{"id":213909,"date":"2016-07-05T18:07:47","date_gmt":"2016-07-05T22:07:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/172.24.32.11\/daily\/2016\/07\/05\/what_does_the_timing_of_mrs_clinton_s_proven_negligence_mean_for_the_presidential_race_\/"},"modified":"2017-07-10T11:06:31","modified_gmt":"2017-07-10T15:06:31","slug":"what_does_the_timing_of_mrs_clinton_s_proven_negligence_mean_for_the_presidential_race_","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/07\/05\/what_does_the_timing_of_mrs_clinton_s_proven_negligence_mean_for_the_presidential_race_\/","title":{"rendered":"What Does the Timing of Mrs. Clinton\u2019s Proven Negligence Mean for the Presidential Race?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/videos\/37\/72123\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><img class=\"alignright\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\" alt=\"Listen to it Button\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<section>RUSH: Here is Anthony in Cleveland.\u00a0 Great to have you, sir.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:\u00a0 Hi, Rush.\u00a0 I\u2019m a listener for 29 years, I think. Right around there.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 You\u2019re pretty close.\u00a0 We\u2019ve got our 28th anniversary coming up in less than a month.\u00a0 Do you realize, August 1st is gonna be 28 years?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:\u00a0 Oh, wow.\u00a0 Wow.\u00a0 I\u2019m approaching the third decade, so I\u2019m a proud listener.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 It\u2019s great to have you out there.<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_124441\" class=\"img_middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Cillizza.jpg\" align=\"middle\" \/>CALLER:\u00a0 Thank you. I\u2019ve been anticipating the end of this cheap matinee for several months now, and it happens a few weeks before the Republican convention?\u00a0 I\u2019m just interested in what your insight is towards that significance.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Uhhh&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>CALLER: If it is.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 The timing of this before the Republican convention? Uhh, you\u2019ll have&#8230; I haven\u2019t thought about it in those terms yet.\u00a0 What is your theory on it?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:\u00a0 Well, I just think one of Mr. Trump\u2019s things that he says is &#8220;Crooked Hillary, Crooked Hillary,&#8221; and it looks like, &#8220;No, no, she\u2019s not! Look, she\u2019s been exonerated.&#8221; And I just hope there\u2019s enough ammunition there with Mr. Trump that he comes out and just &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 Well, you see, that\u2019s&#8230; In a way, that\u2019s kind of the point.\u00a0 She has been legally exonerated, but with a lot of questionable twists and turns.\u00a0 Politically, she hasn\u2019t been.\u00a0 The FBI director pretty much stipulated that she trafficked in top secret classified information.\u00a0 The FBI director has committed that it\u2019s pretty likely that &#8220;hostile actors&#8221; got her emails. They couldn\u2019t find any direct evidence of a hack, but the hackers will be glad to tell you that they\u2019ve done it.\u00a0 But he laid out a case.<\/p>\n<p>I went through all of the things that she did at the beginning of the program.\u00a0 He just said at the end of the day, she didn\u2019t intend to.\u00a0 He couldn\u2019t find any intent to be grossly negligent like they was, and so because there wasn\u2019t any intent, that no reasonable prosecutor would pursue this, in a legal sense.\u00a0 You prosecute on the basis of the nature of evidence, the likelihood of a conviction.\u00a0 Nobody wants to go into court thinking they\u2019re gonna lose if they even could.<\/p>\n<p>Some cases, you have to prosecute &#8212; like murder.\u00a0 The OJ case, you have to prosecute it.\u00a0 But things like this, prosecutors can decide based on all the evidence &#8212; the recommendation from the people that collect the evidence, the FBI &#8212; whether to go or not.\u00a0 So the FBI director said (summarized), &#8220;I\u2019m not gonna recommend that they prosecute because no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute the case.&#8221; Well, based on what?<\/p>\n<p>But that doesn\u2019t mean that a presidential candidate or a presidential party cannot prosecute what she has done here.\u00a0 She has pretty much been tied to gross negligence.\u00a0 This we knew before Comey went through it. We know she\u2019s been trafficking in these things.\u00a0 We know she had a private server.