{"id":214364,"date":"2016-09-08T16:18:31","date_gmt":"2016-09-08T20:18:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/172.24.32.11\/daily\/2016\/09\/08\/my_analysis_of_the_nbc_forum_and_hillary_s_lies_about_classified_emails\/"},"modified":"2017-07-13T10:27:20","modified_gmt":"2017-07-13T14:27:20","slug":"my_analysis_of_the_nbc_forum_and_hillary_s_lies_about_classified_emails","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/09\/08\/my_analysis_of_the_nbc_forum_and_hillary_s_lies_about_classified_emails\/","title":{"rendered":"My Analysis of the NBC Forum &#8212; And Hillary\u2019s Lies About Classified Emails"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/videos\/37\/73057\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><img class=\"alignright\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\" alt=\"Listen to it Button\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<section>RUSH: Okay, so there was a forum last night hosted by Matt Lauer of NBC News.\u00a0 This is amazing.\u00a0 Matt Lauer is catching it from both ends.\u00a0 The rule of thumb is that when anybody moderating or hosting an event like this gets it from both ends, that they\u2019re doing a good job.\u00a0 If everybody\u2019s gotta complaint, if everybody\u2019s whining about it, they may have done a good job.<\/p>\n<p>I must tell you, ladies and gentlemen, I shouldn\u2019t admit this.\u00a0 I didn\u2019t see it.\u00a0(interruption) You knew that?\u00a0 I forgot that it was on.\u00a0 I shouldn\u2019t admit this, but I figure why not be honest with you.\u00a0 I forgot that it was on.\u00a0 Last night was &#8212; I mean, it was a hectic, chaotic night for a whole host of reasons.\u00a0 I had all kinds of software upgrades to do, beta upgrades to do, testing.\u00a0 Then I had to watch the Apple event that was on during the program yesterday, and I just forgot this thing was on.<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_127240\" class=\"img_middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Trump-Hillary-Lauer.jpg\" align=\"middle\" \/>Later in the night I\u2019m checking the internet and I\u2019m seeing stories about it and I start slapping myself, &#8220;Oh, no, I forgot to watch this thing?&#8221;\u00a0 So I get up today, start reading about it, and there\u2019s some things that really &#8212; Hillary Clinton is lying her head off again about this email business and classified documents which we\u2019re gonna illustrate here in just a second.\u00a0 And the media, in a lot of places, particularly conservative media is just livid with Trump for supposedly sidling up to Vladimir Putin.<\/p>\n<p>Trump was supposedly praising Putin and talking about how great his poll numbers are, and the reaction to it, &#8220;What? This guy is swallowing up Crimea. He\u2019s murdering journalists, and here\u2019s Trump out there singing the guy\u2019s praises, oh, my.&#8221;\u00a0 I mean, there are a lot of pieces out there saying, &#8220;Is this the best we\u2019ve got? Are these two the best we\u2019ve got?\u00a0 We are doomed no matter who wins this. We are doomed no matter who loses this.&#8221;\u00a0 It was apparently a very sobering night, because in many people\u2019s estimation, neither candidate acquitted themselves last night.<\/p>\n<p>Did you watch it?\u00a0 You didn\u2019t, either.\u00a0 Oh, Snerdley says he didn\u2019t want to watch it.\u00a0 What are you trying to parse &#8212; (interruption) so you\u2019re not overdosing on this stuff so you are only taking a few &#8212; (interruption) tired of it last night, tired of it, you reached your emotional limit.\u00a0 You didn\u2019t watch.\u00a0 Interesting.\u00a0 Snerdley is a wonk like you have never seen.\u00a0 Snerdley is immersed in this stuff.\u00a0 And for him to tell me, &#8220;My glass was full, I couldn\u2019t take any more of it.&#8221;\u00a0 Brian, were you watching any of it or were you reading the Tampa Bay Bucs final roster?\u00a0 Dawn, did you watch?\u00a0 You did!\u00a0 You did.\u00a0 You weren\u2019t talking to your daughters?<\/p>\n<p>Well, we\u2019ve got the audio sound bites here so we\u2019re gonna review it.\u00a0 One of the great things about me as your host, I don\u2019t have to have seen it to tell you what you saw.\u00a0 &#8220;Did you hear what he just said, Mabel? He said he doesn\u2019t have to see it in order to tell us what we saw!&#8221;\u00a0 That\u2019s true, folks, I don\u2019t have to have seen it to tell you what you saw.\u00a0 All I have to do is listen to a couple of sound bites and I can tell you exactly what happened.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: The audio sound bite roster.\u00a0 Yeah.\u00a0 Let\u2019s look here at number one.\u00a0 Let\u2019s go back to set this all up.\u00a0 This is what you have to remember.\u00a0 I don\u2019t know how many people do.\u00a0 March 10, 2015, Hillary Clinton, first press conference ever talking about her private email server and the scandal attached to it.\u00a0 She chose the UN, if you recall, because it was thought that the journalists, the press corps at the UN was an internationalist press corps and didn\u2019t know diddly-squat about domestic American issues, including her email server. =<\/p>\n<p>And she got the surprise of her life.\u00a0 They were well informed, they were loaded for bear, and she had to walk out of this press conference much sooner than she anticipated.\u00a0 But here\u2019s the question:\u00a0 &#8220;Were you ever specifically briefed on the security implications of using your own server and using your personal address to email with the president?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>HILLARY:\u00a0 I did not email any, um, classified material to anyone on my email.\u00a0 There is no classified material.\u00a0 So I\u2019m certainly well aware, uh, of the, uh, classification, uh, requirements and, uh, did not send classified material.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/wbkS26PX4rc\" width=\"585\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 (Coughing)\u00a0 Excuse me.\u00a0 Don\u2019t forget that.\u00a0 She said, &#8220;I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email.\u00a0 There is no classified material.&#8221;\u00a0 Don\u2019t forget, that is March 2015.\u00a0 Remember &#8212; (coughing) &#8212; back.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: So I got a note here from Cookie.\u00a0 &#8220;Dear Rush.&#8221;\u00a0 Well, actually it says, &#8220;Hi, Rush.\u00a0 I watched the forum last night.\u00a0 It\u2019s my job.&#8221;\u00a0 Ew hoo!\u00a0 So another employee jabbing the host, another employee reminding me that I didn\u2019t do my job last night while she did hers.