{"id":3544,"date":"2016-04-28T18:13:43","date_gmt":"2016-04-28T18:13:43","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2016-04-28T18:13:43","modified_gmt":"2016-04-28T18:13:43","slug":"don_t_doubt_me_candidates_with_high_negatives_can_win_landslide_victories","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/04\/28\/don_t_doubt_me_candidates_with_high_negatives_can_win_landslide_victories\/","title":{"rendered":"Don\u2019t Doubt Me: Candidates with High Negatives Can Win Landslide Victories"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Listen<\/a><\/p>\n

RUSH: I was watching Karl Rove on the Fox News Channel today, and he was going on and on and on about Trump\u2019s off-the-charts negatives and unfavorables in polling. He said it\u2019s unprecedented, there\u2019s never in the history of American political polling, never been anybody with negatives as high as Donald Trump\u2019s. I\u2019m watching this and I\u2019m thinking something doesn\u2019t make sense here. <\/p>\n

How can you have somebody so obviously popular? I understand polarization and all that. I understand you have some love, gonna have some hate. You don\u2019t want polarization in a politician, though. In some other public endeavors it\u2019s okay. But in politics, nobody\u2019s gonna vote for you \u2019cause they hate you. So it doesn\u2019t work. But I said how accurate can this be? I mean, it almost doesn\u2019t work for me, doesn\u2019t make any sense. Massive unfavorables 25, 30% say they\u2019d never vote for Trump, and yet he\u2019s setting records in terms of turnout and numbers of votes and winning every county in five Northeastern states. <\/line><\/p>\n

So there\u2019s some things that have to, I think, be explained here because I don\u2019t buy this negative stuff as being all that relevant, is where I\u2019m going with this. For two reasons. They never talk about, when discussing Trump\u2019s negatives, how high Hillary\u2019s are. Hillary\u2019s not sitting out there with universal love. Hillary\u2019s negatives are practically as high as Trump\u2019s are, and so are Cruz\u2019s. And then they say, “Well, look at all the people that say if Trump\u2019s the nominee, they\u2019re never gonna vote for him.” <\/p>\n

Well, look at the Sanders supporters who say that if Hillary\u2019s the nominee, they\u2019re not voting for her. And then the same thing Cruz. If Cruz the nominee, some people are not gonna vote for him. So there\u2019s nothing unique to Trump here, is my point. They\u2019re trying to make it look like, you know, certain members of the establishment, certain members of the media, trying to make it look like all of this negative stuff is exclusive to Trump, and it isn\u2019t. Hillary\u2019s negatives are almost as high. Cruz has his own set of negatives. But there\u2019s even more to this. <\/p>\n

You know, pollsters always talk about negatives in a vacuum. They say here are the approval-disapproval ratings of candidate X. But elections are not conducted in a single candidate vacuum. You\u2019re gonna have, “What is your opinion of Trump?” “I hate Trump; I love Trump.” What about Trump compared to Hillary. It\u2019s gonna change. But that\u2019s not how they\u2019re doing the polling. That\u2019s not how they\u2019re doing the reporting. They\u2019re reporting on these negatives for everybody: — Trump, Cruz — as though they\u2019re in a vacuum. <\/p>\n

Otherwise there wouldn\u2019t be this notion of lesser of two evils that\u2019s so frequently applied to politics. But there are, because these polls and these elections certainly don\u2019t occur in a vacuum. Do you know one of the biggest landslides in American presidential history, Richard Nixon in 1972 when he was hated? Richard Nixon was hated and yet he won one of the biggest landslide victories over McGovern in 1972. He was personally unpopular. Eisenhower didn\u2019t like him. The Kennedys didn\u2019t like him. They said he had no class. <\/p>\n

Even Republican people who did like him thought he was a nerd, thought he was socially awkward, and they didn\u2019t like admitting that they were his friend. It\u2019s amazing that Nixon ever won anything because his negatives were always through the roof. Except for one TV appearance Roger Ailes ran in 1968, Nixon had a return, it was one of the early town halls, and Roger Ailes produced it, and it was just Nixon in the round with people asking him questions, and Nixon came off — it was four years before the landslide win — but he came off in that 1968 town hall as personable, likable, unthreatening. It was remarkable. <\/p>\n

I remember, I was 17, I watched it, I remember watching it, I remember being impressed by it. I didn\u2019t know who Roger Ailes was at the time. But I did know later that Ailes had produced that whole thing and had conceived the idea. But the bottom line is in 1972 Richard Nixon was hated. He was hated, you know, Watergate had happened. It hadn\u2019t become anything yet, but I cannot emphasize, for those of you who were not born yet or who were young and not paying attention, Donald Trump\u2019s negatives are nothing compared to what Nixon\u2019s were. <\/line><\/p>\n

