She\u2019s just not interested in getting the kinds of tough questions out there on the trail lots of people shouting at her.&nbsp; That\u2019s not her milieu &#8212; while Donald Trump, of course, is very comfortable with that.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:&nbsp; You know, did you hear, it\u2019s almost like, &#8220;Yeah, we understand, she doesn\u2019t like these, so we\u2019re not gonna push her on it.&nbsp; I mean, we\u2019d love it if she\u2019d show up, but we\u2019re not gonna make a big deal because she\u2019s not comfortable, you know. Mrs. Clinton is not comfortable having all kinds of people shout things at her, makes her nervous, and we understand that.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;You know, Trump happens to love that, he just gets off on that, but Mrs. Clinton&#8230; we\u2019d love her to show up, God we love her to death, oh, my God, do we love Hillary, oh.&nbsp; But she just doesn\u2019t like a gaggle of us hanging around asking questions and shouting them.&nbsp; We understand that.&nbsp; She\u2019s not interested in getting tough questions out there, and we wouldn\u2019t, either, you know, we wouldn\u2019t like to get those questions. So we understand that she doesn\u2019t want to answer them so we don\u2019t ask \u2019em.&#8221;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Of course, the myth there is that they ask her tough questions.&nbsp; Maybe I\u2019m missing examples of it, but I don\u2019t recall a lot of tough questions.&nbsp; Now, Hillary, given the number of lies, everything may qualify as a tough question, I don\u2019t know.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_123225\" class=\"img_right\" align=\"right\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/hillaryclintonRed_large.jpg\"\/><line xmlns:tmp=\"http:\/\/ez.no\/namespaces\/ezpublish3\/temporary\/\">Now, here\u2019s Doug Schoen and his piece in the Wall Street Journal today: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/clinton-might-not-be-the-nominee-1464733898\">&#8220;Clinton Might Not Be the Nominee.&#8221;<\/a> I want to remind you of a couple things I said the top of the program.&nbsp; You know, this sentiment is gaining credibility that she might not be the nominee.&nbsp; It\u2019s gaining credibility on the Democrat side.&nbsp; Look, throw out the rules here, throw out the conventional wisdom, throw out the ages-old playbook and look at something as it is happening.&nbsp;<\/line><\/p>\n<p>On the Trump side, you have a candidate who is a pop culture hero, a pop culture star.&nbsp; You have somebody who is becoming a political and pop culture star.&nbsp; It\u2019s not many politicians that can do that crossover.&nbsp; You know, politics is showbiz for the ugly, and that\u2019s why politics has its own Oscars and has its own stuff like the White House Correspondents Dinner where they invite real celebrities to show up and give them credibility.&nbsp; But, you know, there aren\u2019t too many politicians that cross over and are legitimate political stars and pop culture stars.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>And Trump is.&nbsp; Whether you like it or not. And I\u2019m not opining on it; I\u2019m just saying it\u2019s what it is. &nbsp;There is enthusiasm on the Trump side like there isn\u2019t anywhere else in this entire campaign.&nbsp; No other candidate, Republican, Democrat, independent, has anything like this going on.&nbsp; Trump, I read this morning, has achieved 100% name recognition, meaning he\u2019s the most famous person on the planet right now.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Do you remember one of the arguments that the establishment people were making back last summer and into early fall is that the fact that Trump was already so well known was what was going to eventually doom his prospects, \u2019cause he had no room to grow, they said.&nbsp; He\u2019s already got high name recognition.&nbsp; He\u2019s got a very high Q factor.&nbsp; There\u2019s nowhere to go but down for Donald Trump.&nbsp; They\u2019ve been wrong on every level of analysis.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>So now you have Trump and this unmistakable, the Trump support is more than just political support for a candidate.&nbsp; And you compare that, the Democrats see it, and everybody sees it, you can\u2019t miss it, it equals excitement, it equals buzz.&nbsp; People are having a good time.&nbsp; The candidate is having a good time.&nbsp; The candidate may be having the best time of his life.