\u00a0 This is how free my employees are to deal with me.\u00a0 I just pass this on so you know.<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, &#8220;Hi, Rush.\u00a0 I watched the forum, and Hillary was angry and dull, and Matt Lauer let her go on and on so she didn\u2019t have to answer many questions.\u00a0 And then Trump came on.\u00a0 He was not his best last night, Rush.\u00a0 Lauer was all over him.\u00a0 Trump was being Trump, not backing down, answering the questions directly and defensively.\u00a0 It\u2019s what gets him in trouble instead of ignoring or blowing off their questions and saying what he wants to say, like politicians do.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s Trump, by the way.\u00a0 Trump does not do politics.\u00a0 Well, he doesn\u2019t behave like a politician.\u00a0 They ask him a question, he\u2019ll answer it, for good or bad.\u00a0 So, anyway, that\u2019s a review of somebody who\u2019s job is to watch this stuff and then provide the audio sound bites.<\/p>\n<p>So I want to go back again to this sound bite that starts this whole thing off.\u00a0 This is Hillary\u2019s UN press conference back on March 10th, 2015, first press conference on the email scandal, the private server in the home, the bathroom, whatever it was, Chappaqua, chose the UN because it was thought the press corps there would not be up to speed on domestic American political issues. Hillary thought it would be a cakewalk. Plus the UN press contingent thought to be totally slavish to a former American diplomat, Hillary Clinton, secretary of state, basically puff piece, puffball questions.<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_127256\" class=\"img_middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/HillaryEmail.jpg\" align=\"middle\" \/>Turned out not to be that.\u00a0 The UN press corps was up to speed, and they were pretty hard-hitting, and Hillary walked out of this press conference much sooner than she intended to.\u00a0 But this is the foundational answer that sets up everything to follow.\u00a0 Again, the question:\u00a0 &#8220;Were you ever specifically briefed on the security implications of using your own email server and using your personal email address to email with the president?&#8221;\u00a0 It\u2019s a very good question.\u00a0 Did anybody ever warn you, were you briefed on how risky it was to use your own unprotected email server to send classified stuff back and forth to the president?<\/p>\n<p>HILLARY:\u00a0 I did not email any, um, classified material to anyone on my email.\u00a0 There is no classified material.\u00a0 So I\u2019m certainly well aware, uh, of the, uh, classification, uh, requirements and, uh, did not send classified material.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 Well, now, how does that square with what has since been said by Hillary Clinton?\u00a0 She has admitted many times that she has sent classified information, or that she didn\u2019t know it was classified.\u00a0 (imitating Hillary) &#8220;I thought it was alphabetical. See, I didn\u2019t realize it meant confidential or I didn\u2019t realize it meant secure or classified or any of that.&#8221;\u00a0 So she\u2019s gone from saying at the very beginning of this that she never trafficked in classified material to now giving excuses and explaining how, &#8220;Yeah, yeah, I sent classified stuff, but it was never at risk, it was all protected. I take it very seriously.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>This is the biggest lie of all of this. To open up with this whole subject back in 2015, which is now just a little under a year and a half ago, &#8220;I never sent classified data.&#8221;\u00a0 Now, the media can talk about Trump all they like, but this forum last night, if you ask me, if people watched both sides of it, this had to be the &#8212; what would you say? &#8212; circumstance or the element of the whole night that determined who won or who lost or who looked better or who looked worse.\u00a0 This is Lieutenant Jon Lester, United States Navy retired, asking a question of Mrs. Clinton.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/j8zYxq7aDVE\" width=\"585\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>LESTER:\u00a0 As a naval flight officer I held a top secret sensitive compartmentalized information clearance, and that provided me access to materials and information highly sensitive to our war fighting capabilities.\u00a0 Had I communicated this information without following proscribed protocols, I would have been prosecuted and imprisoned.\u00a0 Secretary Clinton, how can you expect those such as myself who were and are entrusted with America\u2019s most sensitive information to have any confidence in your leadership as president when you clearly corrupted our national security?<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 Why hasn\u2019t the press asked that question?\u00a0 This is the first thing that struck me when I saw this, plus applauding Lieutenant Lester.\u00a0 But this is it.\u00a0 He said right out of the box, as a naval flight officer, I held a top secret sensitive compartmentalized information clearance.\u00a0 Had I communicated this information not following proscribed protocols like you didn\u2019t, Mrs. Clinton, I would have been prosecuted and put in jail.\u00a0 So, Mrs. Clinton, how can you expect people like me to have any confidence in your leadership as president when you corrupted national security?\u00a0 Not just trafficked in it.\u00a0 When you corrupted it.<\/p>\n<p>The media should have been asking this question for months by now.\u00a0 Snerdley and I were talking about this today, in fact.\u00a0 When he came in I asked him, &#8220;Did you watch this thing last night?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;No, but I saw this press conference.&#8221;\u00a0 And he started fuming and cursing about Hillary\u2019s press conference. She did a tarmac press conference at White Plains up in Westchester County, White Plains airport.\u00a0 I think it\u2019s where it was.\u00a0 She\u2019s got the putrid painted new jet of hers, that baby blue pink, supposed to look like Air Force One blue.\u00a0 And she\u2019s out there talking with the press, and the press is just saying, &#8220;Your hair looks so wonderful. Did you get enough sleep last night?\u00a0 How\u2019s your health?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>And Andrea Mitchell is making some comments, and Hillary, &#8220;Oh, Andrea, I just love you, I just love you, Andrea, you\u2019re just indefatigable, oh, my God, I just love you.