{"id":22532,"date":"2005-04-14T01:01:01","date_gmt":"2011-05-19T06:55:16","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2011-05-19T06:55:16","modified_gmt":"2011-05-19T06:55:16","slug":"we_re_looking_at_you_harry_reid4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/04\/14\/we_re_looking_at_you_harry_reid4\/","title":{"rendered":"We\u2019re Looking at You, Harry Reid"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

RUSH: Barbara Boxer<\/a>, by the way, the LA Times<\/a> contacted her about all these members of Congress that are employing their family members and so forth. “Barbara Boxer said that she had heard horror stories from colleagues about campaign workers who had absconded with funds, and she knew that she would never have that problem if she put her son, Doug, in charge. Boxer added that she turned to her son because he was the most qualified candidate. ‘Who is the best person to run your operation ? that\u2019s the key thing to me.'” Do you understand this, folks? Barbara Boxer has just said that outside of her family, there\u2019s nobody qualified to work for her in this great country, where we don\u2019t pay people enough money, and this is a good-paying job. In this great country with so many qualified people, she couldn\u2019t find anybody she could trust other than her son. <\/line>So you see the way this works. It goes on all the time but it doesn\u2019t matter when Democrats do it. But when Tom DeLay does it, well, there\u2019s an opportunity. But in the old days there wouldn\u2019t have been an alternative media to call attention to all these other congressmen that are also doing the same thing and taking the same trips that DeLay\u2019s taking and even more. And so what happens is in the old days, 20 years ago, DeLay would be toast. DeLay would be finished. There wouldn\u2019t anybody out there defending him. Republicans would run for the tall grass. They would cower in the corners in fear and they\u2019d probably be throwing DeLay overboard just to get the heat off of them. But now when the mainstream media uses their 30 and 40 and 50-year-old template to go after a Republican, guess what? There\u2019s all kinds of people to point fingers at the media for their unfairness, their bias, and their selective application of outrage. And then it all gets thrown back on them, and they are forced to go back and cover all the Democrats that do the same thing. But when they cover all the Democrats, Barbara Boxer says, “I just can\u2019t find anybody qualified that I trust more than my son,” period, end of story, okay, no problem, Ms. Boxer. But since Tom DeLay, as a pest control owner is responsible for killing millions, his family\u2019s also worthless as far as the press is concerned and so let\u2019s tar and feather everybody. And that\u2019s how it works. <\/line><\/p>\n

Now, this, folks, is a classic, great illustration, and why I don\u2019t worry about the mainstream press anymore. They\u2019re still operating just like the Democrats are, off of a 30-year-old playbook. You know, I ran into a journalism student. I run into journalism students all the time, or wannabe journalism students. You know what I tell them? I say, “Where do you want to go, what do you want to do, TV or print?” “Well, I want to work at 60 Minutes. I want to work at a network, maybe Washington Post, New York Times.” Of course. That\u2019s where every budding young journalist wants to go. I\u2019ll tell you how to do it. Start out small, go get your first job at a local newspaper, find some local skunk in your local community and destroy him. Just do a series of profiles about how this guy is dirty and rotten to the core, he\u2019s Crabby Appleton. You destroy somebody, you take somebody out and that\u2019s when the big guys will notice you. And you keep taking people out and you keep destroying careers and reputations of the people the press doesn\u2019t like and you\u2019ll get noticed and you\u2019ll start climbing the ladder. ” That\u2019s how it works, and I am not exaggerating, ladies and gentlemen, at all, not in the slightest. <\/line>Let\u2019s go back to the audio sound bites. Nancy Pelosi. Now, let\u2019s review what happened here<\/a>. Nancy Pelosi had to pay, her campaign or whatever, had to pay a $21,000 fine to the FEC. We had the story yesterday, and basically what happened was that she had funneled illegal campaign contributions to the tune of a hundred grand to other Democrats from her PAC at a time she was seeking a leadership position in the House of Representatives. She was in effect buying support. This was illegal. The FEC fined her 21 grand. I don\u2019t know why the fine was only 21 grand when the amount of the illegal donations was a hundred grand, but still. So it\u2019s a huge story, and she\u2019s a member of the leadership out there, is she not? Yes, yes, yes. So yesterday she had a press briefing with Democratic leaders. She was out there with Dingy Harry. A reporter said, (paraphrasing) “Hey, the National Republican Congressional Campaign Committee got to the room actually before you did and basically said, ‘Well, those who live in glass houses shouldn\u2019t be throwing stones. List of articles about your PAC and some other things, Senator Reid, they also brought up a 2003 LA Times article about your family in Nevada,'” and that was on this show last week. I mean, 2003, who\u2019s been talking about that but us? Nobody. I went out and got that story. Again, I\u2019m going to refresh your memory with it right after this bite if you don\u2019t remember it. And so they were finally asked about this yesterday and here\u2019s Pelosi\u2019s answer.