{"id":30468,"date":"2008-09-23T01:01:01","date_gmt":"2011-05-19T03:20:12","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2011-05-19T03:20:12","modified_gmt":"2011-05-19T03:20:12","slug":"mrs_clinton_s_revisionist_history","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/23\/mrs_clinton_s_revisionist_history\/","title":{"rendered":"Mrs. Clinton\u2019s Revisionist History"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

RUSH: Mrs. Clinton this morning on the Today Show today, Matt Lauer. ‘So who would qualify to have their mortgage purchased?\u2019<\/p>\n

HILLARY: If you look at what the, uh, model is back from the Great Depression, the Treasury ended up making a profit for the country. That\u2019s why I\u2019ve been proposing this model for months now, because I think we\u2019re going to have do it. Uh, there is no doubt in my mind that we have to stabilize the markets. There\u2019s a consensus about that in Washington.<\/p>\n

RUSH: This is a woman who couldn\u2019t stabilize her campaign, folks. This is a woman who is still in debt, who was running up bills and spending money that she didn\u2019t have, and it was all given to her. She spent so much, she had to loan herself money from what she and Bill have earned — made, whatever — in their retirement from the White House. But that wasn\u2019t all. The next one is good. This is CNN\u2019s American Morning. John Roberts says to Mrs. Clinton, ‘Now, if you go back to 1999, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act that a lot of people said started this whole ball rolling, in the House, 138 Democrats voted for that. One Democrat voted for it in the Senate. Your husband signed it. Are Democrats scot-free here on this housing business?\u2019<\/p>\n

HILLARY: The great bulk of the responsibility rests, uh, with this administration and with the ideology that the Republicans have been promoting since they took over the Congress in 1995. You know, they never met a regulation that they thought was worth implementing.<\/p>\n

ROBERTS: Many Democrats voted to take those rules away. Your husband could have vetoed the bill, even though it might have been overridden. He could have done it symbolically. Instead he chose to sign it.<\/p>\n

HILLARY: But there were reasons, there were positive reasons. What I believe the failure in \u201999 was, is that once you removed some of those barriers between banks and investment banks and the kind of business that could be done by banks, that there needed to be a new regulatory framework. But there was no appetite in the Republican Congress or with a Republican president to take the second step.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Flat-out lie. This is what it\u2019s to just flat-out lie. I blew this out of the water yesterday. The Republicans… I had this from Gateway Pundit yesterday. I didn\u2019t get around to it. Twelve different times this administration has tried to do something about what everybody knew was coming with Fannie and Freddie and the Democrats — including Mrs. Clinton — stood in the way. Her husband is at the front end of this, along with Jimmy Carter, and they\u2019re trying to slough this off on Bush and supply-side economics. They\u2019re lying through their teeth. They are the culprits here. They\u2019re the ones that need to be testifying. They\u2019re the ones that need to be answering questions today, not asking them. <\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: We\u2019re going to play this sound bite again. I\u2019m not going to get to it right now. I\u2019m going to go back to it. When Mrs. Clinton said that what her husband had nothing to do with this business, on the mortgage business, and declaring that actively. There was an interview Friday. Robert Rubin said that the law that Democrats are now dumping all over, it\u2019s a Phil Gramm law with Jim Leach and Thomas Bliley. I forget the name. It was bank deregulation law, 1999, which allowed investment banks and standards banks to combine operations and so forth. Bob Rubin said it is not true. That had no impact on this at all. Obama is out echoing what Hillary is saying. Obama is dumping on Gramm because Gramm was an economic advisor to McCain, and they\u2019re dumping on this piece of legislation. <\/p>\n