\u00a0 We know she had it set up so she would be able to shield it from public view.\u00a0 That was why she did it.\u00a0 The Clintons and the Democrats don\u2019t want us to be able to find out what they\u2019re really doing.\u00a0 They don\u2019t want there to be an email report, for example, that shows why $100 million has been given to them by foreign governments, for example.<\/p>\n<p>They don\u2019t want that record known.<\/p>\n<p>But we know that it happened.<\/p>\n<p>So it\u2019s gonna be up to now the political world to carry out the case, to prosecute the case.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Now, the timing of this. You know, let\u2019s not forget, the Democrat convention is the following week from the Republican convention.\u00a0 So I don\u2019t&#8230; The timing of all this? If you want to start playing those games, I mean, the Lynch meeting last week with Clinton, and then Hillary\u2019s interviewed for three or four hours this weekend?\u00a0 What the hell was that?\u00a0 And then Comey? Nobody knew on Friday this press conference gonna be today.\u00a0 Did you know Friday? (interruption)<\/p>\n<p>Nobody knew that&#8230; It was just this morning we found out that Comey is gonna have the press conference here.\u00a0 So look at what\u2019s happened in the last four days &#8212; just the last four.\u00a0 You had the Clinton-Lynch meeting on the tarmac in Phoenix. You had Hillary all of a sudden show up 3-1\/2, four hours to interview the FBI.\u00a0 We learned that all of the people the FBI was talking to on Hillary\u2019s staff could not tell the FBI anything, because she\u2019d hired all of them as her &#8220;lawyer,&#8221; quote\/unquote, granting them attorney-client privilege.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2016\/07\/01\/theories_abound_on_clinton_and_lynch\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><img id=\"eZObject_124446\" class=\"img_middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/LynchClintonAG-in-AZ-TRUTH.jpg\" align=\"middle\" \/><\/a>Meaning, they had to say nothing, even though she didn\u2019t hire some of them \u2019til years after this whole thing surfaced.\u00a0 So we have a weekend of speculation about Hillary\u2019s interview. &#8220;Oh, my God! Oh, my God! What does it mean?&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2016\/07\/01\/theories_abound_on_clinton_and_lynch\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Loretta Lynch was practically almost recusing <\/a>herself but falling short of that, saying, &#8220;No, no, no, no. I\u2019ll accept the recommendation of the FBI and the career prosecutors.&#8221;\u00a0 And then there\u2019s all this scuttlebutt throughout the weekend; then we all wake up today, and find out Comey\u2019s got a presser 11 o\u2019clock.<\/p>\n<p>Whoa.<\/p>\n<p>On the same day, Barack Hussein O is putting Hillary Clinton on Air &#8220;Farce&#8221; One, flying her to a campaign appearance in North Carolina.\u00a0 Now, you know damn well he\u2019s not gonna do that if there\u2019s even the slightest possibility that the FBI\u2019s gonna recommend that she be indicted today.\u00a0 By the way, you know, people are asking the wrong question.\u00a0 Trump, come on! Get with it.\u00a0 The wrong question is, &#8220;Who\u2019s paying for it?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s not the question.\u00a0 That\u2019s not gonna faze anybody.\u00a0 Okay, so it\u2019s $200,000 to operate Air Force One and Obama\u2019s taking her to a campaign appearance. \u00a0The fact that it cost a lot of money? That\u2019s not gonna change one person\u2019s vote.\u00a0 We\u2019re beyond that.\u00a0 The question is: Why is she on Air Force One to begin with?\u00a0 Why?\u00a0 He\u2019s not taking Trump on Air Force One with him.\u00a0 Why is he taking her?<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Look, I mentioned earlier there\u2019s a piece in the Washington Post today by Chris Cillizza, and here\u2019s its headline:\u00a0 &#8220;Hillary Clinton\u2019s Email Problems Might Be Even Worse Than We Thought.&#8221;\u00a0 The piece was posted after Comey\u2019s press conference.<\/p>\n<p>It begins this way:\u00a0 &#8220;Here\u2019s the good news for Hillary Clinton: The FBI has recommended no charges be brought.\u00a0 Here\u2019s the bad news:\u00a0 Just about everything else.&#8221;\u00a0 And let me give you some pull quotes from this.\u00a0 Again, Washington Post, Chris Cillizza.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;FBI Director James B. Comey dismantled large portions of Clinton\u2019s long-told story about her private server and what she sent or received on it during a stirring 15-minute news conference, following which he took no questions. While Comey exonerated Clinton legally speaking, he provided huge amounts of fodder that could badly hamstring her in the court of public opinion.