<\/line>PELOSI: It\u2019s an interesting tact when you have such an incredible array of charges against you, and in fact on a repeated basis the Ethics Committee has spoken out about that behavior, to try to turn the attention someplace else, but the issue is here, the ethical fitness of Tom DeLay to be the majority leader of the House and if the members, the Republican members, find that standard one that is acceptable to them.<\/line>RUSH: I didn\u2019t hear her answer the question, did you? She didn\u2019t answer the question whatsoever. She just turned it right back on DeLay and talked about the seriousness of the charges against him. DeLay hasn\u2019t been fined. DeLay doesn\u2019t have an FEC fine, 21 grand against him for illegal campaign contributions from his PAC. DeLay doesn\u2019t have anything. He\u2019s been found guilty of nothing, folks, just a bunch of baseless charges thrown out like this by Nancy Pelosi and other people. Classic. Then Harry Reid blows off the allegations against him by saying the American people are looking at Tom DeLay, not him or Pelosi. Reporter said, “Senator Reid, do you like being pulled into this House dispute, so to speak?”<\/line>REID: The problems that Tom DeLay has are problems of his own making, and whatever the organization is that got here before us, they can do whatever they want to do to try to take the focus away from Tom DeLay. But I think the American people, including the people from his congressional district, are looking at Tom DeLay, not Nancy Pelosi or Harry Reid.<\/line>RUSH: Well, let me tell you what Dingy Harry, you can go ahead and look at whoever you want. We are looking at you and we are looking at you through a microscope and we\u2019re looking at Nancy Pelosi through a microscope. We\u2019re looking at you through an electron microscope and it\u2019s not a pretty site. Nancy Pelosi, with that $21,000 fine from the FEC, it may be chump change, but you guys try to turn all these things that you are doing and have done away from yourselves and back on Tom DeLay who has not been accused or convicted with doing anything yet. Fine. You go ahead. You rely on your willing accomplices in the mainstream press, but those of us out here who are well aware of what you are doing, Senator Reid. You\u2019re blocking the Senate. You\u2019re holding up business in the Senate. You\u2019re violating the Constitution by changing the filibuster rule. You don\u2019t have one thing in your agenda you stand for. You\u2019re not advancing anything positive. You\u2019re nothing but a bunch of obstructionists. You people are doing nothing but dishonoring the organizations you belong to, and we\u2019re watching you and we\u2019re looking at you and we\u2019re going to tell people about you. You may think you\u2019ve got cover because the LA Times and the New York Times and the Washington Post and networks are not going to talk about you, but you don\u2019t have cover because we are going to talk about you. <\/line>And you know what I\u2019m going to do? I\u2019m going to remind people right now what I reminded of them last week. I have right here in my formerly nicotine-stained fingers an LA Times story that was ignored when it came out. When you print this baby out it\u2019s nine pages in your printer. It is from June 23rd, 2003. The Senator\u2019s Sons, Part 2:<\/a> “In Nevada, Reid Is the Name to Know. Members of one lawmaker\u2019s family represent nearly every major industry in their home state. And their clients rely on his goodwill.” Let me reread this for you. Members of Harry Reid\u2019s family represent nearly every major industry in Nevada and their clients rely on his goodwill. Here\u2019s the beginning of the story. <\/line><\/p>\n

<\/a> “It was the kind of legislation that slips under the radar here. The name alone made the eyes glaze over: ‘The Clark County Conservation of Public Land and Natural Resources Act of 2002.\u2019 In a welter of technical jargon, it dealt with boundary shifts, land trades and other arcane matters ? all in Nevada. As he introduced it, Nevada\u2019s senior U.S. senator, Democrat Harry Reid, assured colleagues that his bill was a bipartisan measure to protect the environment and help the economy in America\u2019s fastest-growing state. What Reid did not explain was that the bill promised a cavalcade of benefits to real estate developers, corporations and local institutions that were paying hundreds of thousands of dollars in lobbying fees to his sons\u2019 and son-in-law\u2019s firms, federal lobbyist reports show. The Howard Hughes Corp. alone paid $300,000 to the tiny Washington consulting firm of son-in-law Steven Barringer to push a provision allowing the company to acquire 998 acres of federal land ripe for development in the exploding Las Vegas metropolitan area.”<\/line>This is in legislation sponsored and written by Harry Reid. He\u2019s writing Senate legislation that gets 300 grand from the Hughes corporation, ends up in his son-in-law\u2019s firm. “Barringer is listed in federal lobbyist reports as one of Hughes\u2019 representatives on the measure that his father-in-law introduced. Other provisions were intended to benefit a real estate development headed by a senior partner in the Nevada law firm that employs all four of Reid\u2019s sons ? by moving the right-of-way for a federal power-transmission line off his property and onto what had been protected federal wilderness. The governments of three of Nevada\u2019s biggest cities ? Las Vegas, North Las Vegas and Henderson ? also gained from the legislation, which freed up tens of thousands of acres of federal land for development and annexation. All three were represented by Reid\u2019s family members who contacted his staff on their clients\u2019 behalf. The Clark County land bill, which was approved in a late-night session just before Congress recessed in October, reflects a new twist in an old game: These days, when corporations and other interests want to cement a vital relationship with someone in Congress, they\u2019re likely to reach out to hire a member of the family.”