{"id":22723,"date":"2005-07-14T01:01:01","date_gmt":"2011-05-19T06:50:15","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2011-05-19T06:50:15","modified_gmt":"2011-05-19T06:50:15","slug":"schumer_wilson_why","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/07\/14\/schumer_wilson_why\/","title":{"rendered":"Schumer &#038; Wilson, Why?"},"content":{"rendered":"<section>\n<p><BR\/>RUSH: Mike in Lake Tahoe, Nevada, you\u2019re next on the EIB Network. Hello.<\/line><BR\/>CALLER: Yeah, greetings, Rush from Tahoe.<\/line><BR\/>RUSH: Hi.<\/line><BR\/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/truth_detector_4.Par.0002.ImageFile.jpg\" width=\"100\" height=\"119\" class=\"alignleft\"\/> CALLER: You know, I\u2019m curious. I know you don\u2019t vouch for products without trying them so perhaps after the call, if I can talk to your guy afterwards I\u2019d like to get some info on a product for me to advertise with you. But the reason I called I think Chucky [Schumer] is so bent out of shape because he wasn\u2019t one of the seven dwarves. He also wasn\u2019t one of the group invited up for lunch with, what\u2019s his name, Dingy Harry. So I think he\u2019s just grappling for attention because he\u2019s dwarfed by even Hillary in his own state.<\/line><BR\/>RUSH: Yeah, so this is your theory on why Chuck Schumer is appearing at the press conference today with Joe Wilson?<\/line><BR\/>CALLER: Absolutely. Chuck probably called him. Because Chuck is in love with himself, and he\u2019s getting passed up by everybody.<\/line><BR\/>RUSH: You could be right. You could be right. All I\u2019m going on here, folks, is nothing in Washington is as it seems. Oh, okay, we got a press conference today, three o\u2019clock? Three o\u2019clock? <emphasize>Three o\u2019clock! <\/emphasize> What happens at three o\u2019clock? What does everybody in this country know happens at three o\u2019clock? That\u2019s right! This program is off the air. So they\u2019re having this press conference at three o\u2019clock. Happenstance? No. Coincidence? Doubtful. Is this something that just got put together last night? Did somebody just call somebody and Wilson says, &#8220;I\u2019m going to go up there and testify.&#8221;<\/line><BR\/>&#8220;Chuck, you go with him and make sure he does it right?&#8221; <\/line><BR\/>No. Nothing is as it seems. For Chuck Schumer to be showing up with Joe Wilson tells me they have a relationship. I want to know about that relationship. Wilson portrays himself as a nonpartisan guy. He &#8220;contributes to both parties.&#8221; He may, but the <emphasize>vast <\/emphasize>amount of his donations go to Democrats. He was on John Kerry\u2019s advisory staff. He\u2019s a hack. He\u2019s a Democrat Party hack. So you may be right, but I just think there\u2019s more to it. I think there\u2019s a relationship. I think Schumer and Wilson probably go way back &#8212; and I\u2019d like to know how far back, and I\u2019d like to see e-mails and phone records of their conversations as they planned this press conference today, and maybe whatever else happened the past two years. If the Democrats can demand that, why can\u2019t I?<\/line><BR\/>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/line><\/p>\n<p><BR\/>RUSH: A letter, July 24th, 2003, was sent to the Honorable Robert Mueller who runs the FBI. It\u2019s a letter from Senator Charles Schumer July 24th, 2003, about two years ago. &#8220;Dear Director Mueller: I am writing to request that you launch an immediate criminal investigation into reports that two senior members of the Bush administration made the identity of an undercover CIA operative public. According to several news accounts, two senior administration officials last week distributed unsolicited information indicating that Valerie Plame, the spouse of longtime state department veteran ambassador Joseph Wilson, was a CIA operative. This disclosure was part of an apparent attempt to discredit Ambassador Wilson\u2019s findings about potential uranium exports from Niger [sic&#8211;Africa] to Iraq and intimidate the other officials from speaking their minds.&#8221; It goes on to recite some other allegations and supposed facts, and says, &#8220;I request you immediately launch an investigation to determine the source of this information and assess whether there is enough evidence to refer the matter for criminal prosecution.&#8221; Okay, so here\u2019s Schumer. Now, I\u2019m only reminding you of this because I myself am openly asking: Schumer showing up with Wilson? What\u2019s this? See, understand something: I think Wilson is a political hack, and I think Wilson is in bed with the Democrats and has been since this trip to Niger, and I think this is all part of an effort that the Democrats hatched to establish the lie, the lie, the lie upon lie that Bush constructed to go into Iraq when the Democrats don\u2019t think it was necessary. <\/line><BR\/>So here\u2019s this letter, July 24th, 2003, and I would love to know what role Wilson played with Schumer in this. I just refuse to accept that Chuck Schumer acting on his own two years ago, after learning of this travesty that this woman\u2019s name, out there, decided on his own to send a letter to Mueller. I know the Democrats don\u2019t act as Lone Rangers. Democrats get together and plot strategery. It\u2019s on page one of the playbook, and they all stay on the same page when they\u2019re executing play, and I just want to know what role Wilson had. I\u2019m telling you: It\u2019s not coincidental that Wilson showing up with Schumer today at this press conference\/ these two obviously go way back. There is a connection somehow, and if there is &#8212; and I know