&nbsp; Everybody involved in this is soaking it up and eating it up, and they\u2019re making the most of it, they\u2019re laughing, enjoying, they\u2019re having a great time.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_123226\" class=\"img_middle\" align=\"middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/HillaryWorst-Ever.jpg\"\/><line xmlns:tmp=\"http:\/\/ez.no\/namespaces\/ezpublish3\/temporary\/\">And over on the Democrat side, there isn\u2019t even a speck of anything like that.&nbsp; It is sheer boredom.&nbsp; It is sheer dryball.&nbsp; It is dull, it is gray, it is scandal racked, there\u2019s no excitement.&nbsp; Mrs. Clinton is not only not a political star, she has no hope of being a pop culture crossover star.&nbsp; Even the people that are gonna vote for her hold their nose to do it in many cases.&nbsp; They\u2019re doing it because there\u2019s a D next to her name.&nbsp; Not because they\u2019re attached or connected to her in any way.&nbsp; We know that that doesn\u2019t exist.&nbsp;<\/line><\/p>\n<p>The Democrat Party ought to be scared to death, just like the Republican Party was back in \u201992 when this was happening in a much more limited way, but still happening with Perot.&nbsp; But, I mean, what happened with Perot pales in comparison to this thing with Trump.&nbsp; You can\u2019t create this.&nbsp; And that\u2019s another thing that bugs \u2019em.&nbsp; This is totally genuine.&nbsp; When the Tea Party popped up, they could go out and manufacture its counterpart, Occupy Wall Street, and they could use the media to make it look like that it was a natural effervescence of legitimate Democrat socialist thought.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>But Occupy Wall Street was bought and paid for.&nbsp; They can\u2019t go out and buy.&nbsp; They can\u2019t create.&nbsp; There is no Hollywood star.&nbsp; There is no Hollywood agent.&nbsp; There is no Hollywood image maker that can go out and create for Hillary Clinton what is happening legitimately on the Trump side.&nbsp; Do you know what I read today?&nbsp; Ari Emanuel &#8212; do you know who he is?&nbsp; He\u2019s Rahm Emanuel\u2019s brother.&nbsp; Not a surgeon.&nbsp; He\u2019s an agent.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>He is one of the biggest, most successful Hollywood agents. I mean, he\u2019s the agent to agents.&nbsp; He runs agents.&nbsp; He\u2019s the new, and has been for a long time, Michael Ovitz.&nbsp; He\u2019s the guy, nothing happens in town without going through him.&nbsp; He wants to script Trump\u2019s convention.&nbsp; He\u2019s an avowed Democrat.&nbsp; I know the guy.&nbsp; One year at the AT&#038;T celebrity classic they seated me next to him thinking there would be fireworks like <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2016\/05\/19\/rush_golfs_where_men_can_be_men_links_it_to_paglia_s_piece_on_trump_s_lifestyle_with_the_ladies_and_political_blindness_like_that_behind_the_fakebook_scandal\">CBS sat me next to Camille Paglia<\/a>.&nbsp; They thought there\u2019d be fisticuffs.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>But he was a great guy, is nice, invited me to his house to watch the Oscars.&nbsp; He\u2019s a good guy.&nbsp; Still, he\u2019s a dyed-in-the-wool Democrat liberal, don\u2019t misunderstand.&nbsp; The point, he wants to script Trump\u2019s convention.&nbsp; People want to be part of whatever is happening with Trump, and showbiz people especially.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>My point is, there\u2019s nothing that can even get close to this on the Democrat side.&nbsp; They think Hollywood and that kind of stardom is theirs, that they own that, that they are the Hollywood left and all that is big with the Democrats.&nbsp; So my point is, there\u2019s all kinds of panic and fear that she\u2019s not gonna be the nominee.&nbsp; There\u2019s all kinds of panic and fear that she ought not be, that they need to pull her, \u2019cause there\u2019s far more excitement for dull and crazy Bernie.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Doug Schoen\u2019s piece in the Wall Street Journal today.&nbsp; &#8220;Clinton Might Not Be the Nominee &#8212; A Sanders win in California would turbocharge the mounting Democratic unease about her viability.&#8221;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>And he begins the piece this way.&nbsp; &#8220;There is now more than a theoretical chance that Hillary Clinton may not be the Democratic nominee for president.&#8221; This guy\u2019s a former Clinton pollster.&nbsp; He\u2019s a regular on Fox News.