<\/line>So not only are members of Congress hiring their own families, they have firms that they\u2019re funneling business to hire their family members, so their family members don\u2019t having to out into the workforce and find jobs like everybody else does. It\u2019s patronage either in the senator\u2019s office or in the senator\u2019s state for firms benefiting from their relationship with the senator. Dingy Harry, you are so smelly, Tom DeLay is like a rose compared to you. I mean, this is incredible. Reid said he supported a bill because it\u2019s good for Nevada not because it helped his family. Why, of course! Rely on that. (paraphrasing) “I\u2019m just trying to take care of my state. The fact that my family is benefiting to the tune of hundreds of thousands is inconsequential to me.” When it comes to lobbying relatives Dingy Harry offered the same excuse that Tom DeLay is, “Hey, everybody does it, he\u2019s got plenty of company.” Dingy Harry said, “‘Lots of people have children, wives and stuff that work back here. It is not as if a lot of cash is changing hands.\u2019 Seeking favors is as old as the Capitol, but the new tendency to come at it from the side ? through family members ? may be a consequence of campaign-finance reform: As restrictions have tightened on traditional political giving, interest groups have cast about for new ways to ingratiate themselves,” with members of Congress and, bammo, the way you do it. Hire their family members in your firm and your firm will profit immensely. “Seventeen senators and 11 members of the House have children, spouses or other close relatives who lobby or work as consultants.” This is not working for them. <\/line>This is a 2003 story that nobody cared a rat\u2019s rear end about, folks. “At least 17 senators and 11 members of the House have children, spouses or other close relatives who lobby or work as consultants, most in Washington, according to lobbyist reports, financial-disclosure forms and other state and federal records. Many are paid by clients who count on the related lawmaker for support. But Harry Reid is in a class by himself. One of his sons and his son-in-law lobby in Washington for companies, trade groups and municipalities seeking Reid\u2019s help in the Senate. A second son has lobbied in Nevada for some of those same interests, and a third has represented a couple of them as a litigator. In the last four years alone, their firms have collected more than $2 million in lobbying fees from special interests that were represented by the kids and helped by the senator in Washington. So pervasive are the ties among Reid, members of his family and Nevada\u2019s leading industries and institutions that it\u2019s difficult to find a significant field in which such a relationship does not exist.”<\/line>Now, I challenge anybody at the AP, CBS, NBC, CBS, whatever, Washington Post, New York Times, contrast this with what you\u2019re alleging about Tom DeLay. Just contrast it. Just do a side-by-side box story, list this, list that. What Harry Reid is doing may not be illegal, but what about the appearance of impropriety? Versus what DeLay is only accused of, trips and hiring his family members? Do it! I challenge you. I will not hold my breath. <\/line><\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT <\/line> RUSH: The next two are, and I apologize, but the Las Vegas Review Journal ran a story December 14th, 2003. The LA Times story I just shared with you about Dingy Harry, June of 2003. “The youngest son of Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., has left the Washington office of a prominent Las Vegas law firm to take a job with the Greenspun Corp. in Henderson. Key Reid, 28, had managed the Washington office of Lionel Sawyer &amp; Collins since it opened on March 11, 2002. He was the only attorney in the office. Former Sen. Richard Bryan, D-Nev., who joined Lionel, Sawyer &amp; Collins two years ago and lobbies Congress for the firm, worked with Key Reid during trips back to Washington. ‘He let us know in November that he had decided to return to Nevada,\u2019 Bryan said. Key Reid could not be reached this week. He did not respond to voice messages left for him at Lionel Sawyer &amp; Collins and at Greenspun Corp., a real estate development firm.” So I don\u2019t know what it means, but it just means that one of Harry\u2019s sons left that law firm so only three of them are at the law firm. Key Reid went to a different firm, a real estate development firm out in Las Vegas, so it\u2019s related to the news uncovered by the LA Times in June of that year. <\/line>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/line>RUSH: Just to wrap up this Las Vegas Review Journal story. In July, the Los Angeles Times published a series of articles listing 17 senators and 11 House members whose relatives lobby or work for clients with business before Congress. I know what you\u2019re saying here, folks. I know what you\u2019re saying. “Wait a minute, Rush, keep ripping on the mainstream media, they\u2019re the ones that reported it.” Yeah, yeah, yeah, LA Times did. Did you ever hear about it? Did Dan Rather ever pick it up? Peter Jennings, Tom Brokaw, either of them ever pick it up? AP ever pick it up? New York Times or Washington Post ever pick it