She is seriously thinking of cutting her in-laws out of her children\u2019s lives. She says she “refuses to be ‘complicit in the face of racism, sexism, homophobia and anti-Semitism,\u2019 which ‘leads [sic] to far worse things than an awkward family Thanksgiving.\u2019 Her chief complaint? Her in-laws are pro-life, anti-illegal immigrant, Trump-supporting Catholics who once awkwardly tried to express their support for Jews, and don\u2019t enjoy seeing two men kiss on TV.<\/p>\n “Oh, and something about a hateful conspiracy theory involving Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton, who took about 25 trips on Epstein\u2019s ‘Lolita Express\u2019 private jet.” This babe doesn\u2019t want to be reminded of that. She doesn\u2019t want to be reminded that she loves Bill Clinton who was all over Epstein\u2019s girls and his jet. “Her in-laws are pro-life, anti-illegal immigrant, Trump-supporting Catholics who … don\u2019t enjoy seeing two men kiss on TV.” That\u2019s not a good sign for Mayor Pete there. It\u2019s the central focus of his campaign!<\/p>\n She doesn\u2019t want her kids hearing about this “conspiracy theory” involving Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein. Now, let me ask you: In a side-by-side comparison of Hannah Selinger and her in-laws, which of the two is the more normal and sane? I\u2019d take the in-laws any time, any day of the week. Hannah Selinger is a nut! There\u2019s no other way to describe this. These people are all becoming nuts. This preoccupation with racism in America and sexism and homophobia? They have adopted cliches as actual emotions that govern their lives every day.<\/p>\n These people are running around in the midst of several different degrees of guilt trip over a bunch of myths — and being around plain, old-fashioned normal people scares the hell out of \u2019em. Now, how do you explain that? ‘Cause the way her in-laws are described here, it is the essence of normal. It doesn\u2019t sound like there\u2019s any bigotry involved. It doesn\u2019t sound like there\u2019s any ism like sexism or racism or homophobia. But she doesn\u2019t want her “babies” exposed to it.<\/p>\n “[A]pparently grandma and grandpa aren\u2019t too fond of Antifa,” either, it says here, “or Black Lives Matter.” Now, Antifa “consists of black-shirted thugs Hitler could have been proud to call his own…” They could have been candidates for the Gestapo! For the SS! “[A]nd the other is a group,” Black Lives Matter, is exhibiting the very anger that this woman, “Selinger, claims to want to protect her children from.”<\/p>\n Or, better stated: Enforcing the law. Now, to me, the dangerous thing here is… I mean, these people exist and they\u2019ve always existed, but they have this arrogance of supremacy and contempt about them that they automatically conclude that they are the ones who are normal and that they are the ones who are in the majority and that they have the right, not just to disagree with these people, but to go out and destroy them, to impugn them.<\/p>\n I think if you had to boil down the thing that worries me most about the country, it\u2019s not a specific thing. It is what is becoming and what has happened to these formally universally accepted characteristics of “normal,” and now those characteristics have become the definitions of a threat, the definitions of a problem. They have become the characteristics that the left wants to destroy. Now, I understand why.<\/p>\n It\u2019s because the left knows it\u2019s not normal, and nobody wants to run around thinking they\u2019re abnormal. Nobody wants to think that. So these people are weaponizing and attempting to redefine what\u2019s normal with them and their beliefs and behaviors as the definitions, which, okay. But what do they do with people who then no longer qualify? Then there\u2019s out and out punishment! They want to punish these people who always have been the definition of normal because they never were normal in these people\u2019s minds, and it\u2019s time that they essentially be wiped out.<\/p>\n We\u2019re talking — categorize it however you wish — decency versus indecency, normal versus abnormal, healthy versus unhealthy, and there are so many unhealthy people. This is not healthy! You want to take your kids away from their in-laws, take your kids away from their grandparents all because of politics — and these are the people claiming to be the unifiers and those who are tolerant?<\/p>\n That\u2019s the thing that gets me. These are the people that have claimed over and over that they are the ones that practice tolerance. They do not practice tolerance. They practice exclusion! If you don\u2019t bend and shape for them, you are not tolerated, whether it\u2019s in speech or behavior. She is a lifestyle critic — food, wine, travel, and lifestyle writer.<\/p>\n They personalize food so that food itself is a victim. Do not doubt me. Food is now a victim of Trump. Food is a victim of Trump supporters. Trump supporters are so caustic and so discriminating, so insulting that they\u2019re making it even harder for food to grow.<\/p>\n \u201cThe United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released a report Thursday that calls for letting agricultural land return to the wilderness and for people to eat more plants and fewer animals.\u201d And of course so much for letting the people who own the land do what they want with it. That\u2019s not something these people are gonna put up with.<\/p>\n \u201cThe report reiterates the globalist organization\u2019s claim that man\u2019s use of natural resources to improve people\u2019s lives around the world is making global warming worse and will make food more scarce, more expensive, and less nutritional.