Now, Nixon\u2019s polling negatives were not that high, but I\u2019m just telling you, don\u2019t doubt me, he was not liked, the Democrats despised him. That\u2019s why he gave the left so many things like OSHA, tried to buy off their friendship here by giving them a bunch of new government agencies and so forth. The media hated him, too, big. Oh, my gosh, the media hated Nixon maybe more than they hated George W. Bush. But it didn\u2019t matter, is the point, because the mood of the country — see, it wasn\u2019t in a vacuum. <\/p>\n

The mood of the country at the time, McGovern was a Looney Tune. He was in bed with all these Chicago sixties protesters, the Abbie Hoffmans and Jane Fonda, all these weirdos, the Bill Ayerses and these domestic terrorists. The sixties radicals who, by the way, are running the country today. The very people, I mean, their descendants and some of them running the country today, sixties radicals. What McGovern represented, he was considered dangerous.<\/p>\n

<\/a>My point is, \u201972 could teach everybody that high negatives are not by themselves disqualifying. But the anti-Trump people out there want you to believe that they are. And you\u2019ll see it everywhere. Why, Trump can\u2019t win, look at his numbers with women. Why, Trump can\u2019t win, look at his disapprovals. It doesn\u2019t mean anything right now. We haven\u2019t even had the convention yet. We haven\u2019t even had the campaign. <\/p>\n

And I\u2019m gonna tell you something else. You know, in November who knows what\u2019s gonna become of these negatives, after the convention and after the campaign. And I\u2019ll give you a little secret here. If Trump\u2019s the nominee and if he does unload on Hillary Clinton as he\u2019s promising to do, let me just tell you something: You do not know how many gazillion Americans are going to be delirious and orgasmic with delight and support. <\/p>\n

There are gazillions of Americans who have had to suppress, have had to swallow, have had to sit there and take it, whatever the Clintons have gotten away with since they entered the public national scene in 1992. They\u2019ve gotten away with everything, the dirty right-wing conspiracy, all this stuff, and nobody ever goes after \u2019em, nobody ever hits the Clintons, nobody seriously. Republicans have never tried it. They get away with giving $225,000 for a speech, various bankers and so forth. Stealing stuff out of the White House, claiming to be broke, and now just rolling in money and so forth, and all the other unlikable things about her.<\/p>\n

If Trump hits her and criticizes her like the Clintons haven\u2019t been, you\u2019re gonna have people on that basis alone vote for the guy, in my opinion, \u2019cause I don\u2019t think people understand how pent up the frustration and the opposition to the Clintons at what they have seemingly gotten away with all of these years. And I\u2019m reminded of our caller from Philadelphia yesterday, the guy Sean, was going on and on and on about how the Republicans have never fought back. Bush didn\u2019t fight back, and Trump does, Trump fights. <\/p>\n

He said, “You know what? I disagree with 80% what Trump believes, but I\u2019m voting for him \u2019cause he\u2019s a fighter.” Eighty percent. You wonder why the establishment\u2019s going nuts. They hear something like that, and the guy meant it. He was a well-spoken guy. So you can take some of these Trump negatives and you can wipe \u2019em out if he is the nominee and goes after Hillary. And I don\u2019t mean just “Crooked Hillary.” <\/p>\n

I mean, if he exposes this email stuff and Benghazi and her general incompetence and Hillarycare and how she covered the bimbo eruption, all of that stuff, if he goes after that, because nobody ever has, nobody\u2019s ever had the guts, nobody\u2019s ever had the courage to do it because they know the media\u2019s gonna come after \u2019em. That alone is gonna wipe out some negatives. <\/line><\/p>\n

I\u2019ll tell you something else. The infighting between Trump and Cruz has distracted attention from I think the major story that their rise-to-the-top spots here is caused by — let\u2019s not forget what\u2019s driving this whole campaign, and that is the utter registration of the Republican establishment by Republican voters. I mean, it\u2019s known but it\u2019s taken second or third place because the competition now has so tightened between Cruz and Trump and we\u2019re on the verge here of finding out where it\u2019s all gonna end up. <\/p>\n

But the way this all began hasn\u2019t changed, and that is, all of this is happening, Trump exists because he\u2019s anti-establishment. And do not doubt me on this: Washington still does not get what Trump symbolizes. They go after, they say his speech yesterday was empty, it was vacuous, it was silly. Doesn\u2019t matter. He had the great memorable line about not bowing down to globalization anymore. Yeah, he mispronounced Tanzania, called it Tanzania. Well, Obama called it Marine corpse, Obama said 57 states and nobody says anything. When Trump mispronounces Tanzania, everybody harps on it. <\/p>\n