there is, since there is a connection 00 we know it now with this letter, there has to be a coordinated strategery going on. I also went back to 2004, September 29th, less than a year ago, a column in the New York Times by William Safire about this, and let me just read to you two paragraphs from Mr. Safire\u2019s piece: &#8220;&#8230;which brings us to the runaway Chicago prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald and his campaign to undermine the tradition of protecting the confidentiality of a journalist source, without which officials could conceal ineptitude nepotism corruption and worse. Somebody blew the whistle on the persuasion by Valerie Plame, a CIA employee in Washington, to get her husband, Joseph Wilson IV assigned to check out reports of Saddam\u2019s attempt to buy uranium ore from Niger. His later book promoting charges of lying by the president have since been doubly discredited.&#8221; <\/line><BR\/>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/line><BR\/>RUSH: We are less than an hour away from a joint press conference, an announcement between the storied Joseph Wilson IV and Chuck Schumer, where they will jointly call for the president to revoke Karl Rove\u2019s security clearance, since he outed the name of Wilson\u2019s poor, pitiful wife, and had her career destroyed, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, and if you\u2019re just joining us, this little press conference that Schumer and Wilson are hosting today, this little join double-team has been a matter of some speculation on my part because I don\u2019t think these guys are strangers. I think they go way, way back. I think Wilson is a Democrat hack, and I think Wilson is working with the Democrats since this whole episode began to under-minimum the war in Iraq and the Bush presidency &#8212; and I want to share with you, because we\u2019ve had the first hour of this program, we were inundated with normally I would call seminar callers but these were not seminar callers. A sermon caller is a liberal trying to act like a big fan of this program, usually a liberal who is afraid he won\u2019t get on the air because he\u2019s living in the illusion that we don\u2019t take calls from people who disagree with us &#8212; and we can spot these seminar callers a mile away. They have little manuals that have been passed out to them over the years by Democrat operatives advising them how to get on this program. However, so emboldened are they by what they think is the strength of their position. They think they finally got Bush on the ropes. &#8220;Rove is out. Bush is next!&#8221; They didn\u2019t even bother hiding the fact that they were libs today, so we can\u2019t really say they were seminar callers. <\/line><BR\/>They called in, and they were haughty, and a couple of them were rather arrogant and condescending while spewing their ignorance, and yet we dealt with them &#8212; and so in this interest, in this vein, the liberals, I could tell them that the sun comes up in the east and sets in the west, and on a clear day the sky is blue, and they would accuse me of lying. So I\u2019m going to go beyond what I think in this segment, ladies and gentlemen, and I\u2019m going to share with you &#8212; because I know the liberals are listening, because this program is their number one objective to get after they get Rove and Bush. I want to share with you liberals in the audience, and all of you, two pieces from about a year ago. One is from William Safire in the New York Times, July 19th of 2004. The other, a Washington Post story by Susan Schmidt July 10th, 2004. Here\u2019s the Safire piece. He opens by quoting Bush from the State of the Union address January 28th, 2003. &#8220;&#8216;The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.\u2019 Those were the 16 words in a momentous message to a joint session of Congress that were pronounced on by the wrong-war left to become the central centerpiece of its angry accusation that Bush lied to us, or as John Kerry more delicately puts it, &#8216;misled us,\u2019 into thinking that Saddam\u2019s Iraq posed a danger to the US. The &#8216;he lied to us\u2019 charge was led by Joseph Wilson, a former diplomat sent in early 2002 by the CIA to Niger to check out reports by several European intelligence services that Iraq had secretly tried to buy that African nation\u2019s only major export: yellowcake uranium ore. <\/line><\/p>\n<p><BR\/>&#8220;Wilson testified to the Senate intelligence committee that he had reassured or assured US officials back in 2002 that there was nothing to that store. When columnist Robert Novak raised the question of nepotism by reporting that he got that assignment at the urging of his CIA wife, Wilson denied that heatedly and denounced her outing, triggering an investigation. The skilled self-promoter Wilson was then embraced as an anti-war martyr, sold a book with &#8216;truth\u2019 in its title, appeared on the cover of TIME and every TV talk show denouncing Bush. Two exhaustive government reports came out last week showing that it is the president\u2019s lionized accuser and not Mr. Bush who has been having trouble with the truth. Contrary to his indignant claim that Valerie had nothing to do with the matter of selecting him for the African trip the Senate published testimony that his CIA wife had offered up his name and printed her memo to her boss, that &#8216;my husband has good relations with Niger officials and lots of French contacts.