So Hillary Clinton has lost the presidency again.\u00a0 She\u2019s now a four-time loser.\u00a0 She lost in 2008.\u00a0 Do you know Hillary Clinton is a racist, too.\u00a0 She tried to deny a black guy his one try at the White House, that\u2019d be Obama, and then she tried to stop a Jewish guy, Bernie Sanders, this year.\u00a0 And so I would say she\u2019s getting her just deserts.\u00a0 Yeah, I know she is a woman, but so what.<\/p>\n
![](\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Hillary-4-time-loser.jpg\")
Could somebody explain to me — you know, there\u2019s so many things that popped into my mind last night.\u00a0 Where did this presumption originate, where does it come from, the presumption of people that believe was Hillary Clinton was electable simply because — why?\u00a0 Why was she considered to be electable?\u00a0 Would somebody explain to me?\u00a0 At the Democrat convention, there\u2019s Obama up there telling everybody that there\u2019s never been anybody more qualified to be president than Hillary Clinton.<\/p>\n
He looked out in the audience, and Bill Clinton was out there, and he said, “Bill, you may not want to admit this, but you gotta agree with me, she\u2019s better than you, she\u2019s better than me, she\u2019s more qualified.”\u00a0 What in the name of Sam Hill.\u00a0 Where does this come from?\u00a0 What was it about Mrs. Clinton that said she was electable?<\/p>\n
And then all through the campaign, when the evidence was clear that she was not exciting people, that she was not stirring people up, that she was not creating any loyalty.\u00a0 I mean, you look at the Democrat primaries, and Bernie Sanders was cleaning her clock.\u00a0 And yet after every primary or a vast majority of them that she lost, she ends up with a greater delegate count than Crazy Bernie \u2019cause we know now that was rigged.\u00a0 Don\u2019t know who the Russians are working with on that one, but the Democrat primary was rigged against Crazy Bernie, and we now know this because of the Wikileaks emails, Podesta, DNC, Debbie “Blabbermouth” Schultz and all that.<\/p>\n
![](\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/HillaryDNC-worried-Bernie-Supporters.jpg\")
But why was it ever presumed — folks, this is an interesting question to me because we had to deal with this, for you youngsters out there that may not be aware, we had to deal with this since 1992.\u00a0 Since 1992 we\u2019ve had to sit here and listen to people on the left tell us that there\u2019s no greater potential president leader than Hillary Rodham Clinton, yet everything she touched ended up being damaged.<\/p>\n
She was the first to try national health care, it was called Hillarycare.\u00a0 It ended in an embarrassing implosion.\u00a0 She ran the bimbo eruptions operation. As senator from New York, she didn\u2019t do much. And even when she\u2019s Senator in New York we have Republicans running around saying there\u2019s nobody more qualified than Hillary Clinton to be in this body.\u00a0 Well, I\u2019m sitting here scratching my head, what is this?\u00a0 It isn\u2019t real, so what\u2019s behind this?<\/p>\n
So when she was in the Senate, even Republicans, “Boy, we had a great ally in Hillary. Oh, man, oh, man, there\u2019s nobody more qualified to be in the Senate than Hillary Clinton.” She didn\u2019t do anything remarkable.\u00a0 Then she loses the presidency in 2008 and becomes secretary of state.\u00a0 We all know what a disaster that was.\u00a0 And then here comes 2016, it was supposed to be her coronation, and we know how that went.<\/p>\n
![](\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/AAAObamaHillaryLyingtoAmericaSHORT_large.jpg\")
She just has not ever lived up to any of these expectations.\u00a0 So what is it?\u00a0 I mean, there has to be an answer to this.\u00a0 Why did the Democrat Party throw all of its eggs into her basket?\u00a0 They started out 2008 that way and then somebody came along that they much preferred.\u00a0 I mean, it wasn\u2019t even close.\u00a0 The first opportunity they had to choose somebody else, in this case it was Obama, they made the choice.\u00a0 They threw her overboard and they threw her under the bus.\u00a0 They did both of them.\u00a0 Every chance they got.<\/p>\n
