![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/FARKASPREDICTION-300x179.jpg\")
<\/a>CALLER: Yeah. (chuckling) Not to my knowledge. Not in Nebraska. Hey, Rush. You pretty much stole my thunder. But I\u2019ve been a student of yours for 31 years, and as soon as I heard Evelyn Farkas say, basically, “Don\u2019t worry. Even if he is elected, he\u2019ll be impeached or someone else will have to take over the government<\/a>” (and who the hell knows what that means) I thought to myself, “Well, now, how is she so confident of that?” And then I thought, “Well, she\u2019s so confident of that because she knows all of the intelligence gathering that\u2019s happening on the Trump administration. She knows what the plan is. She knows they\u2019re gonna push this Russian involvement in our election and she believes that they\u2019re gonna get away with it and that they\u2019re gonna be able to accuse the Trump team of some kind of collusion and they\u2019re gonna be able to take him out. She knew all this in October, 2016.<\/p>\nRUSH: Sure as hell sounded like that to me. Now, also, let me add this. In October, before the election… I went and looked this up. I wanted to make sure. You know, I have a very fertile and fine memory. But even I need to back-check myself at times, and I found I\u2019m right about this. October is when the New York Times first published its claim that there was longtime contacts, collusion, between Trump aides and the Russians. That was also the time that Hillary and Harry Reid both said there was evidence of collusion. So Farkas had to be tied into all that. Remember, she was working for Hillary at the time! Hillary had left the Obama administration Pentagon; she was working on the Hillary campaign. So your instincts are even more confirmed with this, in terms of what she would know.<\/p>\n
CALLER: Well, and they said it to the New York Times. I mean, the whole thing has been — and they have such chutzpah to think that they could get away with this. But the reason they thought they could get away with it, Rush, was because they forgot they were dealing with Donald J. Trump. They weren\u2019t dealing with any regular politician, and they weren\u2019t dealing with a Republican who was gonna fold, who was gonna run away, who was gonna go find his own safe space and let them win. They\u2019re dealing with a street fighter who\u2019s not gonna let them win.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/Rush-Photos-SMALL-007.jpg\")
RUSH: Right. Hang on just a second. That inspires a question. Do you believe that the New York Times and the Democrat-media complex back in October and November when they start this campaign…? Do you think that they all thought they would have gotten rid of Trump by now?<\/p>\n
CALLER: I think they thought they\u2019d get rid of him by probably, I want to say, this summer. Summer of 2017, they figure he\u2019s gone.<\/p>\n
RUSH: So you don\u2019t think they\u2019re surprised yet that he\u2019s still hanging on?<\/p>\n
CALLER: No, not yet. Not yet. But they\u2019re surprised that it\u2019s not going as well as they thought it would go.<\/p>\n
RUSH: And so what does Evelyn Farkas mean when she says “pretty quickly”? When she says, “If Donald Trump is elected, I believe he\u2019d be impeached pretty quickly or somebody else would have to take over government.”<\/p>\n
CALLER: Right. She\u2019s talking maybe six months, and six months would be summer of 2017.<\/p>\n
RUSH: Do you know this \u2019cause that\u2019s a woman thing in terms of being able to estimate time?<\/p>\n
CALLER: Pretty soon? Hmmm.<\/p>\n
RUSH: “Pretty quickly,” yeah.<\/p>\n
CALLER: Yeah, “pretty quickly.” Yeah, well, when I say, “Pretty quickly I\u2019m gonna buy new furniture,” that\u2019s a couple days, but that\u2019s a different thing. I think “pretty quickly” was her way of hedging it because they weren\u2019t sure exactly what was going to happen.<\/p>\n
RUSH: Okay. Let me ask you this, since you have a shrewd mind. Do you think that the Democrat-media complex is feeling alarmed that maybe this campaign to get rid of Trump isn\u2019t working as well as they had planned?<\/p>\n
CALLER: They\u2019re very alarmed and they\u2019re very surprised. But, again, it\u2019s all because they\u2019re dealing with Trump.<\/p>\n
RUSH: Well, how does that square with the fact that…?<\/p>\n
CALLER: They\u2019ve been at this since 2016 and they haven\u2019t been able to take him out.<\/p>\n
RUSH: How does that square with the fact that they gave themselves until midsummer to get rid of him?<\/p>\n
CALLER: (chuckles) Well, because they thought they could get rid of him the way they\u2019d get rid of any other regular Republican politician.<\/p>\n
RUSH: Well, wait a minute. The way they do that is to mostly force them to resign.<\/p>\n
CALLER: Right.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/DemThumbsDownPIX.jpg\")
RUSH: Trump\u2019s not gonna quit.<\/p>\n
CALLER: Nope.<\/p>\n
RUSH: You think that\u2019s what they were angling for, Trump to resign? In what? Disgrace, out of guilt?<\/p>\n
CALLER: Probably out of frustration. Probably out of frustration.<\/p>\n
RUSH: You think they really thought they could do that? See, I wouldn\u2019t necessarily disagree with you. I think all these… They\u2019ve got this pipe dream that Trump\u2019s gonna go. They\u2019re not —<\/p>\n
CALLER: Yup.<\/p>\n
RUSH: I mean, if they\u2019re not… (sigh) I don\u2019t think they know how. It\u2019s just a belief they have, almost like a religious-faith belief that Trump can\u2019t last, that Trump\u2019s gonna go.<\/p>\n