&#8221;\u00a0 And Snerdley came in complaining about the way the &#8212;\u00a0 I said, &#8220;What are you talking about? \u00a0They did their job. That\u2019s exactly what they\u2019re supposed to do.&#8221;\u00a0 What\u2019d Biden say the other day, Hillary\u2019s got to show her heart.\u00a0 So what\u2019s the media do?\u00a0 Show that she has a heart.\u00a0 They\u2019re not gonna ask her heart any questions.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/UUN4Cc13Ips\" width=\"585\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>This is a great example.\u00a0 The media should have asked the question that the lieutenant, the retired lieutenant in the Navy did, but they aren\u2019t, they\u2019re protecting her.\u00a0 And people get mad when they see the way the media treats her.\u00a0 Why waste the energy getting mad when you know they\u2019re not gonna do anything other than that?<\/p>\n<p>Folks, look, they\u2019re not media; they are Democrat Party hacks and activists, and they are disguised as journalists, but their job is to get Hillary Clinton elected. Their job is to take Donald Trump out. Their job is to promote her. Their job is not to ask her tough questions. They\u2019re not to call her to account. They\u2019re not to do anything of the sort, and this is evidence that it took a retired Navy man getting into this forum last night to ask her the question.\u00a0 Here\u2019s how she responded.<\/p>\n<p>HILLARY:\u00a0 You know and I know classified material is designated, it is marked.\u00a0 There is a header so that there\u2019s no dispute at all that what is being communicated to or from someone who has that access is marked &#8220;classified.&#8221;\u00a0 And what we have here is the use of an unclassified system by hundreds of people in our government to send information that was not marked, there were no headers, there was no statement &#8220;top secret, secret, or confidential.&#8221;\u00a0 I communicated about classified material on a wholly separate system.\u00a0 I took it very seriously.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 Hold it a minute.\u00a0 Grab number one.\u00a0 &#8220;I communicated about classified material on a wholly separate system.\u00a0 I took it very seriously.&#8221;\u00a0 Here\u2019s what she said again back in March.<\/p>\n<p>HILLARY:\u00a0 I did not email any, um, classified material to anyone on my email.\u00a0 There is no classified material.\u00a0 So I\u2019m certainly well aware, uh, of the, uh, classification, uh, requirements and, uh, did not send classified material.<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_127257\" class=\"img_right\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/HillaryServerSHORT.jpg\" align=\"right\" \/>RUSH:\u00a0 She has told so many lies about this, she doesn\u2019t remember who she said what to.\u00a0 So she says to the retired Navy lieutenant, &#8220;I communicated about classified material on a wholly separate system&#8221; back in March 2015, &#8220;I did not email any classified material.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Now, this business on the headers.\u00a0 Look, folks, all of this gets in the weeds.\u00a0 And I think we\u2019re here to try to inform, educate, and persuade people, let\u2019s make no bones about it.\u00a0 This email stuff been going on for so long that a lot of people do have fatigue on it. The minute you bring it up, &#8220;I don\u2019t want to hear it. I\u2019m tired of it. It doesn\u2019t make any sense to me, they all do it.&#8221; And they tune out.\u00a0 So it\u2019s the wrong way to go about it.<\/p>\n<p>The right way to go about this is to point out that she cannot tell the truth about whatever she\u2019s being asked, be it emails, be it servers, be it Libya, be it Benghazi, be it climate change, be it whatever.\u00a0 She makes a big deal here saying, &#8220;Well, you know and I know classified material is designated.\u00a0 There\u2019s a header.&#8221;\u00a0 Let me tell you something, folks.\u00a0 Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills and others in Hillary\u2019s office went through many of the emails that they submitted to the FBI and stripped the headers out.<\/p>\n<p>There are actual emails back and forth from people in Hillary\u2019s office talking about this.\u00a0 Have you scrubbed the headers?\u00a0 Did we make sure to get all the headers?\u00a0 Have we eliminated the headers?\u00a0 They did this post facto.\u00a0 They doctored, if you will, they edited classified documents and tried to make them look like they were not classified.<\/p>\n<p>So here comes Mrs. Clinton now saying, &#8220;You know, there\u2019s a header so that there\u2019s no dispute at all what\u2019s being communicated.&#8221;\u00a0 They took the headers out of many emails as a way of trying to convey that there wasn\u2019t anything classified.\u00a0 They did it.\u00a0 But she\u2019s relying on the fact that nobody\u2019s gonna know this, that the low-information crowd, many of the ordinary American voters are not gonna have any idea.\u00a0 And she\u2019s probably right about that.<\/p>\n<p>But I can\u2019t let this go by.\u00a0 They stripped the headers out on I don\u2019t know how many thousands of emails for this express purpose.\u00a0 They knew, she knew they were classified documents and they were trafficking in them.\u00a0 She didn\u2019t care.\u00a0 And that\u2019s why the retired naval lieutenant\u2019s question is crucially important.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 Look.\u00a0 I realize some people in the audience may not know what the header is in an email, but every email has a header.\u00a0 Most email programs hide them because it\u2019s just a bunch of computer looking gibberish.\u00a0 It\u2019s the route.\u00a0 Among many things, it\u2019s the route an email took from the sender to you, all of the various servers and addresses and domains that it bounced off of and was routed through to get to you.\u00a0 And there\u2019s much more in a header.<\/p>\n<p>Now, they are, by default, not displayed in most email programs.\u00a0 If you have Apple Mail, if you want, on the Mac, you can display the headers.\u00a0 I don\u2019t think you can on the iPhone or the iPad.\u00a0 Maybe the iPad; not sure.\u00a0 But on your Mac you can, if you want to see it.\u00a0 And if you\u2019re having email problems, and you have an IT consultant the first thing he\u2019s gonna look at is the header to any problematic emails \u2019cause it shows the route.\u00a0 Those are the things, anybody can see them if you know how to activate them.