So when 2016 came around, they rigged the game so that that couldn\u2019t happen.\u00a0 And Hillary\u2019s out there raising all this money from all these foreign entities as an insurance policy, selling her presidency on the come, as it were, and they do everything to freeze any potential Obamas in 2016 out.\u00a0 We ended up with Martin O\u2019Malley and Jim Webb, who in the middle of the first debate realized he was in the wrong party and the wrong city and maybe at the wrong time.\u00a0 I mean, he got out of that contest as quickly as he could.\u00a0 Here he\u2019s saying intelligent, reasonable things and the stupid, idiot hacks in the audience are booing him off the stage.<\/p>\n
So it\u2019s down to Bernie and Hillary.\u00a0 And we know what happened.\u00a0 They rigged the game against him so that nobody could come along who was much more preferable and desirable and once again sent her packing. They stuck with her, and look what happened.\u00a0 And all of this presumption carried throughout the campaign, that she was gonna win, that she was gonna win big.<\/p>\n
We were even told that Hillary\u2019s campaign made sure that Trump won the Republican nomination because Trump is gonna be easiest guy to snowball. That Trump was a walking disaster. That Trump couldn\u2019t get 20% of the vote, the greatest thing in the world. Hillary so believed it she didn\u2019t even campaign, she didn\u2019t even put much into this.<\/p>\n
She wasn\u2019t on the scene much partly because she couldn\u2019t draw a crowd anywhere she went anyway.\u00a0 She can\u2019t deliver a campaign speech.\u00a0 She never had a message.\u00a0 And yet during all of this, we kept hearing how there\u2019s nobody better and there is nobody more qualified and there\u2019s nobody more deserving.\u00a0 And to me all she is is the wife of somebody.\u00a0 You take that away from her resume and who is she and where is she?\u00a0 If she hadn\u2019t married Bill Clinton and gone to Arkansas and tried to take over everywhere that guy went, where would she be today?<\/p>\n
I mean, the point of this is look at what we have been presented.\u00a0 We have been presented a faux pas, a picture of lies, distortions for the last how many years ago it was, 1992, 24?\u00a0 Whatever it is.\u00a0 And it\u2019s just stunning, and so now four times Mrs. Clinton has lost.\u00a0 And I want to know today, last night after the electoral vote count was official, have you noticed no matter where you go, you could go to the New York Times, you could go to the Washington Post, you could turn on CNN, you could turn on MSNBC, you could read any or watch any Drive-By Media outlet.<\/p>\n
![](\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Break-Through-Paper-Trump-Hillary.jpg\")
You know what you would hear?\u00a0 “Well, Hillary was a bad candidate, and we all knew it.”\u00a0 You did?\u00a0 You all knew Hillary was a bad candidate?\u00a0 Because they\u2019re all saying that last night and today in their postmortems.\u00a0 Do you realize the shock, folks?\u00a0 I mean, these people live the lie, and they really thought that there was gonna be an elector revolt against Trump.\u00a0 They really did.<\/p>\n
They had talked themselves into it, and then they wake up and find out that there were many more faithless electors who wanted no part of Hillary than Trump.\u00a0 Stunning.\u00a0 And Hillary would have lost even more than five electors.\u00a0 I think Trump lost two.\u00a0 Hillary lost five, and she would have lost even more than those five if it hadn\u2019t been for local authorities in several states forcing the electors to vote for her or in some cases replacing her faithless electors with electors who would vote for her.\u00a0 Isn\u2019t that telling?<\/p>\n
On top of that, we\u2019re now hearing that the five Hillary electors who ended up not voting for her are probably facing criminal charges, including perjury!\u00a0 All of this was supposed to happen. Michael Moore was promising to pay whatever fines and serve any jail time for electors that abandoned Trump, and it didn\u2019t happen.\u00a0 I think like we\u2019re watching the Three Stooges here or the Keystone Cops or the Democrats are Wile E. Coyote and Trump is the Road Runner.<\/p>\n