\u2019 Further destroying his credibility, Wilson now insists that strong pitch did not constitute a recommendation. More important, it now turns out that senators believe his report to the CIA after visiting Niger actually bolstered the case that Saddam sought &#8212; and Bush\u2019s truthful verb was &#8216;sought\u2019 &#8212; yellowcake, the stuff of nuclear bombs. The CIA gave Wilson\u2019s report a good grade because the Nigerian officials admitted that the Iraqi delegation had traveled there in 1999 and that the Nigerian prime minister believed that Iraqis were interested in purchased uranium &#8212; confirming what the British and Italian intelligence agencies had told us from their own sources. But a CIA analyst opined: The Brits have exaggerated this issue because the Iraqis already had 550 metrics tons of uranium oxide in their inventory. <\/line><BR\/>&#8220;&#8216;State department intelligence also was dubious,\u2019 reports the Senate, more so in October when an Italian journalist brought in a bunch of phony documents somebody was trying to sell to him about a Niger uranium transaction. This outweighed the report of a top security official of the French modern ministry who told US diplomats in November of 2002 that France believed the reporting was true that Iraq had made a procurement attempt for uranium from Niger. Two months later, with no objection from the CIA, the famous 16 words went into Bush\u2019s 2003 State of the Union. But when word leaked about the fake documents, Wilson launched his publicity campaign, acting as if he had known earlier about the forgeries. The Senate reports that in his misleading, anonymous leak to the Washington Post, he said he may have &#8216;misspoken.\u2019 He said he may have &#8216;become confused about his own recollection.\u2019 The subsequent firestorm caused the White House to retreat prematurely with, &#8216;The 16 words did not rise to the level of inclusion in the State of the Union Address.\u2019 That apology was a mistake,&#8221; and Safire is dead on right about this. As I said yesterday: I still don\u2019t understand why the White House took those words out. Bush had spoken the plain truth. &#8220;Did Saddam seek uranium from Africa? Evidence of his continuing illegal interest in a nuclear program? Well, here is Lord Butler\u2019s nonpartisan panel, which closely expected the basis of the British Columbia intelligence.&#8221; <\/line><BR\/>Quote: &#8220;We conclude that the statement in President Bush\u2019s State of the Union address of 28 January 2003 that the British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa was well founded.&#8221; Let\u2019s go the Washington Post story. Susan Schmidt July 10th, 2004. Headline: &#8220;Plame\u2019s Input Cited on Niger Mission,&#8221; and let\u2019s go now to the two key paragraphs. We\u2019re talking here about the Senate report: &#8220;The report also said Wilson provided misleading information to the Washington Post last June. He said then that he concluded the Niger intelligence was based on documents that had clearly been forged because the dates were wrong, and the names were wrong. Committee staff asked how the former ambassador could have come to the conclusion that the dates were wrong and the names were wrong when he had never seen the CIA reports and had no knowledge of what names and dates were in the reports, the Senate panel said. Wilson told the panel he may have been confused and may have misspoken to reporters. The documents, purported sales agreements between Niger and Iraq, were not in US hands until eight months after Wilson made his trip to Niger.&#8221; So let there be no doubt: the man is a <emphasize>liar. <\/emphasize>The man lied as an anonymous source to the Washington Post, and the Washington Post was forced to out him as their source, because of the Senate intelligence report. The Safire column makes clear as well that Joseph Wilson<emphasize> lied through his teeth<\/emphasize>, made things up about how he got sent to Niger, that his wife did recommend him. He said, &#8220;No, that wasn\u2019t a recommendation.&#8221; He then later said it was somebody from the vice president\u2019s office that asked the CIA to send him over there. None of this is true. So if you don\u2019t want to believe it when I say it, here it is from the horse\u2019s mouths: the Senate intelligence committee report via the Washington Post and William Safire. <\/line><BR\/>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/line><BR\/>RUSH: You might even want to look at it this way, folks. You could even say that Joe Wilson was an utter <emphasize>failure <\/emphasize>in his mission to Niger. To this day the Brits stand by their report that the Iraqis: Saddam sought yellowcake uranium from Niger. Joe Wilson went over there and said he didn\u2019t find any evidence of it at all, and he is lionized as a hero by the American left, and yet he botched the mission &#8212; and we don\u2019t know what credentials he had as an investigator to go over there and find this kind of evidence, but what we do know is that he went over there and said he didn\u2019t find any. If he did see some, he lied about it. If he didn\u2019t find any, he\u2019s a lousy investigator. He\u2019s a perfect match for today\u2019s Democrats, a perfect match for today\u2019s liberals: a lying hypocrite and an incompetent to boot, and I\u2019ll tell you what. I\u2019m just going to call a spade a spade. You know this guy is a former state department ambassador or whatever and his wife\u2019s in the CIA. Well, CIA agents have handlers and that\u2019s what Schumer is. Chuck Schumer is Joe Wilson\u2019s <emphasize>handler, <\/emphasize>folks, if you want to understand their relationship. I will bet you a dollar to a doughnut that that\u2019s the relationship, that Schumer is Joe Wilson\u2019s handler in this whole enterprise of deceit and lies. I\u2019ll bet that explains the whole thing, and that\u2019s exactly what this is. It\u2019s just nothing more than an attempt to get Bush and Rove. That\u2019s why the American left is so excited about it. That\u2019s why facts don\u2019t matter to them, and it is the perfect explanation for why this association. Chuck Schumer of all people? Chuck Schumer? He\u2019s obviously Joe Wilson\u2019s handler in all this. He\u2019s the guy guiding Wilson through the jungle, if you will, in how to bring about what it is the Democrats want, because they\u2019ve attempted to establish that Wilson is &#8220;nonpartisan.