up, anybody ever look into it? No. It required extensive research on our part through newspaper archives, ladies and gentlemen, to dig this up. So don\u2019t tell me, the mainstream media did this, Rush. The LA Times did. They did it on Harry Reid and a whole bunch of others, too, and it wasn\u2019t just one story, it was a whole series. Have you heard about it before today? You\u2019ve not. In July the LA Times published a series of article listing 17 senators, 11 House members who relatives lobby or work for clients with business before Congress. One of those articles spotlighted Reid and his four sons who were all employed by Lionel, Sawyer &amp; Collins the largest law firm in Nevada. After being interviewed by the newspaper Senator Reid decided that his son Key and son-in-law Stephen Behringer, also a lobbyist, should not be allowed to visit his office on behalf of clients. (Gasping.) Does that mean he thought he was doing something wrong? (Gasping.) Or he just wanted to avoid the appearance of impropriety? Hmm.<\/line>END TRANSCRIPT <\/line><\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

RUSH: Barbara Boxer, by the way, the LA Times contacted her about all these members of Congress that are employing their family members and so forth. “Barbara Boxer said that she had heard horror stories from colleagues about campaign workers who had absconded with funds, and she knew that she would never have that problem […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nWe're Looking at You, Harry Reid - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/04\/14\/we_re_looking_at_you_harry_reid4\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"We're Looking at You, Harry Reid - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: Barbara Boxer, by the way, the LA Times contacted her about all these members of Congress that are employing their family members and so forth. “Barbara Boxer said that she had heard horror stories from colleagues about campaign workers who had absconded with funds, and she knew that she would never have that problem […]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/reidcorruption.Par.0007.ImageFile.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"15 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/04\/14\/we_re_looking_at_you_harry_reid4\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/reidcorruption.Par.0007.ImageFile.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/reidcorruption.Par.0007.ImageFile.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/04\/14\/we_re_looking_at_you_harry_reid4\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/04\/14\/we_re_looking_at_you_harry_reid4\/\",\"name\":\"We're Looking at You, Harry Reid - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/04\/14\/we_re_looking_at_you_harry_reid4\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-19T06:55:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-05-19T06:55:16+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/04\/14\/we_re_looking_at_you_harry_reid4\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/04\/14\/we_re_looking_at_you_harry_reid4\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/04\/14\/we_re_looking_at_you_harry_reid4\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"We\\u2019re Looking at You, Harry Reid\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"We're Looking at You, Harry Reid - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/04\/14\/we_re_looking_at_you_harry_reid4\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"We're Looking at You, Harry Reid - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: Barbara Boxer, by the way, the LA Times contacted her about all these members of Congress that are employing their family members and so forth. “Barbara Boxer said that she had heard horror stories from colleagues about campaign workers who had absconded with funds, and she knew that she would never have that problem […]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/reidcorruption.Par.0007.ImageFile.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"15 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#website","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/04\/14\/we_re_looking_at_you_harry_reid4\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/reidcorruption.Par.0007.ImageFile.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/reidcorruption.Par.0007.ImageFile.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/04\/14\/we_re_looking_at_you_harry_reid4\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/04\/14\/we_re_looking_at_you_harry_reid4\/","name":"We're Looking at You, Harry Reid - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/04\/14\/we_re_looking_at_you_harry_reid4\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2011-05-19T06:55:16+00:00","dateModified":"2011-05-19T06:55:16+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/04\/14\/we_re_looking_at_you_harry_reid4\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/04\/14\/we_re_looking_at_you_harry_reid4\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/04\/14\/we_re_looking_at_you_harry_reid4\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"We\u2019re Looking at You, Harry Reid"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22532"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22532"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22532\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22532"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22532"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22532"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}