&nbsp; He\u2019s one of the ranking probably top five or top 10 Democrat analysts, strategists, pollsters, or what have you.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>He writes&#8221; &#8220;How could that happen, given that her nomination has been considered a sure thing by virtually everyone in the media and in the party.&#8221;&nbsp; Notice he included the media in that.&nbsp; It\u2019s been a foregone conclusion that Hillary\u2019s gonna be the nominee, in the media and in the party, \u2019cause there\u2019s no difference.&nbsp; The media is the party and versa-vice.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The inevitability behind Mrs. Clinton\u2019s nomination will be in large measure eviscerated if she loses the June 7 California primary to Bernie Sanders. That could well happen.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Now, the point of this piece &#8212; I\u2019m gonna get some pull quotes here &#8212; point of this piece is holding out Plugs Biden and Elizabeth Warren as replacement options.&nbsp; Check out this pull quote from the Doug Schoen piece.<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_123230\" class=\"img_middle\" align=\"middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/BidenNov2.jpg\"\/><line xmlns:tmp=\"http:\/\/ez.no\/namespaces\/ezpublish3\/temporary\/\">&#8220;Mr. Biden would be cast as the white knight rescuing the party, and the nation, from a possible Trump presidency. To win over Sanders supporters, he would likely choose as his running mate someone like Sen. Elizabeth Warren who is respected by the party\u2019s left wing.&#8221;<\/line><\/p>\n<p>Now, I don\u2019t know Doug Schoen, I\u2019ve not met him, but I\u2019m guessing here if he\u2019s writing this, they\u2019re already talking about this.&nbsp; He\u2019s just not openly speculating here for the sake of having column material.&nbsp; What this means is that this is being discussed, which ought not surprise people, but it will some.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Where is President Obama in all of this,&#8221; asks Mr. Schoen?&nbsp; &#8220;So far he has largely stayed out of the campaign, other than to say that he doesn\u2019t believe Mrs. Clinton compromised national security with her home-brew email server.&#8221; Yeah yada yada.&nbsp; Obama is in charge of the drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, that continues to happen here.&nbsp; I wouldn\u2019t be surprised. My own thinking, I think Obama would be fine if she\u2019s not the nominee, but he doesn\u2019t want his fingerprints on it like he doesn\u2019t want his fingerprints on much else.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;But with her poll numbers dropping, her legal headaches increasing, the Sanders candidacy showing renewed vigor, and Donald Trump looming as a wrecking ball for the president\u2019s legacy, Mr. Obama and adviser Valerie Jarrett might begin sending signals to the Democratic National Committee and to the vice president that a Biden rescue operation wouldn\u2019t displease the White House.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>So Schoen\u2019s saying, &#8220;Hey, look, Obama, Valerie, whoever, you better start the smoke signals, and you better let everybody know that you\u2019d be perfectly fine with Biden taking over.&#8221;&nbsp; &#8216;Cause if Obama\u2019s not down with it, it won\u2019t happen, supposedly.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Now, Mr. Schoen writes: &#8220;All of these remain merely possibilities. But it is easier now than ever to imagine a scenario in which Hillary Clinton &#8230; is not the Democratic presidential nominee.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Folks, they are scared.&nbsp; You have to put this in context.&nbsp; For months, for years, 2016 was gonna be a Democrat coronation.&nbsp; They were gonna be coming off a popular, overwhelmingly, undefeatably popular Barack Obama.&nbsp; Hillary was gonna step in there and maybe even expand the popularity and the vibes and the image and all that.&nbsp; It was gonna be a coronation.&nbsp; Whoever the Republicans nominated were gonna get creamed in a landslide, and this has been the operating theory for years, last two or three years.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Now it\u2019s up a upside down and they are scared.&nbsp; The Trump phenomenon\u2019s unnerving everybody, everybody in politics.&nbsp; It\u2019s unnerving a lot of people in talk radio.&nbsp; It\u2019s unnerving a lot of people in conservatism, in the media.&nbsp; You know why?