This is it, and this is my point about there aren\u2019t any congressional hearings because they can\u2019t find a Republican to dump on. The closest they can get is Phil Gramm and this banking deregulation law 1999. It\u2019s as close as they can get. But the problem is Obama\u2019s campaign is being sabotaged by everybody. It\u2019s being sabotaged by Biden, now being sabotaged — and of course Obama is sabotaging himself just by showing up places — and now being sabotaged by Bob Rubin, who said, ‘Look, that bill that Phil Gramm was part of had no impact, zero, quote, unquote, on the current crisis.\u2019 It was just last week that Obama was down here in Miami, University of Miami Coral Gables, and had Laura D\u2019Andrea Tyson of the Clinton administration standing next to him as well as Bob Rubin. <\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: I want to revisit this Hillary Clinton bite from this morning on CNN. John Roberts is talking to her about the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. Now, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act 1999, this is what the Democrats, Lanny Davis, the Wall Street Journal, they\u2019re trying to find a Republican to pin this on, they\u2019re trying to find anything. It\u2019s like I tell you, there would have been hearings blaming Republicans for this financial crisis starting two weeks ago if there were any Republicans the Democrats could have found. This is as close as they can get to it but we\u2019re going to nuke this out of the water, a little Iranian lingo there. We\u2019re going to nuke \u2019em on this. This is all they\u2019ve got pointing at Phil Gramm because he was a McCain advisor. So John Roberts says to Mrs. Clinton, ‘If you go back to 1999, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act that a lot of people said started this whole ball rolling, the House, 138 Democrats voted for it, one Democrat voted for it in the Senate. Your husband signed it. Are Democrats scot-free here with all this?\u2019<\/line> <\/line>HILLARY: The great bulk of the responsibility rests with this administration and with the ideology that the Republicans have been promoting since they took over the Congress in 1995. You know, they never met a regulation that they thought was worth implementing.<\/line> <\/line>ROBERTS: Many Democrats voted to take those rules away. Your husband could have vetoed the bill even though it might have been overridden, he could have done it symbolically, instead he chose to sign it.<\/line> <\/line>HILLARY: But there were reasons. There were positive reasons. What I believe the failure in \u201999 was is that once you remove some of those barriers between banks and investment banks and the kind of business that could be done by banks, that there needed to be a new regulatory framework, but there was no appetite in the Republican Congress or with a Republican president to take the second step.<\/line> <\/line>RUSH: All right, now, two things on this, because Mrs. Clinton, like all the Democrats, is trying to make something out of nothing here. There is nothing here and as a result she is lying through her teeth again. The New York Times, November 13th, 1999, had a story: ‘Clinton signs legislation overhauling banking laws,\u2019 and there is a picture of Clinton with the biggest grin on his face surrounded by senators that supported this thing. Clinton\u2019s financial services modernization act is what they referred to this. ‘President Clinton signed into law a sweeping overhaul of Depression era banking laws. ‘This legislation is truly historic. We have done right by the American people.” So Clinton was all excited about this, New York Times, November 13th, 1999. Now, there is another story, and you may have seen this. This is the Chicago Sun-Times, the headline of the story: ‘Uncharacteristically Low Turnout for Obama Rally in Green Bay. McCain-Palin drew 4,000 more supporters at the same venue a week ago. … The numbers in Wisconsin and Minnesota are getting close enough that the Obama campaign closed its 11 campaign offices in North Dakota and moved the 50 staffers there to these two states.\u2019<\/line><\/p>\n

His 50-state strategery is out the window and he\u2019s already blown a lot of money in some of these states that are no longer competitive for him. But if you dig further here, Obama said this at his Green Bay rally: ”When it comes to regulatory reform, Sen. McCain has fought time and time again against the commonsense rules of the road that could\u2019ve prevented this crisis. His economic plan was written by Phil Gramm, the architect in the US Senate of the deregulatory steps that helped cause this mess.\u2019 The audience booed Gramm\u2019s name, as they did McCain\u2019s and Palin\u2019s.\u2019 However, Robert Rubin in the Washington Post directly undercut it because Rubin basically said that this bill had zero effect. The bill that Hillary said Republicans are responsible for, the bill that Bill Clinton signed, that everybody is so happy about that Clinton thought it was the great getting rid of Depression-era laws, Obama was undercut by Rubin, who said that the effect of the 1999 law that Phil Gramm authored that Bill Clinton signed had nothing to do with the present crisis. Now, why? Why would Rubin say it? Rubin is going to circle the wagons and protect Clinton. <\/p>\n