\u00a0 They\u2019re hidden just \u2019cause it\u2019s a bunch of junk to the uneducated, uninformed high-tech mind, but if you want to see them you can.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2016\/09\/06\/the_most_important_things_found_in_friday_s_fbi_hillary_document_dump\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><img id=\"eZObject_127260\" class=\"img_middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/HillaryFBICant-Remember-B.jpg\" align=\"middle\" \/><\/a>And Hillary &#8212; get this.\u00a0 This was in a June 2011 email. Shows Hillary telling her top adviser, Jake Sullivan, to send security information through insecure means, in response to Hillary\u2019s request for a set of since redacted talking points Sullivan wrote, &#8220;They say they\u2019ve had issues sending a secure fax.\u00a0 They\u2019re working on it.&#8221;\u00a0 Clinton responds if they can\u2019t, turn to a nonpaper with no identifying heading and send nonsecure.&#8221;\u00a0 She was telling them to strip the headers out.\u00a0 She did this with email.\u00a0 Send the headers out and send it nonsecured.<\/p>\n<p>She was sending classified data like you and I send emails.\u00a0 In some cases, it\u2019s a new lie.\u00a0 And no matter how many times she claims it, paper documents that have been classified are stamped with a rubber stamp marking their classification, but that\u2019s not possible with emails, hence the use of letters and brackets like the C to say confidential or classified.\u00a0 And then there\u2019s all kinds of emails where she asks the staff to strip the headers out, which would eliminate any sign that there is any classified data within and then send it through a regular channel.<\/p>\n<p>It was not only stripping out the headers, she then proceeded to send secret, eyes only, classified email through regular email.\u00a0 You wouldn\u2019t have even needed to hack it.\u00a0 All you would have had to do is know somebody to whom she was sending email and have them forward it to you.\u00a0 I mean, it was irresponsible, and it is dangerous to boot.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 Greetings, my friends.\u00a0 Welcome back.\u00a0 Great to have you here.\u00a0 Rush Limbaugh, serving humanity, executing assigned host duties flawlessly, zero mistakes.\u00a0 Actually, actually that may not be true.\u00a0 I may have made a technical mistake moments ago regarding Hillary\u2019s emails because I was misdirected by the staff.\u00a0 Now, in days gone by, when the staff screwed up, I took the hit.\u00a0 I mean, I always thought it was a very small public person that blamed invisible staff for his own mistakes.\u00a0 But I\u2019ve taken so many of these hits over the years that I\u2019ve decided that when the staff is really to blame, then they\u2019re gonna get it.\u00a0 (laughing)<\/p>\n<p>No, seriously.\u00a0 Seriously, here, I think I might have mixed up a couple of things.\u00a0 It doesn\u2019t change the ultimate meaning, but in that Hillary UN speech &#8212; played the sound bite from March of 2015 &#8212; she was talking about her private email network when she lied.\u00a0 She said she never emailed classified info.\u00a0 That I was not wrong about.\u00a0 She did lie about that.\u00a0 I mean, famously so.<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_127264\" class=\"img_middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/HillaryemailsSecurity-Risk-2B.jpg\" align=\"middle\" \/>But the mistake I may have had made &#8212; still up for grabs here &#8212; was comparing that to prove the lie, comparing that to something she said last night. When she said she emailed classified information, the context she was talking about last night was the official government classified system.<\/p>\n<p>This was in response to the question she got from the retired lieutenant in the Navy, and he had set the parameters by virtue of the question he had asked, and that was government classified documents and the government classified system that everybody uses.\u00a0 When she said she emailed classified information in that system, that was all true.\u00a0 That may not constitute a contradiction of what she\u2019d said at the UN.\u00a0 So I want to make sure I\u2019m expressly clear about that.<\/p>\n<p>The UN speech she was talking about her private server, not the government system.\u00a0 And still she lied.\u00a0 I mean, she said that she had never sent classified emails or documents or data on her private network, which she did; but it may not have been necessary to bounce that off and compare it to what she said last night.<\/p>\n<p>Now, about the headers, I\u2019ve had some people say, &#8220;Rush, nobody had seen that.\u00a0 If somebody had seen that Huma Abedin and some other people were stripping headers, that would be big news.&#8221;\u00a0 Well, I\u2019m gonna have to go back.\u00a0 In my reams of show prep today I was &#8212; because I didn\u2019t watch the forum last night, I was racing through all kinds of written material today in the process of prepping the show, and maybe I misunderstood what I saw.<\/p>\n<p>We do know that the circumstance with Jake Sullivan to remove headers in fax, we have one email where she did ask Jake Sullivan to remove headers in a fax and send it over normal email lines.\u00a0 That did happen one time documented for certain where she told an aide to scrub the headers and then send the email, which the headers again identified it as classified and show you the route that the email took to get where it was going, where it came from and how it got to where it ended up.\u00a0 It had the markings of various classifications of security in it.<\/p>\n<p>There is one known instance where she did tell somebody to strip those out, and then that email was sent over nonsecured systems.\u00a0 Now, I\u2019m told that there isn\u2019t any evidence that Huma and others in the office were routinely stripping headers out of emails.\u00a0 If that\u2019s true, then I stand corrected.\u00a0 I thought I had seen that this morning where that had happened somewhere.\u00a0 Maybe I heard somebody talking about.\u00a0 I don\u2019t know.\u00a0 I\u2019ve got so many things going on here at one time.\u00a0 I don\u2019t want to be wrong about this.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: I could swear I either heard that or saw that today, but I\u2019m being told, nope, only that one time that you talked about with Jake Sullivan.<\/p>\n<p>What is probably far more likely that happened here is that the Clinton office routinely transmitted information that they knew was classified either from reading classified documents or attending briefings.