&nbsp; Well, there\u2019s all kinds of reasons.&nbsp; There\u2019s all kinds of reasons, including anger, jealousy, envy, and things that are more personal, like someone\u2019s position in the establishment being so upended they\u2019re no longer in it.&nbsp; There\u2019s all kinds of reasons why the Trump phenomenon is unnerving a lot of people.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The Democrats know that Hillary Clinton is outclassed as a star, as a candidate, as a person that people want to be with and hang around with, want to be able to call a friend or whatever.&nbsp; She\u2019s just been totally exposed as a fraud, dull, nothing burger in the middle of all this light shining on the Trumpster.&nbsp; They know that Hillary Clinton can never have this kind of enthusiasm behind her.&nbsp; She could never have this kind of adoration, this kind of appreciation, even in her own party, and especially in her own party.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>So what to do?&nbsp; Well, there are many problems they face here.&nbsp; If they want Biden, there is the problem of Crazy Bernie and his supporters. &nbsp;And if the effort to take Hillary out happens before their convention and they don\u2019t throw it to Bernie, they\u2019ve got Chicago 1968 times five on their hands.&nbsp; So that tells us &#8212; using intelligence guided by experience &#8212; that if there is a forthcoming move made on Hillary, it\u2019ll happen after the convention, after which Bernie supporters will have been dealt with.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>They will maybe have been brought on board &#8212; somehow, some way.&nbsp; The typical unity attempts will be made at the convention to bring Bernie Sanders people on board.&nbsp; They don\u2019t want Bernie\u2019s people going to Trump.&nbsp; So they\u2019ll make whatever efforts they can.&nbsp; If they can get through the convention &#8212; and a lot depends on California.&nbsp; If they get through the convention with Hillary as the nominee and then the FBI drops what they\u2019ve got and DOJ looks at it and says, &#8220;You know, this is too much. We can\u2019t cover this up. This is too much.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>So they indict, and she loses the FBI primary, and then they plug in Plugs.&nbsp; And they will ameliorate the Bernie Sanders supporters, who will suspect that all of this was planned to ace him out.&nbsp; They will try to buy Bernie\u2019s voters with Elizabeth Warren as the veep, to keep them, keep Bernie\u2019s voters on board.&nbsp; That\u2019s what they\u2019re all thinking here.&nbsp; But just the fact that they\u2019re writing about this&#8230;&nbsp; And then, folks, if that happens &#8212; if any of this happens that I just described &#8212; then whatever Bill Kristol is planning is guaranteed to happen.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>I mean, that\u2019s gonna be a go signal for Kristol and whoever he\u2019s got, David French, and then Gary Johnson over there on the Libertarian side. You could end up &#8212; we could end up, if all this happens &#8212; with a four person race.&nbsp; Now, we have to understand: Bill Kristol, no matter what you think, is not thinking David French is gonna be elected president.&nbsp; That won\u2019t be the purpose.&nbsp; The purpose is to deny Trump and save Kristol\u2019s position and others in the establishment.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The independent guy, the Libertarian guys, they\u2019ve got their own agenda and so forth. But they\u2019ve got money woes, big time money woes.&nbsp; All of this is a real, real long shot.&nbsp; And if Hillary wins California, it kind of aces all of it out. But that\u2019s the first place it starts.&nbsp; But if they decide they have to take Hillary Clinton out, I can see where that is a &#8220;go&#8221; signal for these third-party people, because that means the whole thing\u2019s been turned upside down &#8212; and in that scenario, who knows what\u2019s possible? Who knows what can happen?<\/p>\n<p>So, as always, we\u2019ll be here explaining, defining, analyzing, predicting, and being right all along.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>RUSH: Now, moving on to Mrs. Clinton.&nbsp; Last night, The Lead with Jake Tapper.&nbsp; He had an exclusive interview with Mrs. Clinton (not too many people get those), and he said, &#8220;Donald Trump today said that he raised at least $5.6 million for veterans charities.&nbsp; He provided an accounting of those donations.&nbsp; Your campaign says, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v17.