<\/p>\n \u201cNASA climate scientist Cynthia Rosenzweig, a co-author of the report, said in an Associated Press report, \u2018The cycle is accelerating. The threat of climate change affecting people\u2019s food on their dinner table is increasing.\u201d<\/p>\n So we have here a new way to scare the hell out of young kids and the mentally ill, which is the goal! You tell \u2019em their planet\u2019s not gonna support their life in 20 years or 12 or 10 or 50. You tell \u2019em that people are destroying and polluting the planet, destroying it, doing all these horrible things to animals, you\u2019re scaring the hell out of people, and young people as well and the mentally disabled.<\/p>\n Now you tell them it\u2019s harder for food to grow. It\u2019s harder and harder for people to eat because of climate change. This is not normal. This is not normal. Purposely attempting to manipulate and toy with the mentally ill is not normal. It isn\u2019t healthy.<\/p>\n BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n She said Thursday “the FBI advised her to make her Twitter account private after online critics lambasted her on Wednesday for tweeting that she was ashamed of being ‘white and privileged.\u2019 Arquette, in an exclusive response to TheWrap, expanded on her comments and explained why she is now hiding tweets from anyone that is not among her 90,000 followers,\u201d which is actually kind of, for an actress that\u2019s a pretty low number.<\/p>\n “‘Yes I\u2019m locked to protect myself I was told by FBI to lock it up.\u2019 In her statement to TheWrap, Arquette detailed the \u2018threatening and cruel\u2019 online response to her Wednesday tweet. \u2018There are toxic and very vicious people on social media. Threatening and cruel. I said yesterday the I am ashamed of the color of my skin. I am privileged just because I\u2019m white. I feel shame. Because of all the violence that is happening in America and other racist countries.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n She wasn\u2019t through.<\/p>\n \u201cOn top of being one of the women who came out about [Harvey] Weinstein. The Boy\u2019s Club is bigger than it ever [has been], so the attacks are really actually dangerous right now. But that\u2019s what they want to put me in a state of fear. And I say no. I will not be afraid so I will protect myself and I do have people around me who are ready to protect me if someone goes after me.\u201d So don\u2019t mess with me, even though I\u2019m fragile and ashamed.<\/p>\n Can you imagine being ashamed of what you are and have it be a virtue? What must that do to somebody\u2019s mind? To be ashamed of who you are and at the same time try to make it a virtue.<\/p>\n I don\u2019t know how viral this has gone. Some of you in this audience no doubt will know the name Tommy Lee, the drummer for Motley Crue. Have you seen this? I only want to share this with you as an adjunct to the discussion yesterday. This falls right in line with the discussion we had yesterday on this movie, The Hunt<\/a>.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/APP-PJ-Media-Tearaway-080919.jpg\")
<\/a>“In a lengthy essay for HuffPo on Tuesday, New York-based food, wine, travel and lifestyle writer Hannah Selinger says she ‘can\u2019t just go on pretending that we\u2019re a normal family,\u2019 and that her young children — the oldest is 2-1\/2 — might hear their grandparents ‘say something awful about a marginalized group of people while I\u2019m out enjoying a martini with my husband,'” meaning she can\u2019t leave her babies alone with her in-laws because they might hear some white nationalism, some white supremacy, or racist language, because her in-laws are Trump supporters.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/APP-020918-Trump-Derangement.jpg\")
Now, I would submit to you this is what we are up against. This is an example of what we\u2019re up against. This isn\u2019t rational, it isn\u2019t normal, to want to take your kids away from your in-laws because, essentially, they\u2019re Trump supporters. What in the world is threatening about being “anti-illegal immigration,” for crying out loud? That\u2019s like saying, “I don\u2019t want my kids to be around my parents because they\u2019re in favor of law enforcement!”<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/APP-080819-Climate-Change-GLobal-Warming-HOAX.jpg\")
<\/a>“The United Nations latest climate change report: Saving the planet will require drastic changes in land use and human diets.” I mentioned this yesterday.<\/a> This is the story. The U.N. issued a report saying it\u2019s harder and harder for food to grow. Not harder and harder to grow food because that isn\u2019t true. So they purposely rearrange the words in the allegation, harder and harder for food to grow. As though food has a brain and food has desire and food puts out effort. Food\u2019s really trying to grow out there, but we\u2019re making it really hard on food because of climate change.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Arq.jpg\")
RUSH: Actress Rosanna Arquette \u2013 I\u2019m not making this up — she was in one of the first Madonna movies. She actually played second fiddle to Madonna. I remember she was not happy \u2019cause Madonna was a singer, she\u2019s getting star billing in a movie. Rosanna Arquette was the star, got second billing. She\u2019s probably been mad ever since that happened, I would be.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/APP-080819-Still-THE-HUNT-B.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Tommy-Lee.jpg\")
<\/p>\n