{"id":6508,"date":"2015-04-24T17:47:39","date_gmt":"2015-04-24T17:47:39","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2015-04-24T17:47:39","modified_gmt":"2015-04-24T17:47:39","slug":"chelsea_defends_the_family","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2015\/04\/24\/chelsea_defends_the_family\/","title":{"rendered":"Chelsea Defends the Family"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Listen<\/a><\/p>\n

RUSH: It is Shawna in Los Angeles. Great to have you on the program, and I\u2019m really glad you waited. Hi.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Hi. How you doing, Rush?<\/p>\n

RUSH: Very well. Thanks much. <\/p>\n

CALLER: Great. Thanks for taking my call. I wanted to talk to you. This morning I was watching the news and I saw an interview that Chelsea Clinton had given in response to the allegation of the upcoming book. I think she was at a conference this week. I didn\u2019t get the details on it. Her response was interesting because she said (paraphrasing), “Well, now that they\u2019re in the throes of this, she finds that now they need to start making things more transparent for the activities of the charity.” And, you know, I found two things really interesting with that. One, I thought to myself, Clinton\u2019s been waiting for years thinking she\u2019s gonna be running, so why now? Why would you think now is the time to start making that transparent? I mean, common sense would give that you would, you know, do this earlier in preparation for it.<\/p>\n

RUSH: No. No, no, no, no, no. Common sense for the Clintons is to keep it covered up forever. Look at what they\u2019re doing. They\u2019re being bribed here.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Well, and that\u2019s a second thing that I thought after listening to the program this morning that you were giving. I thought, you know what, that really is the answer for the Millennial, that is how they get away with it. Because you have to think, well, they are being transparent now, and that\u2019s what the average person is gonna think. Oh, that\u2019s what the clips are gonna see, that\u2019s the only clip that the news shows, now they do think they do need to be transparent. Of course everything is gonna be okay because they realize that they need to be working on that.<\/p>\n

RUSH: With the Millennial population, that is possible. Although, I\u2019ll tell you, I\u2019ve got a poll here in the Hillary Stack, and it\u2019s specifically of Millennials and young people, and an overwhelming percentage of them do not think Mrs. Clinton is trustworthy. Now, the same poll, these same kids do not know who Ronald Reagan is. <\/p>\n

CALLER: Well, that may be the case, it\u2019s true, but that is how they get away with it. The news only shows them that one clip, that one sentence. You know, I\u2019ve got kids in college and they look at that and they see that one sentence and that\u2019s all they see.<\/line><\/p>\n

RUSH: Well, that\u2019s different here, Shawna. That\u2019s what\u2019s different. When you say the news, you may be talking CNN or your local TV news, they\u2019re not covering. But the rest of the Drive-By Media is hammering this.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Oh, this was the morning news, national television.<\/p>\n

RUSH: It is. The CBS morning news, and they are trying to overlook it. Let me ask one quick question about this since you brought up Chelsea. What do you think, Shawna, of the Clintons trotting out their daughter to basically take the arrows on this and to explain it and try to make it right? What do you think of that? Because for the entire time they were in the White House, they told the media: You can\u2019t go anywhere near Chelsea. You can\u2019t talk about Chelsea. Chelsea\u2019s off-limits. Now there\u2019s a little trouble, and who do they trot out there?<\/p>\n

CALLER: Well, I thought it was interesting that Chelsea was giving this speech at this conference from a standpoint of she\u2019s gonna make her own funds, she\u2019s gonna make her own way in the Clinton world. And it doesn\u2019t surprise me that they\u2019re bringing Chelsea into this because, you know, she\u2019s been brought up into that atmosphere, you know, being the good speaker, coming in and protecting the family. It really didn\u2019t surprise me. And also because Chelsea is young. She\u2019s in that young age, and, you know, that\u2019s the person you\u2019re gonna want to bring to get those younger kids to come to the table.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Yeah, all those younger kids can really afford a 10 and a half million-dollar New York home like Chelsea just bought.<\/p>\n

CALLER: Rights, exactly. I mean, she\u2019s not in the realm of the average day common kid. That\u2019s not something they\u2019re gonna be presenting. They are gonna be presenting their daughter, who grew up in the White House, who had to endure all of these things, and yet —<\/p>\n

RUSH: Yeah.<\/line><\/p>\n

CALLER: — here she is, still supporting the family. She understands what you guys are going through.<\/p>\n

RUSH: Yeah, you\u2019re right.<\/p>\n

CALLER: She understands what it\u2019s like to be in your twenties. It is a perfect play, you know, when you\u2019re running for the presidency, if your family\u2019s willing to do that, and, you know —<\/p>\n

RUSH: Well, you talk about Chelsea making her own way, look, I know this happens in a lot of families, I know it does, but still, Chelsea, do you know what her job is? It\u2019s the Crime Family Foundation. Chelsea\u2019s one of the people that\u2019s being paid. Chelsea\u2019s living off those donations. She\u2019s one of the 60% that is siphoning donations off as “other expenses.” That\u2019s where her salary comes from. That\u2019s her job, is living off money given to her parents.<\/p>\n

BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n

RUSH: Here\u2019s Chelsea Clinton. We have Chelsea Clinton audio. This is Chelsea Clinton yesterday in New York City. She was in the Council on Foreign Relations. Do you know what this is? (Kissinger impression) “The Council of Foreign Relations is, of course, the sister organization to the Trilateral Commission which, as you well know, was started by my good friend and fellow conspirator David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski. <\/p>\n

“The Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations together basically run dee verld,” and there\u2019s Chelsea speaking at the CFR, for crying out loud! How old is Chelsea? (interruption) Is she 30 now? Is she that old? (interruption) Don\u2019t bother looking it up. It doesn\u2019t matter. (interruption) I know that she has a child. (sigh) I mean, this… (sigh) I don\u2019t know. I don\u2019t want to get sidetracked here, but the Council on Foreign Relations? Anyway, she\u2019s speaking at women\u2019s…<\/p>\n

(interruption) You\u2019re kidding? Thirty-five? Chelsea Clinton is 35? I guess it makes sense. All right. So, anyway, at the Council on Foreign Relations, during a panel discussion entitled, “Women\u2019s Rights as Human Rights: The Path to Full Participation…” Well, what kind of fools do they think we are? In the other part of town there\u2019s her mother talking at the Women\u2019s Conference of 2015 complaining about women\u2019s pay. <\/p>\n

Here\u2019s her daughter at the CFR at another women\u2019s panel: “Women\u2019s Rights as Human Rights: The Path to Full Participation.” The moderator is Juju Chang. It\u2019s J-u-j-u, Juju Chang, not to be confused with Jar Jar Binks. Juju Chang spoke with Clinton Foundation Vice Chair Chelsea Clinton, during a discussion on the Clinton Foundation accepting money and bribes from foreign governments who have questionable records on women\u2019s rights.<\/p>\n

Juju Chang said, “The Clinton Foundation keeps bubbling up a little bit, and as vice chair, I felt I needed to ask you this. I know that there\u2019s been a rules change in terms of money and donations. But a lot of people have questioned, for example, why did the foundation take money from Saudi Arabia when they don\u2019t treat women as well as perhaps they should?” (laughing) You think? Perhaps they should? “And there\u2019s a question, even this morning in the New York Times, about the money coming from Ukraine, and there\u2019s this question: Were favors done in exchange for funding?”<\/p>\n