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Mrs. Clinton Lacks Trump&#039;s Star Power - And the Democrats Know It - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/01\/mrs_clinton_lacks_trump_s_star_power_and_the_democrats_know_it\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Mrs. Clinton Lacks Trump&#039;s Star Power - And the Democrats Know It - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: Now, moving on to Mrs. Clinton.&nbsp; Last night, The Lead with Jake Tapper.&nbsp; He had an exclusive interview with Mrs. Clinton (not too many people get those), and he said, &#8220;Donald Trump today said that he raised at least $5.6 million for veterans charities.&nbsp; He provided an accounting of those donations.&nbsp; Your campaign says, [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"19 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/01\/mrs_clinton_lacks_trump_s_star_power_and_the_democrats_know_it\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/01\/mrs_clinton_lacks_trump_s_star_power_and_the_democrats_know_it\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/01\/mrs_clinton_lacks_trump_s_star_power_and_the_democrats_know_it\/\",\"name\":\"Mrs. Clinton Lacks Trump's Star Power - And the Democrats Know It - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/01\/mrs_clinton_lacks_trump_s_star_power_and_the_democrats_know_it\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-06-01T22:43:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-01T22:43:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/01\/mrs_clinton_lacks_trump_s_star_power_and_the_democrats_know_it\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/01\/mrs_clinton_lacks_trump_s_star_power_and_the_democrats_know_it\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/01\/mrs_clinton_lacks_trump_s_star_power_and_the_democrats_know_it\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mrs. Clinton Lacks Trump\\u2019s Star Power &#8212; And the Democrats Know It\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mrs. Clinton Lacks Trump's Star Power - And the Democrats Know It - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/01\/mrs_clinton_lacks_trump_s_star_power_and_the_democrats_know_it\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"Mrs. Clinton Lacks Trump's Star Power - And the Democrats Know It - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: Now, moving on to Mrs. Clinton.&nbsp; Last night, The Lead with Jake Tapper.&nbsp; He had an exclusive interview with Mrs. Clinton (not too many people get those), and he said, &#8220;Donald Trump today said that he raised at least $5.6 million for veterans charities.&nbsp; He provided an accounting of those donations.&nbsp; Your campaign says, [&hellip;]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"","Est. reading time":"19 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/01\/mrs_clinton_lacks_trump_s_star_power_and_the_democrats_know_it\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg","contentUrl":"\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/01\/mrs_clinton_lacks_trump_s_star_power_and_the_democrats_know_it\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/01\/mrs_clinton_lacks_trump_s_star_power_and_the_democrats_know_it\/","name":"Mrs. Clinton Lacks Trump's Star Power - And the Democrats Know It - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/01\/mrs_clinton_lacks_trump_s_star_power_and_the_democrats_know_it\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2016-06-01T22:43:08+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-01T22:43:08+00:00","author":{"@id":""},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/01\/mrs_clinton_lacks_trump_s_star_power_and_the_democrats_know_it\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/01\/mrs_clinton_lacks_trump_s_star_power_and_the_democrats_know_it\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/06\/01\/mrs_clinton_lacks_trump_s_star_power_and_the_democrats_know_it\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mrs. Clinton Lacks Trump\u2019s Star Power &#8212; And the Democrats Know It"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213709"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=213709"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213709\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=213709"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=213709"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=213709"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}