But what Trump symbolizes is a big, fat “screw you” from the country to the people running the country. And that alone is garnering him support that the establishment cannot understand. They still do not understand the depth to which people feel this. And, by the way, there\u2019s a companion story. It is from the Daily Caller. Headline, “Democratic Strategist: Trump Will Beat Hillary Like ‘A Baby Seal'”<\/a><\/p>\n

By the way, Salon.com, the second story this week, Salon.com demanding that the Democrat establishment get rid of Hillary, that she\u2019s guaranteed to lose, she\u2019s got too much baggage, she\u2019s too corrupt, and she\u2019s not Bernie. They love Bernie at Salon. But my point is there\u2019s not total unity out there on the left, on the Democrat side. “Democrat strategist Dave ‘Mudcat\u2019 Saunders,” who I never heard of, but they found him here at The Daily Caller, “believes Donald Trump will beat Hillary Clinton like a ‘baby seal,\u2019 and that working class whites who haven\u00c2\u2019t already left the Democratic Party for cultural reasons will do so now for economic ones.<\/p>\n

Dave “Mudcat” Saunders, not to be confused with Jim “Mudcat” Grant, said, “I know a ton of Democrats — male, female, black and white — here [in southern Virginia] who are going to vote for Trump. It\u00c2\u2019s all because of economic reasons. It\u00c2\u2019s because of his populist message.”<\/p>\n

But there are a bunch of pull quotes I could share with you here about how he thinks — two things — he\u2019s gonna beat Hillary like baby seal, means he\u2019s just gonna cream her in the election, but that he is going to just have at her with oppo research and criticism that is going to be successful. And he\u2019s a Democrat strategist out there. And if that indeed happens, I\u2019m just telling you, some of these negatives out there which are already being looked at mistakenly in a vacuum, are not gonna matter anyway. Ditto Cruz, by the way. Same thing if Cruz is the nominee. <\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Okay. Dave “Mudcat” Saunders was involved in the John Edwards campaign. I recognized the name. He said something very curious here that\u2019s gonna tick some of you off, but I\u2019m just gonna tell you. He thinks that Trump is gonna beat Hillary like a baby seal, he means landslide win over here. And if you read deep into the story, here\u2019s why. Quote, Dave “Mudcat” Saunders: “Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump have very similar messages; they\u00c2\u2019re just dressed in different clothes. I think you\u00c2\u2019re going to see a lot of Sanders people jump to Trump.”<\/p>\n

A Democrat strategist thinks that Trump is gonna win big by getting Bernie\u2019s voters \u2019cause there\u2019s not much difference in his estimation in Bernie or Trump, other than their clothes. <\/p>\n

Dominic, Pensacola, Florida, you\u2019re next on the EIB Network. Hi.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Hey, Rush it\u2019s an honor to talk to you.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Thank you.<\/p>\n

CALLER: I was gonna touch on the Tanzanian industry but you already said that he mispronounced it, so I\u2019ll ask about (unintelligible) poll numbers and the negatives of Trump. You know, you said that it doesn\u2019t make sense that he has such high negatives that he\u2019s done so well, but honestly Rush he\u2019s only done well in blue states. I mean, he did well in Florida which went blue last year, and also the Northeast is blue. But in the red states he couldn\u2019t get 40%, Mississippi being the only exception. I mean, the only states I believe he puts in play are red states, like Arizona, where Hillary is already polling 7% above him.<\/line><\/p>\n

RUSH: There\u2019s some credence to that, but, by the same token, what you\u2019re saying is Trump\u2019s done well in liberal Northeastern states, but in real Republican red states he\u2019s not climbed to 50%. But with Cruz didn\u2019t do anywhere near as well in those states where he was supposed to do well either. That sounds like a dead connection to me but I think we\u2019re gonna find out here in Indiana. I mean, Kasich is there, but he\u2019s not. This is gonna be a good test. Indiana should be Ted Cruz without question, right? I mean, it\u2019s Hoosier, it\u2019s conservative, it\u2019s upper Midwest. <\/p>\n

If you look at Indiana six months ago, as you look at the map, Indiana you\u2019d put in the Cruz camp. You might not now, given the things that have happened in the campaign so far, but it\u2019s made to order for Cruz just in terms of the way you would handicap it. It may not end up being that way. <\/p>\n

Let me try to make this point a little bit differently. I still think it\u2019s fascinating to focus on the negatives of the way people are trying to do it to disqualify Trump. If you take a look at the people doing it, they\u2019re establishment types and they\u2019re doing it in a vacuum. That\u2019s why I went to the pain, the trouble of pointing out that one of the most reviled public figures of his era, Richard Nixon, won in a landslide. The fact that Trump\u2019s negatives are being touted here by the establishment, I think it is significant, and even though they are that high, he\u2019s doing amazingly well and is popular at the same time. <\/p>\n