\u00a0 They appear to have done this thousands of times, routinely transmitted information they knew was classified.\u00a0 There\u2019s no question, I don\u2019t think, that they did this.<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_127263\" class=\"img_middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Hillaryface-1.jpg\" align=\"middle\" \/>She\u2019s a security risk out the wazoo.\u00a0 She\u2019s arrogant. She is above it all. She doesn\u2019t think much of the classification system. She probably thinks a bunch of things that were said to be classified and secure really shouldn\u2019t have been, and &#8220;I\u2019m not gonna take the time, and I\u2019m not gonna put my staff through all the hoops.\u00a0 I need to send this to somebody, and I\u2019m gonna send it, to hell with it,&#8221; because she\u2019s above it all.\u00a0 She\u2019s not gonna be held accountable.\u00a0 And Comey didn\u2019t.\u00a0 Boy, is that looking even more and more curious.<\/p>\n<p>Now, most of the time when Mrs. Clinton emailed classified information she was not emailing an actual classified document.\u00a0 She was emailing, just like you would email with anybody else, she was passing along information she knew to be classified.\u00a0 This is an important distinction to make.\u00a0 And this is one of her outs, by the way, &#8220;I never sent classified information.\u00a0 I never knowingly passed on.&#8221;\u00a0 No.\u00a0 You just took the classified information and you trafficked in it.\u00a0 That is what they do.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s say I had a security clearance and I attended a classified briefing at which I was told we\u2019re sending ground troops into Aleppo tomorrow being led by Gary Johnson. A classified briefing, and that\u2019s what I am told.\u00a0 Now, let\u2019s say I leave the briefing and I come back here to the EIB Southern Command and I get on my email system and I send to my brother, &#8220;You\u2019re not gonna believe this, you\u2019re not gonna believe this, we are going to send ground troops into Aleppo tomorrow, and Gary Johnson, of the Libertarian party, is the commanding officer.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s what she did.\u00a0 She got a classified document or she got a classified briefing, she collected the information.\u00a0 She\u2019s unable to keep a secret.\u00a0 It\u2019s as simple as that.\u00a0 The actual classified documents themselves, not a whole lot of that being trafficked.<\/p>\n<p>Now, when she did that &#8212; let\u2019s continue to use me.\u00a0 Let\u2019s say I go to a classified briefing and I hear that we\u2019re gonna invade Aleppo with commanding officer Gary Johnson of the Libertarian party.\u00a0 I come back, I send an email to my brother, &#8220;David, you\u2019re not gonna believe this.&#8221; I\u2019m not gonna write &#8220;classified&#8221; on it.\u00a0 I\u2019m not gonna say, &#8220;Hey, I got classified news for you.&#8221;\u00a0 I\u2019m just gonna pass it along.\u00a0 It\u2019s gossip.\u00a0 Except this isn\u2019t gossip.\u00a0 This is classified briefing information that she received, but she\u2019s now passing it on like people pass on gossip.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/G1dozcwWrYg\" width=\"585\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>She\u2019s been caught doing this.\u00a0 And now they\u2019re out there, &#8220;No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.\u00a0 I never sent anything classified.\u00a0 No, no, no, no, no, I never sent classified documents.&#8221;\u00a0 That\u2019s where the rub is here.\u00a0 So she didn\u2019t put &#8220;classified&#8221; on these emails where she\u2019s passing along classified information.\u00a0 And she\u2019s not gonna create headers with big, bold font indicating &#8220;what I\u2019m writing here is classified,&#8221; but there\u2019s still no doubt in this scenario, I have unlawfully transmitted classified information, even though there were no markings in the email that I sent my brother.<\/p>\n<p>And that\u2019s what\u2019s happened here.\u00a0 And I think that may be the best way to explain this to people who are having trouble getting their arms around it and understanding why it\u2019s such a big deal.\u00a0 &#8220;I don\u2019t understand, so what?&#8221;\u00a0 Well, it\u2019s just like what you do when you send gossip around except this isn\u2019t gossip, and she\u2019s secretary of state.\u00a0 She\u2019s sending around government secrets to mention, and these are foreign leaders.\u00a0 Who knows how she\u2019s using this stuff to solicit donations to the Clinton Foundation.\u00a0 She\u2019s taking American classified information and trafficking in it, for her benefit one way or the other.\u00a0 That\u2019s essentially, when you boil this all down, what this is about.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Let me mention one more thing about all of this email stuff with Hillary, because, folks, it has been going on for so long, and there are so many different terms being used and allegations flying that I think it\u2019s long ago gone way beyond the ability for most people in a casual way to understand it, and the casual presentation is what\u2019s necessary.<\/p>\n<p>This is not hard to understand.\u00a0 It is being purposefully complicated or muddied purposely by the Clinton camp and her advocates to make it appear like it\u2019s so in the weeds that it\u2019s not even worth the time to understand it, because even if you did, there\u2019s nothing to see here.\u00a0 And it\u2019s just the opposite.\u00a0 This is a profound irresponsibility that she engaged in.<\/p>\n<p>This is activity and behavior that put the country at risk. It was arrogant behavior. It was behavior that she thought she was above and not accountable for, and it\u2019s the kind of thing that people have gone to jail for, as the retired naval lieutenant said to her in his question at the forum last night in New York City.<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_127268\" class=\"img_middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/HillaryHuma-Mills.jpg\" align=\"middle\" \/>So the simplest way to understand what this is is don\u2019t get caught up in believing that Hillary Clinton saw a document that said &#8220;classified, top secret, eyes only,&#8221; and was sending it all over the place.\u00a0 It happened, but not nearly enough to warrant all this.\u00a0 Instead what she was doing, it all boils down to having this private server to be able to act in ways that nobody could learn.\u00a0 She wanted to be able to shield everything she was doing from public eyes.\u00a0 Freedom of Information Act requests.