&#8221; He\u2019s just a decent guy serving his country, went over there, found this stuff, and the look at this! The president lied about what he found and so he\u2019s come forward as a concerned citizen, folks, to explain how he has been misrepresented and he served his country well and blah, blah, blah, blah. He\u2019s not going to stand for this, when in fact the whole thing is a setup from the get-go. <emphasize>He\u2019s <\/emphasize>an agent! He\u2019s undercover and he\u2019s being handled by Chuck Schumer.<\/line><BR\/>END TRANSCRIPT<\/line><\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.microsoft.com\/windows\/windowsmedia\/en\/download\/default.asp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/truth_detector_4.Par.0005.ImageFile.jpg\" width=\"240\" height=\"18\" class=\"alignleft\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>RUSH: Mike in Lake Tahoe, Nevada, you\u2019re next on the EIB Network. Hello.CALLER: Yeah, greetings, Rush from Tahoe.RUSH: Hi. CALLER: You know, I\u2019m curious. I know you don\u2019t vouch for products without trying them so perhaps after the call, if I can talk to your guy afterwards I\u2019d like to get some info on a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v17.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Schumer &amp; Wilson, Why? - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/07\/14\/schumer_wilson_why\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Schumer &amp; Wilson, Why? - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: Mike in Lake Tahoe, Nevada, you\u2019re next on the EIB Network. Hello.CALLER: Yeah, greetings, Rush from Tahoe.RUSH: Hi. CALLER: You know, I\u2019m curious. I know you don\u2019t vouch for products without trying them so perhaps after the call, if I can talk to your guy afterwards I\u2019d like to get some info on a [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/truth_detector_4.Par.0002.ImageFile.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/07\/14\/schumer_wilson_why\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/truth_detector_4.Par.0002.ImageFile.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/truth_detector_4.Par.0002.ImageFile.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/07\/14\/schumer_wilson_why\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/07\/14\/schumer_wilson_why\/\",\"name\":\"Schumer & Wilson, Why? - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/07\/14\/schumer_wilson_why\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-19T06:50:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-05-19T06:50:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/07\/14\/schumer_wilson_why\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/07\/14\/schumer_wilson_why\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/07\/14\/schumer_wilson_why\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Schumer &#038; Wilson, Why?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Schumer & Wilson, Why? - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/07\/14\/schumer_wilson_why\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"Schumer & Wilson, Why? - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: Mike in Lake Tahoe, Nevada, you\u2019re next on the EIB Network. Hello.CALLER: Yeah, greetings, Rush from Tahoe.RUSH: Hi. CALLER: You know, I\u2019m curious. I know you don\u2019t vouch for products without trying them so perhaps after the call, if I can talk to your guy afterwards I\u2019d like to get some info on a [&hellip;]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/truth_detector_4.Par.0002.ImageFile.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#website","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/07\/14\/schumer_wilson_why\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/truth_detector_4.Par.0002.ImageFile.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/truth_detector_4.Par.0002.ImageFile.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/07\/14\/schumer_wilson_why\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/07\/14\/schumer_wilson_why\/","name":"Schumer & Wilson, Why? - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/07\/14\/schumer_wilson_why\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2011-05-19T06:50:15+00:00","dateModified":"2011-05-19T06:50:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/07\/14\/schumer_wilson_why\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/07\/14\/schumer_wilson_why\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2005\/07\/14\/schumer_wilson_why\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Schumer &#038; Wilson, Why?"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22723"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22723"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22723\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22723"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22723"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22723"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}