Now, this is a fascinating thing to consider. You\u2019ve got a Democrat running for president, Barack Obama. Obama is out trashing the only Republican they can find to come anywhere close to this financial mess, and that\u2019s Phil Gramm back in 1999, nine years ago. What\u2019s happening is that Clinton and Jimmy Carter, the Democrats in Congress, are getting all the heat on this, not yet in the Drive-Bys, but everywhere else, in every other media, they\u2019re taking the hit on this. The Clinton people — Rubin, Gorelick, I don\u2019t care who — circle the wagons around themselves and the Clinton administration. Robert Rubin had a choice: ‘Do I support the contention of the current Democrat presidential candidate, or do I save Bill Clinton\u2019s legacy and mine? I was Treasury secretary.\u2019 And Rubin threw Obama under the bus by saying Obama and his criticism of Phil Gramm had nothing to do, this bill had nothing to do with the current crisis. And don\u2019t forget Rubin is now at or did, for a time, run Citibank. They benefited from that rule change as well. They became a juggernaut by virtue of this deregulation until, of course, they got their own stock price problems, and Rubin was brought in to fix those and hasn\u2019t quite pulled off the magic again. Ahem, ahem. <\/p>\n

Don\u2019t worry, folks, I have a secure and safe way outta here. But I just find it fascinating, given the choice — and it really isn\u2019t that big a choice because the Clinton people do not want Obama to win. It\u2019s just that simple. If Obama wins, bye-bye Hillary and a rebirth of the Clinton Camelot. So it\u2019s just fascinating to watch all this shake down. I mean you\u2019ve got Biden throwing Obama under the bus. I wouldn\u2019t be surprised if J. Wright\u2019s next. We haven\u2019t heard the last of him. He\u2019s out preaching.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Here\u2019s Boyd in Waynesboro, Pennsylvania. Boyd, thank you el mucho for waiting. Welcome to the program.<\/line> <\/line>CALLER: Hi, Rush.<\/line> <\/line>RUSH: Hi.<\/line> <\/line>CALLER: Thank you for taking my call, and it\u2019s a pleasure to talk with you, Rush. I wanted to make a point about the bailout of $700 billion, you know, they\u2019re having hearings about right now to bail out, you know, the Fannie Mae and the Freddie Mac and of course insurance company AIG, and my point kind of dovetails into your first hour where you were kind of making a point about the common person having a mortgage and then end up losing it because they can\u2019t afford it. Well, my point is the mortgage bailout is to give the — Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac more money to lend. Well, that, to me, seems like, okay, they have more money to lend, but why wouldn\u2019t the government bail out the person, you know, the everyday person who has the mortgage problem, give them the money to pay their mortgages.<\/line> <\/line>RUSH: Well, that\u2019s what Barney Frank wants to do. He wants to protect people that are foreclosed on so they can stay in their houses. It\u2019s called affordable housing, costs you nothing. I think you\u2019re slightly misunderstanding what\u2019s on the table here. What\u2019s going on with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is not trying to get them more money to lend, because they\u2019re actually not lenders. What\u2019s happened is that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have bought and bought and bought worthless mortgages, mortgages from people who can\u2019t pay them back. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are holding assets that are worthless. They have been worthless for a long time. They started playing accounting games in late 1999, in the early 2000s to move these assets forward so that they could show that the asset column of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was going great guns, because these are companies, ostensibly. They are not government agencies. That\u2019s always been a joke. But they\u2019re structured as companies, and they sell stock, they\u2019re publicly traded. The CEO and his executive team wanted to pump up the asset values, they bought all these mortgages that end up being worthless, and right now what this so-called bailout is: to try to peg a market price for what these mortgages are.<\/line><\/p>\n

By the way, it\u2019s not just the mortgages. After they bought up the mortgages, they then used the so-called value to go out and buy other assets. There are so many things involved in this, the derivatives, the credit swaps. Folks, this is deep and it\u2019s entangled, and what\u2019s happened here is that all of these people involved in Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae started buying up worthless mortgages, worthless pieces of paper that the Clinton administration demanded that the banks make loans on, started buying them up, falsifying asset value of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, to pay themselves incredible salaries and bonuses, and they\u2019ve piled worthless paper upon worthless paper upon worthless paper trying to put off well into the future the day it all comes due, and it has. In the process, you had Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns and all these other places that were buying into this whole scam, too. They were buying and they were borrowing against what was worthless. Everybody was living on leveraged debt that you could not survive on. What this bailout is about, if you want to call it a bailout, what the bailout is about is trying to pump enough liquidity, cash into all of this, so that these assets that are worthless have some kind of value. But that\u2019s tricky because right now the market value of them is zero. <\/p>\n