\u00a0 Because what she was doing and the way she is using this private server would not stand the light of scrutiny.<\/p>\n<p>She was trading on her high government position and selling access to her using her government position, using these private servers and email accounts to do it.\u00a0 She was selling access to herself while secretary of state &#8212; that\u2019s what pay-for-play means &#8212; she was also raising money for the Clinton Foundation, which is really just a scheme to enrich the Clintons and all of the family and friends who work there and thus get paid by it, all the travel and entertainment expenses.<\/p>\n<p>I mean, the charitable donations they never talk about from the Clinton Foundation \u2019cause there aren\u2019t very many.\u00a0 When you talk about something like the Marine Corps-Law Enforcement Foundation, you donate a dollar, 99 cents gets donated.\u00a0 If you donate a dollar to the Clinton Foundation, nowhere near 99 cents gets donated.\u00a0 It\u2019s something like 30 cents does, if that.\u00a0 She was using her position as secretary of state, a cabinet-level position, for personal enrichment and selling government access, in addition to selling access to her future presidency.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s why hundreds of millions, tens of millions of dollars have been donated to the Clintons, because the people giving the money figure she\u2019s gonna be president someday, and they are getting dibs on policy, on the come.\u00a0 That\u2019s why she can\u2019t drop out. She has to try to win this.\u00a0 What are they gonna do with that money if she loses?\u00a0 It\u2019s thus been wasted.<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_127283\" class=\"img_middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Hillary-AT-RISK-585.jpg\" align=\"middle\" \/>So it stinks.\u00a0 It is ethical violation after ethical violation after ethical violation.\u00a0 It\u2019s an impeachment offense if she\u2019s still in office and may be an impeachable offense even now.\u00a0 It\u2019s that serious.\u00a0 But it\u2019s important to understand exactly what she was doing.\u00a0 There\u2019s two things &#8212; to make it real simple here &#8212; she was not receiving actual documents. Well, she was receiving them, classified, eyes only, top secret, whatever was stamped on \u2019em, whatever the email markings were.\u00a0 She was not actually sending those documents out routinely and regularly, couple times, but what she was doing was trafficking in information, and this was how she was soliciting.<\/p>\n<p>She would receive classified information.\u00a0 That\u2019s eyes only, ears only, it\u2019s really tight.\u00a0 Not everybody knows it.\u00a0 It\u2019s, therefore, worth a lot to a whole lot of people, who are willing to pay for it.\u00a0 So how does she sell it?\u00a0 Well, the way she sells it, she accepts a donation, she accepts a stipend or whatever to her foundation, or to her presidential campaign.<\/p>\n<p>In exchange, she takes the classified information that she\u2019s learned either from a briefing or from a series of documents and just passes it on.\u00a0 But she doesn\u2019t tell anybody in an email. She\u2019ll just send an email from her private server.\u00a0 In my example, she goes to a briefing, she\u2019s been told we\u2019re gonna invade Aleppo tomorrow, Gary Johnson is the commanding general. Okay that\u2019s private, super-secret worthwhile information both to people in Aleppo and at ISIS and wherever, in the Middle East.<\/p>\n<p>So she\u2019s got clients, she\u2019s got donors, she\u2019s got whatever in the Middle East that would love to know that.\u00a0 She gets the information in a classified briefing, composes an email like you and I would compose an email, sends an email back to one of her donors or whoever else and says, &#8220;Wouldn\u2019t it be funny if tomorrow there\u2019s an invasion by Aleppo by Captain Gary Johnson&#8221; or whatever.\u00a0 She doesn\u2019t write that she\u2019s trafficking in classified information.\u00a0 She just is acting like she is super powerful and in-the-know and is kind of psst, psst, guess what I just learned?<\/p>\n<p>She\u2019s trafficking in classified information.\u00a0 She\u2019s trafficking in top secret stuff.\u00a0 Not the actual documents.\u00a0 She\u2019s learning it, and, because she\u2019s been willing to take donations on the basis of sharing it, people pay for it.\u00a0 It really isn\u2019t complicated.\u00a0 And this is what\u2019s been going on.\u00a0 That\u2019s why so many people are paying so much attention is because it\u2019s atrocious.\u00a0 And for the FBI to say that we couldn\u2019t find any intent?\u00a0 The private server is the intent.\u00a0 The effort to hide what she\u2019s doing is the intent.<\/p>\n<p>I know what that was about.\u00a0 The FBI director did not want to be the guy in all of American history known for taking action that eliminated the Democrat Party\u2019s presidential nominee in the year 2016 and that it was Hillary Clinton\u2019s an added problem.\u00a0 &#8220;I don\u2019t want to be the guy.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_127284\" class=\"img_middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Hillary-Email-FBI.jpg\" align=\"middle\" \/>So he goes, he has his press conference and he details everything she did and leaves it up to the voters as the jury to try the case with the election being the trial, rather than recommend she be indicted.\u00a0 She wasn\u2019t gonna be indicted anyway no matter what Comey did because the DOJ and Loretta Lynch were never gonna indict her anyway. They aren\u2019t gonna send a Democrat to the gallows over this.\u00a0 This is how they traffic.<\/p>\n<p>Now, one other thing just to bring this home, because you\u2019re gonna hear her say, or you may remember her saying, &#8220;I\u2019ve never trafficked in classified information. I took it very seriously. I would not knowingly, who, me?\u00a0 Why, I love America, why, no, I wouldn\u2019t do that.&#8221;\u00a0 Okay, we need to find an easy way to expose her as lying on that.<\/p>\n<p>And the way to do it is this:\u00a0 Any official, secretary of state, undersecretary of state, third tertiary undersecretary for public affairs state, anybody, any public official who has a security clearance, but especially a high-ranking official like Hillary, secretary of state has the authority to designate anything as classified.\u00a0 It\u2019s not that she\u2019s just a recipient. Anything she\u2019s dealing with, with the security clearance that she had, she could designate anything as classified.