CALLER: Yes.<\/p>\n
RUSH: Interesting. Well, look, I\u2019m glad you called, Kate. Thanks much.<\/p>\n
CALLER: Thank you.<\/p>\n
RUSH: The Evelyn Farkas… This woman\u2019s a gold mine. I mean, this woman is divulging… Every time she opens her mouth, she\u2019s giving the game away. “Well, don\u2019t worry about it, you people here at the Warsaw Defense Council. Even if this guy does win…” So that means they\u2019re open to the possibility he can win, which I think is true. I think all this stuff that he didn\u2019t have a chance and that Hillary was gonna win in a landslide? I think they were going through mixed emotions.<\/p>\n
Their intellect, their head and their polling data was telling them that it\u2019s just gonna be a slam dunk. But their hearts were looking at all the Trump rally crowds and the fact that Hillary couldn\u2019t duplicate any of that, and Hillary stumbles and nearly slips to the curb trying to get in a giant Mercedes van. All these things that gave them pause and doubt. Mrs. Clinton\u2019s campaign? She wasn\u2019t going to states they thought were a lock. So they were conflicted. But at the end of it all, even on election night, I think they still believe they\u2019re gonna win in a landslide.<\/p>\n
But Evelyn Farkas is admitting that there was some doubt about it and that they were already planning for the eventuality that Trump won. I don\u2019t think… Folks, none of this is a revealing shock per se. We\u2019ve witnessed it. We have watched it take place. It\u2019s just that they\u2019re confirming it for us. The Susan Rice news. The Evelyn Farkas divulgences. I mean, we are having all of this stuff confirmed for us every day by the media and the Democrat Party\u2019s behavior in and of itself.<\/p>\n
Mark in Fort Worth, Texas, you\u2019re next, and it\u2019s great to have you. How are you?<\/p>\n
CALLER: I\u2019m great, Rush. Dittos from the great state. Playing off something that you mentioned in the first hour when you said that the New York Times has had this story for at least the last 48 hours if not longer. It tells me something that I think is really important, and that\u2019s something that\u2019s not going on. If they\u2019ve had this news for that long and there\u2019s still no coordinated response, no coordinated talking points, no narrative that\u2019s been constructed to rebuff all of this? That means they know it\u2019s true and they really don\u2019t have any way to argue back against it. One of the reasons that they love being so intertwined between the party and the media is everybody gets a heads up so that everybody can create the narrative so they\u2019ve got a unified response.<\/p>\n
RUSH: You know, this is an interesting observation. There is no media chorus. In other words, nobody, there is no phrase —<\/p>\n
CALLER: There\u2019s not a narrative.<\/p>\n
RUSH: Right.<\/p>\n
CALLER: There\u2019s not a narrative.<\/p>\n
CALLER: Exactly.<\/p>\n RUSH: That\u2019s your point.<\/p>\n CALLER: Exactly.<\/p>\n RUSH: Yeah. Yeah. Great call.<\/p>\n CALLER: And that\u2019s also one of the reasons that Nunes went straight to the White House instead of sharing that information with Pencil Neck. Because if he shares that information with Pencil Neck, they\u2019ve got the information they need to create a narrative and to respond to it.<\/p>\n RUSH: Yeah.<\/p>\n CALLER: So he goes straight to the White House.<\/p>\n RUSH: But Pencil Neck saw it Friday. Pencil Neck went up there and saw it. In the middle of last week, Pencil Neck finally couldn\u2019t contain himself, is out there claiming that there is proof of a collusion between the Russians and Trump. He couldn\u2019t help himself. Then he went up and saw it on Friday, what Nunes saw, goes on the Sunday shows and has to walk it back, saying (paraphrasing), “We still don\u2019t have any definitive evidence or proof. We need to keep investigating.”<\/p>\n They have nothing, because there isn\u2019t anything. How long has this been going on? This has been going on at least a year, according to the news on Susan Rice, that the surveillance of people by the Regime hoping to Hoover up Trump officials in that intelligence, that\u2019s a yearlong operation. And the best they\u2019ve got is a phony dossier claiming that Trump hired a bunch of prostitutes to urinate on Michelle and Barack\u2019s bed at a Moscow hotel. That\u2019s it! And that thing\u2019s made up.<\/p>\n You would think after a year, if they had collusion evidence, that we would know about it. They would not have been able to withhold it and contain themselves. There isn\u2019t any evidence. That\u2019s why this is all getting out of hand, folks. I know, I know, every time I embark on the discussion of a theory of how anything like this is gonna come back and bite the media, I hear from you. I hear from you. You send me email, “You\u2019re forgetting what you tell us! You always tell us they always win. You always tell us it\u2019s never gonna change. And then here you are thinking that they\u2019re damaging themselves.”<\/p>\n And I do, folks. I do think they\u2019re damaging themselves. CNN doesn\u2019t have any audience, for example. But I think in the long-term big scheme of things they are damaging themselves. How that\u2019s gonna end up manifesting itself, I can\u2019t begin to tell you. But these are little things that collectively add up, such as something I mentioned previously. Every year until the last two years the Democrats loved the Russians, and they loved the Soviet Union, and they loved the KGB, and they loved the instruments of authoritarian power wherever they found it around the world.