My only attempt here is to try to talk people out of believing these negatives are that relevant because they apply to everybody. Hillary\u2019s negatives are high. All politicians are kind of looked down on these days by voters. Cruz\u2019s negatives are high. And if you look at some of the early exiters from the Republican primary, their negatives were not high. And where are they? They\u2019re gone. You know, Trump may not a gotten 40%, but some didn\u2019t even get five in some of these states. <\/p>\n

So I know everybody wants to put whatever quiver they can in the bag to say, “I got the bit of information that will prove to you Trump can\u2019t win and we\u2019re making a big mistake.” People did the same thing with Cruz. I just don\u2019t think — it\u2019s too soon. There\u2019s too much yet to happen. Nobody can possibly know what\u2019s gonna happen in November yet, despite what they might tell you.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

RUSH: I was watching Karl Rove on the Fox News Channel today, and he was going on and on and on about Trump\u2019s off-the-charts negatives and unfavorables in polling. He said it\u2019s unprecedented, there\u2019s never in the history of American political polling, never been anybody with negatives as high as Donald Trump\u2019s. I\u2019m watching this […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nDon't Doubt Me: Candidates with High Negatives Can Win Landslide Victories - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/04\/28\/don_t_doubt_me_candidates_with_high_negatives_can_win_landslide_victories\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Don't Doubt Me: Candidates with High Negatives Can Win Landslide Victories - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: I was watching Karl Rove on the Fox News Channel today, and he was going on and on and on about Trump\u2019s off-the-charts negatives and unfavorables in polling. He said it\u2019s unprecedented, there\u2019s never in the history of American political polling, never been anybody with negatives as high as Donald Trump\u2019s. I\u2019m watching this […]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"GeorgePrayias\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/04\/28\/don_t_doubt_me_candidates_with_high_negatives_can_win_landslide_victories\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/04\/28\/don_t_doubt_me_candidates_with_high_negatives_can_win_landslide_victories\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/04\/28\/don_t_doubt_me_candidates_with_high_negatives_can_win_landslide_victories\/\",\"name\":\"Don't Doubt Me: Candidates with High Negatives Can Win Landslide Victories - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/04\/28\/don_t_doubt_me_candidates_with_high_negatives_can_win_landslide_victories\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-04-28T18:13:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-28T18:13:43+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/04\/28\/don_t_doubt_me_candidates_with_high_negatives_can_win_landslide_victories\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/04\/28\/don_t_doubt_me_candidates_with_high_negatives_can_win_landslide_victories\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/04\/28\/don_t_doubt_me_candidates_with_high_negatives_can_win_landslide_victories\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Don\\u2019t Doubt Me: Candidates with High Negatives Can Win Landslide Victories\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4\",\"name\":\"GeorgePrayias\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"GeorgePrayias\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/GeorgePrayias\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Don't Doubt Me: Candidates with High Negatives Can Win Landslide Victories - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/04\/28\/don_t_doubt_me_candidates_with_high_negatives_can_win_landslide_victories\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"Don't Doubt Me: Candidates with High Negatives Can Win Landslide Victories - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: I was watching Karl Rove on the Fox News Channel today, and he was going on and on and on about Trump\u2019s off-the-charts negatives and unfavorables in polling. He said it\u2019s unprecedented, there\u2019s never in the history of American political polling, never been anybody with negatives as high as Donald Trump\u2019s. I\u2019m watching this […]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"GeorgePrayias","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/04\/28\/don_t_doubt_me_candidates_with_high_negatives_can_win_landslide_victories\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/04\/28\/don_t_doubt_me_candidates_with_high_negatives_can_win_landslide_victories\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/04\/28\/don_t_doubt_me_candidates_with_high_negatives_can_win_landslide_victories\/","name":"Don't Doubt Me: Candidates with High Negatives Can Win Landslide Victories - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/04\/28\/don_t_doubt_me_candidates_with_high_negatives_can_win_landslide_victories\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2016-04-28T18:13:43+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-28T18:13:43+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/04\/28\/don_t_doubt_me_candidates_with_high_negatives_can_win_landslide_victories\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/04\/28\/don_t_doubt_me_candidates_with_high_negatives_can_win_landslide_victories\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2016\/04\/28\/don_t_doubt_me_candidates_with_high_negatives_can_win_landslide_victories\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Don\u2019t Doubt Me: Candidates with High Negatives Can Win Landslide Victories"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4","name":"GeorgePrayias","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"GeorgePrayias"},"url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/GeorgePrayias\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3544"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3544"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3544\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3544"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3544"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3544"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}