<\/p>\n<p>Okay, well, then you might ask, &#8220;Well, what gets classified and what doesn\u2019t?&#8221;\u00a0 Well, she is expected to know that.\u00a0 There are certain categories of information that are basically presumed to be classified.\u00a0 And you and I would know what they are.\u00a0 They\u2019re national secrets. \u00a0Anything that\u2019s a national secret, anything that if somebody knew it, would put somebody or something or the country at risk.\u00a0 And when you\u2019re secretary of state, pretty much anything should be classified.\u00a0 There are things you are not supposed to talk about. There are things you are not supposed to transmit, and particularly on a nonsecure system, which hers was.<\/p>\n<p>Everything she was doing was on an unsecure personal system.\u00a0 She had to know that if her emails referred to any of these categories of classification, whether they were marked or not, they were classified.\u00a0 She had to know.\u00a0 She\u2019s the smartest woman in the world.\u00a0 She\u2019s more qualified to be president than anybody who\u2019s ever been president, said Obama.\u00a0 She more qualified than him.\u00a0 She\u2019s more qualified than Bill.\u00a0 George Washington, FDR, she\u2019s been the smartest woman in the world for 30 years.\u00a0 You know, she plays this ignorance card or this victim card, the sympathy card.\u00a0 &#8220;I didn\u2019t know.\u00a0 Nobody told me.\u00a0 I didn\u2019t know.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Obama even issued an executive order outlining these categories.\u00a0 And I\u2019m holding here in my formerly nicotine-stained fingers the relevant section.\u00a0 It is section 1.4, classification categories.\u00a0 And it\u2019s exactly what anybody with any measure of common sense would think.\u00a0 Let me briefly read it to you.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Information shall not be considered for classification unless it\u2019s unauthorized disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause identifiable or describable damage to the national security in accordance with section 1.2. \u00a0It pertains to one or more of the following.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_127285\" class=\"img_middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Hillary-Backward.jpg\" align=\"middle\" \/>Are you ready?\u00a0 Here are the categories:\u00a0 military plans, weapons systems or operations, foreign government information, intelligence activities, including covert, like what the spies are doing, intelligence sources or methods, cryptology, anything encrypted, foreign relations, scientific, technological or economic matters relating to national security.<\/p>\n<p>This is all common sense stuff, and Obama issued an executive order defining the categories.\u00a0 She\u2019s out there claiming ignorance or unawareness or whatever.\u00a0 She\u2019s saying (imitating Hillary), &#8220;I didn\u2019t know that. C? I thought that was for paragraph C.\u00a0 Well, there weren\u2019t any markings, it didn\u2019t say &#8216;classified\u2019 anywhere on it.&#8221;\u00a0 Well, that\u2019s because it\u2019s not necessary.\u00a0 Anybody at her level of government would understand for the most part it all is.\u00a0 And she was trafficking in it anyway.<\/p>\n<p>The scope of the lying here is broader than anything she has ever lied about.\u00a0 You add Benghazi to this, the lie about the video and the lie about what caused it and the lie about everything, I mean, it\u2019s almost incalculable, the scope and the potential danger and the ramifications of the lying this woman routinely engages in, but particularly in these areas of national security, it\u2019s just astounding.\u00a0 And all of this is getting lost as it gets complicated and tied up in exclusive language that diplomats use and security officials use.\u00a0 And you finally say, &#8220;I\u2019m tired of it, I don\u2019t want to hear any more, leave me alone.&#8221;\u00a0 It\u2019s not that hard to understand.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Hillary Clinton last night in a commander-in-chief forum moderated by Matt Lauer of the Today Show during the Q&amp;A a former Air Force intelligence analyst Pam Campos said, &#8220;You\u2019ve had an extensive record with military intervention.\u00a0 How do you respond to progressives like me &#8211;&#8221; that means lib &#8220;&#8211; who worry and have concerns that your hawkish foreign policy will continue.\u00a0 What is your plan to end wasteful war campaigns in which our peers, service women and men continue to be killed and wounded?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_127286\" class=\"img_middle\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/HillaryBenghaziCAR.jpg\" align=\"middle\" \/>HILLARY:\u00a0 Well, I assume you\u2019re talking about Iraq because of my vote and you probably are talking about Libya because of the role that I played in the administration\u2019s decision about whether to take on Khadafy.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 It\u2019s not what she\u2019s talking about.<\/p>\n<p>HILLARY:\u00a0 In respect Libya, again, there\u2019s no difference between my opponent and myself.\u00a0 He\u2019s on record extensively supporting intervention in Libya when Khadafy was threatening to massacre his population.\u00a0 I put together a coalition that included NATO, included the Arab League, and we were able to save lives.\u00a0 We did not lose a single American in that action.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:\u00a0 Now, she\u2019s a talking about the operation to take out Moammar Khadafy.\u00a0 We didn\u2019t lose a single American, but we did in Benghazi, and that is Libya.\u00a0 We lost four Americans on her watch.\u00a0 Now, she\u2019s not specifically talking that. She\u2019s talking about the actual operation to get rid of Khadafy.\u00a0 But that\u2019s not what she was asked.<\/p>\n<p>Stop and think.\u00a0 Here is a progressive, a profound, deep leftist who is a former Air Force intelligence analyst.\u00a0 That scares me right there.\u00a0 I know these people are everywhere, but, I mean, to face it like this, Air Force intelligence analyst, former, Pam Campos, she\u2019s not asking Hillary about Libya.\u00a0 She\u2019s asking Hillary about Iraq. These people think Hillary Clinton is a warmonger.\u00a0 They think Hillary Clinton is a hawk.\u00a0 To them, to some of these kooks she\u2019s no different than George W. Bush because she voted to go into Iraq.\u00a0 So she, knowing full well that\u2019s what the question is starts talking about how (imitating Hillary), &#8220;Yeah, we went and we got rid of Khadafy, I did it and we didn\u2019t lose anybody.