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/ghph_361wa0\" width=\"585\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Exactly the point that I made.\u00a0 He did exactly that.\u00a0 He detailed crime after crime after crime, even though there\u2019s no prosecution.\u00a0 He detailed irregularity after irregularity after irregularity.\u00a0 He detailed impropriety after impropriety.\u00a0 He detailed gross negligence after gross negligence.\u00a0 He went through it all.\u00a0 And that\u2019s what Cillizza means by, well, he may have exonerated her legally, but he provided huge amounts of fodder that could badly hamstring her.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Comey said the FBI found 110 emails on Clinton\u2019s server that were classified at the time they were sent or received. That stands in direct contradiction to Clinton\u2019s repeated insistence she never sent or received any classified emails.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>And I\u2019m gonna add something else to that.\u00a0 Those 110 emails and the 36 threads were from the 30,000 emails she deleted.\u00a0 It\u2019s even worse than it stands in direct contradiction to her repeated insistence that she never sent or received any classified emails.\u00a0 She had 60,000-plus total on that server.\u00a0 She deleted half of \u2019em saying they were not relevant.\u00a0 Yoga lessons and Chelsea\u2019s wedding and all that.\u00a0 She sent 30,000 over to the prosecutor, the FBI, the State Department for parsing and examination.\u00a0 The 30,000 that she did not send she deleted.\u00a0 And it was in those 30,000 deleted they found the 110 classified at the time they were sent or received.<\/p>\n<p>Another pull quote.\u00a0 &#8220;Now for the key question: How much do the FBI findings hurt her campaign?\u00a0 Clinton did avoid indictment, a ruling that would have effectively ended her campaign or left it so badly weakened that there would have been a major move within Democratic circles to replace her as the nominee.\u00a0 That said, campaigns aren\u2019t governed by the ultimate legality of what Clinton did or didn\u2019t do. So, while dodging an indictment is a good thing &#8212; she isn\u2019t under criminal investigation and remains a candidate &#8212; it\u2019s a far different thing from being cleared (or even close to it) in the court of public opinion.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I find this a fascinating admission by an admitted leftist member of the Drive-By Media that this dodging an indictment is a far thing from being cleared.\u00a0 In other words, she hasn\u2019t been found not guilty.\u00a0 They just decided not to pursue it on the thin, thin, thin basis that she didn\u2019t intend to do any of it.<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_124466\" class=\"img_middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Hillary-Security-Risk-C.jpg\" align=\"middle\" \/>&#8220;For a candidate already badly struggling on questions of whether she is honest and trustworthy &#8211;&#8221; And don\u2019t forget that. She and Trump are both in trouble.\u00a0 It\u2019s not just Trump.\u00a0 She is horrible in the polling data. It\u2019s like F. Chuck Todd last week in the NBC\/Wall Street Journal poll.\u00a0 It had her up by five or six, but every important internal question she was getting creamed, like cares about people like me, best to handle terrorism, best to handle the economy.\u00a0 She was getting her clock cleaned on every internal issue.\u00a0 And that\u2019s what he\u2019s talking about here.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;For a candidate already badly struggling on questions of whether she is honest and trustworthy enough to hold the office to which she aspires, Comey\u2019s comments are devastating. Watching them, I could close my eyes and imagine them spliced into a bevy of 30-second ads &#8212; all of which end with the FBI director rebuking Clinton as &#8216;extremely careless.'&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s exactly right.\u00a0 Again, look, I don\u2019t want to impute intentions to anybody \u2019cause I don\u2019t know Comey.\u00a0 He did recommend no prosecution, but he laid out step by step an indictment that they choose not to seek.\u00a0 But he made it clear this woman is not clean and pure as the wind-driven snow.\u00a0 So he\u2019s not gonna prosecute.\u00a0 That leaves it up to Trump.\u00a0 That leaves it up to Trump and the Trumpists and whoever else in the Republican Party wants to join that effort.<\/p>\n<p>One final pull quote from Chris Cillizza.