So if you try to set some sort of a value, it\u2019s going to be artificial. And then, let\u2019s talk about the 700 billion or one trillion. Let\u2019s say that they come up with the notion that these mortgages and the derivatives and all these things that are worthless right now, let\u2019s say that they are allowed to sell them added 70 cents on the dollar, better than zero. And then, after that happens, the market sets in, what happens if the market says these things are only worth a dime? Well, then you\u2019re not just talking 700 billion, you\u2019re talking a lot more. So to counter that, some of the wizards of smart are saying, ‘Well, what if the market says they\u2019re worth a buck and a half instead of 70 cents, the taxpayer is going to make out big,\u2019 which is one of the most creative ways I\u2019ve heard yet of people trying to sell. But Fannie Mae, they\u2019re not getting more money to lend to you so that you can go out and buy a house. And don\u2019t worry. There are a whole lot of people here, \u2019cause it\u2019s an election here, trying to make sure that if you have a mortgage that you can\u2019t repay and you\u2019re still in your house, that you get to keep the house. It\u2019s an election year.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: By the way, folks, a mortgage can never be worth more than 100, which is par. I was using a figure of speech, if the mortgage worth a buck and a half. What happened, the way these things will be pegged to value is at an auction. They\u2019ll auction these mortgages off. That will establish what the market value is, but nobody\u2019s going to know what that is until that process actually starts. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

RUSH: Mrs. Clinton this morning on the Today Show today, Matt Lauer. ‘So who would qualify to have their mortgage purchased?\u2019 HILLARY: If you look at what the, uh, model is back from the Great Depression, the Treasury ended up making a profit for the country. That\u2019s why I\u2019ve been proposing this model for months […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nMrs. Clinton's Revisionist History - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/23\/mrs_clinton_s_revisionist_history\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Mrs. Clinton's Revisionist History - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: Mrs. Clinton this morning on the Today Show today, Matt Lauer. ‘So who would qualify to have their mortgage purchased?\u2019 HILLARY: If you look at what the, uh, model is back from the Great Depression, the Treasury ended up making a profit for the country. That\u2019s why I\u2019ve been proposing this model for months […]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125108.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/23\/mrs_clinton_s_revisionist_history\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125108.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125108.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/23\/mrs_clinton_s_revisionist_history\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/23\/mrs_clinton_s_revisionist_history\/\",\"name\":\"Mrs. Clinton's Revisionist History - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/23\/mrs_clinton_s_revisionist_history\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-19T03:20:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-05-19T03:20:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/23\/mrs_clinton_s_revisionist_history\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/23\/mrs_clinton_s_revisionist_history\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/23\/mrs_clinton_s_revisionist_history\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mrs. Clinton\\u2019s Revisionist History\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mrs. Clinton's Revisionist History - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/23\/mrs_clinton_s_revisionist_history\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"Mrs. Clinton's Revisionist History - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: Mrs. Clinton this morning on the Today Show today, Matt Lauer. ‘So who would qualify to have their mortgage purchased?\u2019 HILLARY: If you look at what the, uh, model is back from the Great Depression, the Treasury ended up making a profit for the country. That\u2019s why I\u2019ve been proposing this model for months […]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125108.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/23\/mrs_clinton_s_revisionist_history\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125108.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/01125108.Par.89380.ImageFile.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/23\/mrs_clinton_s_revisionist_history\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/23\/mrs_clinton_s_revisionist_history\/","name":"Mrs. Clinton's Revisionist History - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/23\/mrs_clinton_s_revisionist_history\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2011-05-19T03:20:12+00:00","dateModified":"2011-05-19T03:20:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/23\/mrs_clinton_s_revisionist_history\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/23\/mrs_clinton_s_revisionist_history\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2008\/09\/23\/mrs_clinton_s_revisionist_history\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mrs. Clinton\u2019s Revisionist History"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/911066e449df26406b107ca78cbbde0b","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f18195e0073013fa0e16b040686c2924?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30468"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30468"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30468\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30468"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30468"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30468"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}