\u00a0 Nobody died.&#8221;\u00a0 Interesting they\u2019re not happy with her.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>RUSH: Okay, so there was a forum last night hosted by Matt Lauer of NBC News.\u00a0 This is amazing.\u00a0 Matt Lauer is catching it from both ends.\u00a0 The rule of thumb is that when anybody moderating or hosting an event like this gets it from both ends, that they\u2019re doing a good job.\u00a0 If everybody\u2019s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":70,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v17.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>My Analysis of the NBC Forum - And Hillary&#039;s Lies About Classified Emails - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/09\/08\/my_analysis_of_the_nbc_forum_and_hillary_s_lies_about_classified_emails\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"My Analysis of the NBC Forum - And Hillary&#039;s Lies About Classified Emails - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: Okay, so there was a forum last night hosted by Matt Lauer of NBC News.\u00a0 This is amazing.\u00a0 Matt Lauer is catching it from both ends.\u00a0 The rule of thumb is that when anybody moderating or hosting an event like this gets it from both ends, that they\u2019re doing a good job.\u00a0 If everybody\u2019s [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jaime Endemano\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"33 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/09\/08\/my_analysis_of_the_nbc_forum_and_hillary_s_lies_about_classified_emails\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/09\/08\/my_analysis_of_the_nbc_forum_and_hillary_s_lies_about_classified_emails\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/09\/08\/my_analysis_of_the_nbc_forum_and_hillary_s_lies_about_classified_emails\/\",\"name\":\"My Analysis of the NBC Forum - And Hillary's Lies About Classified Emails - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/09\/08\/my_analysis_of_the_nbc_forum_and_hillary_s_lies_about_classified_emails\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-09-08T20:18:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-13T14:27:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/d3079d9586e3d29b799b4c54e0a0e81e\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/09\/08\/my_analysis_of_the_nbc_forum_and_hillary_s_lies_about_classified_emails\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/09\/08\/my_analysis_of_the_nbc_forum_and_hillary_s_lies_about_classified_emails\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/09\/08\/my_analysis_of_the_nbc_forum_and_hillary_s_lies_about_classified_emails\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"My Analysis of the NBC Forum &#8212; And Hillary\\u2019s Lies About Classified Emails\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/d3079d9586e3d29b799b4c54e0a0e81e\",\"name\":\"Jaime Endemano\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f266a78ed0d1df53060e64ebe68c5304?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f266a78ed0d1df53060e64ebe68c5304?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jaime Endemano\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/jaimeendemano\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"My Analysis of the NBC Forum - And Hillary's Lies About Classified Emails - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/09\/08\/my_analysis_of_the_nbc_forum_and_hillary_s_lies_about_classified_emails\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"My Analysis of the NBC Forum - And Hillary's Lies About Classified Emails - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: Okay, so there was a forum last night hosted by Matt Lauer of NBC News.\u00a0 This is amazing.\u00a0 Matt Lauer is catching it from both ends.\u00a0 The rule of thumb is that when anybody moderating or hosting an event like this gets it from both ends, that they\u2019re doing a good job.\u00a0 If everybody\u2019s [&hellip;]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jaime Endemano","Est. reading time":"33 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/09\/08\/my_analysis_of_the_nbc_forum_and_hillary_s_lies_about_classified_emails\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg","contentUrl":"\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/09\/08\/my_analysis_of_the_nbc_forum_and_hillary_s_lies_about_classified_emails\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/09\/08\/my_analysis_of_the_nbc_forum_and_hillary_s_lies_about_classified_emails\/","name":"My Analysis of the NBC Forum - And Hillary's Lies About Classified Emails - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/09\/08\/my_analysis_of_the_nbc_forum_and_hillary_s_lies_about_classified_emails\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2016-09-08T20:18:31+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-13T14:27:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/d3079d9586e3d29b799b4c54e0a0e81e"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/09\/08\/my_analysis_of_the_nbc_forum_and_hillary_s_lies_about_classified_emails\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/09\/08\/my_analysis_of_the_nbc_forum_and_hillary_s_lies_about_classified_emails\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/09\/08\/my_analysis_of_the_nbc_forum_and_hillary_s_lies_about_classified_emails\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"My Analysis of the NBC Forum &#8212; And Hillary\u2019s Lies About Classified Emails"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/d3079d9586e3d29b799b4c54e0a0e81e","name":"Jaime Endemano","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f266a78ed0d1df53060e64ebe68c5304?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f266a78ed0d1df53060e64ebe68c5304?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jaime Endemano"},"url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/jaimeendemano\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214364"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/70"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214364"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214364\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":240662,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214364\/revisions\/240662"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214364"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214364"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214364"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}