<\/p>\n This whole story is causing them to do 180-degree shifts of loyalty. And that\u2019s what I mean by discombobulated, because the sole focus they have been consumed with — they\u2019re a big hate group now, and they\u2019ve been consumed with their hatred for Trump, consumed with their hatred for the American people who voted for Trump, consumed with their hatred for open elections, consumed by their hatred of the fact they can\u2019t get rid of Trump.<\/p>\n Folks, the only thing I\u2019m telling you is, in terms of humanity, that you do not build good, positive, growing movements from a foundation or platform of hate. And they are consumed by it now. They are ravaged by it, and they have become completely irrational to the point of even openly acknowledging the abandonment of the sacred principles of journalism in order to stop Donald Trump.<\/p>\n BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n RUSH: All right. Here is Al in Orleans, Massachusetts. Welcome to the EIB Network. Hi.<\/p>\n CALLER: Thank you for taking my call, Rush. I have a theory. It\u2019s a little bit different, which is that this is ordered from the president of the United States based on a personal vendetta for the birther conspiracy, and it goes like this. Mr. Obama, President Obama did not think that Trump was going to win, so they wanted to find evidence of corruption in his business practices or anywhere so they could have a show trial after the election when Hillary wins to make sure that nobody ever challenges the deep state establishment ever again like Trump did and make an example out of him. And that they had no concept of him winning and Rice was preparing transcripts of the phone calls and everything for presentations to the president and his staff.<\/p>\n Now, I know I have said that even as late as nine p.m. on election night, they still thought they were gonna win in a landslide. I think that that\u2019s true of media people. They were doing the polls. The Clinton campaign was feeding them the drivel that all was looking good. But I think if you look closely, that you could find evidence that they, the Clinton campaign, knew she was gonna lose. I think Evelyn Farkas has given it away here with that bite we just found from last October.<\/p>\n Why even be contemplating about getting rid of Trump? If you really think you\u2019re gonna win here in a landslide, what in the world are you even thinking about getting rid of Trump for, after he\u2019s elected? Didn\u2019t they cancel celebratory fireworks or something? The fireworks on election night, they cancelled that two days before the election. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. I think the Hillary camp knew. So a lot of this outrage has had to be manufactured to make it look like they thought they were a slam dunk and had it stolen from them.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" RUSH: If you really think you're gonna win here in a landslide, what in the world are you even thinking about getting rid of Trump for, after he's elected? Didn't they cancel celebratory fireworks or something? The fireworks on election night, they cancelled that two days before the election. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. I think the Hillary camp knew. So a lot of this outrage has had to be manufactured to make it look like they thought they were a slam dunk and had it stolen from them.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":49,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[12,1],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/00-Stop-The-Tape.jpg\")
<\/a>RUSH: There\u2019s not a narrative. There\u2019s not a phrase. There\u2019s not a word that everybody in the media\u2019s using to describe this as there is for everything, “Oh, that looks bad. Oh, Cheney has gravitas.” These media montages we put together<\/a> that display the coordination, there is no coordination here on the, quote, unquote, defense of Susan Rice. About all we\u2019re getting is from CNN, “Don\u2019t even watch it! Don\u2019t even pay attention to it! It\u2019s a distraction! Trump colluded with the Russians, and this is a distraction. We\u2019re not even gonna report it.” They\u2019re not seeking to defend her.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/HillaryWikileaks-101716-b.jpg\")
Now they hate the Russians. I don\u2019t believe that. I don\u2019t believe they\u2019ve actually turned into us on the Russians. Do you? We\u2019re supposed to sit here and believe that they have become anti-communist, anti-authoritarian, anti-Russian, after decades and decades of being pro all of that? When Julian Assange first surfaced and began leaking the Edward Snowden stuff, they loved Assange and they loved Snowden because he was betraying authoritarian governments, although there was Obama. Now they\u2019re embracing all these people that they used to despise and dislike.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/AAAObamaHillaryLyingtoAmericaSHORT_large.jpg\")
RUSH: Wow. Show trial of Trump after he loses to dissuade any upstart outsider from even thinking about trying it again. And that Susan Rice was preparing the transcript — (laughing) Well, there\u2019s no way of knowing that. I can see if you have a certain impression of Obama that such a thing would happen. I have a different theory about one aspect of what you said. I\u2019ve been going back and forth on what I really think about what they really thought, the days leading up to the election and election night.<\/p>\n