\u00a0 &#8220;All things considered, this is a very bad day for the Clinton campaign. It\u2019s not the worst outcome (indictment), but it badly disrupts her attempts to move beyond the email server story as she seeks to unite the party in advance of the Democratic convention later this month. And it suggests the email issue will haunt her all the way through Election Day on Nov. 8.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>And just remind you of an alternative theory.\u00a0 That had she been indicted, Cillizza thinks it would have finished her.\u00a0 I\u2019m not so sure.\u00a0 If she\u2019d been indicted, you know, these Democrats might have circled the wagons around her like the leftist media did when Dan Rather was canned for forging documents in that story on George W. Bush and the National Guard.\u00a0 They circled the wagons, they gave him an awards dinner to protect the institution of the media and themselves.\u00a0 Tom Brokaw and Peter Jennings did it.<\/p>\n<p>When Clinton got in trouble with Lewinsky, was impeached, the Democrats rallied around, Clinton had 65% approval rating among Democrats.\u00a0 So it could have been that Hillary could have circled the wagons or had the wagons circled for her, Democrats could have joined forces; or it could have been that they\u2019d have dumped her and brought in Biden.\u00a0 That\u2019s not gonna happen now.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: This is Kathy in Cleveland, Tennessee.\u00a0 Great to have you with us.\u00a0 Hi.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:\u00a0 Hello.\u00a0 Thank you for having me.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 You bet.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:\u00a0 I called today because &#8212; as I told Snerdley &#8212; I\u2019m not depressed about this news conference.\u00a0 To me, we have somebody running that\u2019s not a RINO, somebody who will take what Comey said and go with it, you know?\u00a0 It makes me optimistic.<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_124468\" class=\"img_middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/HillaryTrump-WH-B-bw.jpg\" align=\"middle\" \/>RUSH:\u00a0 Well, that\u2019s the hope.\u00a0 Yeah, that\u2019s the hope.\u00a0 I\u2019ve seen a couple of Trump tweets so far today and, you know, it\u2019s still early in the campaign.\u00a0 But let me tell you something: He\u2019s not running any ads.\u00a0 Chris Cillizza writes his piece where he says he can close his eyes and see all these Comey statements in ads.\u00a0 There aren\u2019t any.\u00a0 Trump\u2019s not running any.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:\u00a0 Not yet.\u00a0 Not yet.\u00a0 But it\u2019s just like the swift boats.\u00a0 It took a couple days to get that going, you know?<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 Wait, wait.\u00a0 Took a couple days to get what going?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:\u00a0 Back when the swift boat ads ran.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 Oh, swift boats.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:\u00a0 Yeah. Remember it was on talk radio, and a couple days later, Fox, and pretty soon it was in mainstream media.\u00a0 But, you know, we\u2019ve never&#8230; Romney wouldn\u2019t have done this.\u00a0 McCain wouldn\u2019t have done this. They would have said, &#8220;Well, no. This wraps it up, and we know there\u2019s nothing there.&#8221;\u00a0 And, you know, she would have been pardoned, I think, by Obama anyway, just like Bill. Any crime present, past, future, she would have been pardoned.\u00a0 I don\u2019t think she would have ever served time.\u00a0 That would have not happened.\u00a0 I really feel like Comey just laid it out for Trump, and if he is smart, he\u2019ll use it, and I think he is smart.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 Well, I didn\u2019t want to put it that way.\u00a0 I was hoping people would conclude that\u2019s what I meant when I was going through this, because I don\u2019t want to impute that motive to him. But whether Comey intended to or not, you believe that Comey has given Trump a road map.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:\u00a0 Oh, and he laid it out well.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 Yeah.\u00a0 Well, I think you\u2019re right. Somebody like McCain would not have run with it because, &#8220;Oh, the Department of Justice and the FBI are above reproach! They\u2019ve recommended no charges. I cannot see myself taking issue with the revered office.&#8221;\u00a0 You\u2019re probably right about that.\u00a0 I hope Trump does run with it.\u00a0 I hope so. The swift boat guys, that was a PAC that came up with that.\u00a0 George W. Bush didn\u2019t have anything to do with that.