You know, the Democrats run out and get the latest, greatest from the Acme Production Company that\u2019s supposed to kill Trump and the anvil ends up dropping on their head from atop the cliff, like it did on the poor old coyote.\u00a0 Everything just seems to be backfiring on them, and it is delicious to see.\u00a0 But I don\u2019t want to spend too much time gloating \u2019cause these things are cyclical and they do tend to come around.\u00a0 But, I mean, this is sweet justice, folks, every bit of this.\u00a0 I mean, to just realize how much they thought they had this<\/p>\n
They really do.\u00a0 There are a lot of people. Do not doubt me.\u00a0 Snerdley just asked me, “Did they really think this electoral thing was gonna happen?”\u00a0 Some of them did.\u00a0 And by that I mean I\u2019m talking about some of your average, ordinary, everyday Democrat voters the Upper West Side of Manhattan out in Hollywood really thought there was something to that because they… Remember that video led by Martin Sheen and a bunch of other celebrities nobody\u2019s ever heard of? They think that stuff matters!\u00a0 They think people live and die by what they say.<\/p>\n
Celebrity opinions are how many people make up their minds, according to these people, and that video? That was gonna do it, and then Michael Moore out there promising to pay whatever it was gonna cost.\u00a0 And the media!\u00a0 For crying out loud, if you did nothing but read the New York Times or watch CNN you thought it was a legitimate thing that could happen, didn\u2019t you?\u00a0 The way they were touting it?\u00a0 The guests they had talking about it? I\u2019m telling you, the Drive-By Media made their viewers and readers think that this thing had legs.<\/p>\n
That\u2019s why there were tantrums thrown yesterday.\u00a0 We\u2019ve got some audio sound bites.\u00a0 This is hilarious.\u00a0 Deranged, lunatic women just losing their minds over the vote.\u00a0 You don\u2019t think they thought it was real and it was?\u00a0 Yeah.\u00a0 Nutty women.\u00a0 Let me give you three more nutty women.\u00a0 There are three psychiatry professors at Harvard who sent a letter to Obama demanding that Obama force Trump to submit to a neuropsychological exam.\u00a0 They sent Obama the letter.\u00a0 Who is it that\u2019s mentally ill here, Trump or these people on the left?\u00a0 I submit to you Trump is not mentally ill.<\/p>\n
![](\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Trumptech-titans.jpg\")
People on the left… My little tech bloggers, folks? They\u2019ve just given up on everything now.\u00a0 They\u2019re upset because all the tech CEOs actually met with Trump and didn\u2019t tell him to go to hell. So now they think their tech CEO buddies have sold \u2019em all out and are on the side of Big Oil and Big Pharma.\u00a0 This is just too juicy.\u00a0 The Wall Street Journal editorial… (interruption) No, no. I\u2019ll get to shrink story in due course.\u00a0 I\u2019ve got it here all lined up and ready to go.\u00a0 The Wall Street Journal editorial: “![](\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/TrumpHamilton-Banner-D.jpg\")
They are so susceptible, they are so wired in, they are so tied to pop culture and so ignorant of American history that they really thought using Alexander Hamilton\u2019s name in their hissy fit over the Electoral College would be effective.\u00a0 I mean, Martin Sheen and that bunch of celebrities in that embarrassing video did.\u00a0 And as Alexander Hamilton…\u00a0 And all they\u2019re trying to do is capitalize on what they think is the hottest Broadway production in America, and it may well be.\u00a0 But 99.9% of America has not seen it.\u00a0 But yet they think their world is the world.<\/p>\n![](\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Hillarycheated-on.jpg\")
Why would Hillary expect electors to be faithful to her?\u00a0 Her husband hasn\u2019t been.\u00a0 She\u2019s the most cheated-on woman in America.\u00a0 In many ways, she\u2019s a sympathetic figure.\u00a0 She does things that engender intense dislike, but in certain things she\u2019s sympathetic.\u00a0 Our old buddy Jonathan Martin at the New York Times — I get an email from him which heralds the arrival of his latest published piece in the New York Times.\u00a0 He used to be at The Politico, and he\u2019d send me emails about football games during the season as a precursor to asking my opinion on a political question.<\/p>\n