\u00a0 That was a PAC, political action committee that did that.\u00a0 We\u2019ll see if one pops up for Trump that tries to capitalize on this.\u00a0 And, of course, the timing. You don\u2019t want to be too early with this stuff.\u00a0 So we will&#8230; Let me ask you a question, Kathy.\u00a0 You\u2019re a Trump supporter?<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_124475\" class=\"img_right\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/501657340_large.jpg\" alt=\"large\" align=\"right\" \/>CALLER:\u00a0 I wasn\u2019t initially, but I am now.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 How long have you been an enthusiast? There\u2019s no wrong answer, \u2019cause I\u2019m just curious. I\u2019ve got another question depending on your answer here.\u00a0 How long have you been an enthusiastic Trumpist?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:\u00a0 I think since Ted Cruz dropped out of the race.\u00a0 I could see that, you know, that wasn\u2019t going anywhere. Like I said, Trump wasn\u2019t my first choice, but he definitely is now, because he\u2019s not Hillary.\u00a0 And there\u2019s so much at stake in this election, just the courts and all of that.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 Right.\u00a0 Okay.\u00a0 So you don\u2019t really qualify for my question.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:\u00a0 Okay. (chuckles) No, I have friends who\u2019ve been Trump supporters from the very beginning.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 Okay, well, then let me ask you: How do they seem to you now?\u00a0 Are they still as excited as they ever were?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:\u00a0 Yes.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 They are?<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:\u00a0 Yes.\u00a0 Yes, definitely.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 All right.\u00a0 Okay.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:\u00a0 Just my friends.\u00a0 Could I say a shout-out to two people &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 Sure.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:\u00a0 &#8212; that were girls with me when we were little? Ann and Jenny, who are listening, I know.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 Yeah, absolutely.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:\u00a0 We\u2019re good listeners, Rush. We\u2019ve been around through it all with you.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 Oh, God bless you.\u00a0 I know you all are.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>RUSH: Here is Anthony in Cleveland.\u00a0 Great to have you, sir. CALLER:\u00a0 Hi, Rush.\u00a0 I\u2019m a listener for 29 years, I think. Right around there. RUSH:\u00a0 You\u2019re pretty close.\u00a0 We\u2019ve got our 28th anniversary coming up in less than a month.\u00a0 Do you realize, August 1st is gonna be 28 years? CALLER:\u00a0 Oh, wow.\u00a0 Wow.\u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":70,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v17.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>What Does the Timing of Mrs. Clinton&#039;s Proven Negligence Mean for the Presidential Race? - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/07\/05\/what_does_the_timing_of_mrs_clinton_s_proven_negligence_mean_for_the_presidential_race_\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"What Does the Timing of Mrs. Clinton&#039;s Proven Negligence Mean for the Presidential Race? - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: Here is Anthony in Cleveland.\u00a0 Great to have you, sir. CALLER:\u00a0 Hi, Rush.\u00a0 I\u2019m a listener for 29 years, I think. Right around there. RUSH:\u00a0 You\u2019re pretty close.\u00a0 We\u2019ve got our 28th anniversary coming up in less than a month.\u00a0 Do you realize, August 1st is gonna be 28 years? CALLER:\u00a0 Oh, wow.\u00a0 Wow.\u00a0 [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jaime Endemano\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/07\/05\/what_does_the_timing_of_mrs_clinton_s_proven_negligence_mean_for_the_presidential_race_\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/07\/05\/what_does_the_timing_of_mrs_clinton_s_proven_negligence_mean_for_the_presidential_race_\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/07\/05\/what_does_the_timing_of_mrs_clinton_s_proven_negligence_mean_for_the_presidential_race_\/\",\"name\":\"What Does the Timing of Mrs. Clinton's Proven Negligence Mean for the Presidential Race? - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/07\/05\/what_does_the_timing_of_mrs_clinton_s_proven_negligence_mean_for_the_presidential_race_\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-07-05T22:07:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-10T15:06:31+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/d3079d9586e3d29b799b4c54e0a0e81e\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/07\/05\/what_does_the_timing_of_mrs_clinton_s_proven_negligence_mean_for_the_presidential_race_\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/07\/05\/what_does_the_timing_of_mrs_clinton_s_proven_negligence_mean_for_the_presidential_race_\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/07\/05\/what_does_the_timing_of_mrs_clinton_s_proven_negligence_mean_for_the_presidential_race_\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"What Does the Timing of Mrs. Clinton\\u2019s Proven Negligence Mean for the Presidential Race?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/d3079d9586e3d29b799b4c54e0a0e81e\",\"name\":\"Jaime Endemano\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f266a78ed0d1df53060e64ebe68c5304?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f266a78ed0d1df53060e64ebe68c5304?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jaime Endemano\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/jaimeendemano\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"What Does the Timing of Mrs. Clinton's Proven Negligence Mean for the Presidential Race? - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/07\/05\/what_does_the_timing_of_mrs_clinton_s_proven_negligence_mean_for_the_presidential_race_\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"What Does the Timing of Mrs. Clinton's Proven Negligence Mean for the Presidential Race? - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: Here is Anthony in Cleveland.\u00a0 Great to have you, sir. CALLER:\u00a0 Hi, Rush.\u00a0 I\u2019m a listener for 29 years, I think. Right around there. RUSH:\u00a0 You\u2019re pretty close.\u00a0 We\u2019ve got our 28th anniversary coming up in less than a month.\u00a0 Do you realize, August 1st is gonna be 28 years? CALLER:\u00a0 Oh, wow.\u00a0 Wow.\u00a0 [&hellip;]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jaime Endemano","Est. reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/07\/05\/what_does_the_timing_of_mrs_clinton_s_proven_negligence_mean_for_the_presidential_race_\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg","contentUrl":"\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/07\/05\/what_does_the_timing_of_mrs_clinton_s_proven_negligence_mean_for_the_presidential_race_\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/07\/05\/what_does_the_timing_of_mrs_clinton_s_proven_negligence_mean_for_the_presidential_race_\/","name":"What Does the Timing of Mrs. Clinton's Proven Negligence Mean for the Presidential Race? - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/07\/05\/what_does_the_timing_of_mrs_clinton_s_proven_negligence_mean_for_the_presidential_race_\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2016-07-05T22:07:47+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-10T15:06:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/d3079d9586e3d29b799b4c54e0a0e81e"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/07\/05\/what_does_the_timing_of_mrs_clinton_s_proven_negligence_mean_for_the_presidential_race_\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/07\/05\/what_does_the_timing_of_mrs_clinton_s_proven_negligence_mean_for_the_presidential_race_\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/07\/05\/what_does_the_timing_of_mrs_clinton_s_proven_negligence_mean_for_the_presidential_race_\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"What Does the Timing of Mrs. Clinton\u2019s Proven Negligence Mean for the Presidential Race?"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/d3079d9586e3d29b799b4c54e0a0e81e","name":"Jaime Endemano","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f266a78ed0d1df53060e64ebe68c5304?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f266a78ed0d1df53060e64ebe68c5304?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jaime Endemano"},"url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/jaimeendemano\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213909"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/70"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=213909"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213909\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":240113,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213909\/revisions\/240113"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=213909"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=213909"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=213909"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}