{"id":6641,"date":"2015-04-09T16:39:24","date_gmt":"2015-04-09T16:39:24","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2015-04-09T16:39:24","modified_gmt":"2015-04-09T16:39:24","slug":"democrats_use_rand_paul_savannah_guthrie_dustup_to_ignite_gender_wars","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2015\/04\/09\/democrats_use_rand_paul_savannah_guthrie_dustup_to_ignite_gender_wars\/","title":{"rendered":"Democrats Use Rand Paul-Savannah Guthrie Dustup to Ignite Gender Wars"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"\/\/videos\/37\/65482\" target=\"_blank\"><img class=\"alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\" alt=\"Listen to it Button\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Yeah, it\u2019s almost exactly what I was talking about yesterday.  It\u2019s gonna be a great example, and I\u2019m actually glad I didn\u2019t get to it yesterday.  I meant to get to it yesterday but didn\u2019t get to it yesterday so I\u2019m glad that it worked out.  It almost always does work out for the best even when I have a mental lapse.  <\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH: Yesterday on this program we had a call from a woman that launched me into essentially a one-hour series of monologues and explanations.  The woman simply was expressing her frustration with how conservatives and Republicans are lied about in the media and what she wants to see done about it.  I explained to her why she doesn\u2019t see what she wants and why, if she did, it wouldn\u2019t work.  And <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/?p=6647\">I got a little personal and explained my learning curve in all of this<\/a>, starting 26 years ago. <\/p>\n<p>Well, as part of yesterday\u2019s audio sound bite roster I had three sound bites of Rand Paul on the Today Show with Savannah Guthrie.  I had \u2019em ready to go, and I kept moving them, I kept intending to get to \u2019em at some point, then the show ended and I never got to \u2019em.  Well, it turns out they\u2019re gonna work perfectly today with further developments that have happened, and it dovetails perfectly with that which I was discussing and explaining yesterday.  <\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Okay, so <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/?p=6650\">Rand Paul goes on the Today Show yesterday<\/a>, and he\u2019s interviewed by Savannah Guthrie, who is considered this harmless female anchor at the Today Show, when she is every bit the partisan firebrand that anybody else on the left is.  She\u2019s the NBC White House correspondent, or has been. She had her own show on PMSNBC with F. Chuck Todd.  She a radical, like they all are. <\/p>\n<p>My point is there\u2019s nothing in the middle about her. There\u2019s nothing moderate. There\u2019s nothing objective or any of that.  She is a left-wing journalist on NBC, okay?  So Rand Paul does battle with her, and doesn\u2019t accept some of her premises, some of her questions, and talks over her and so forth.  This has caused a controversial reaction.  I was watching Fox News today.  I don\u2019t want to mention any names here \u2019cause all that means is the people I name get hold of me and say, &#8220;No, no, you misunderstood,&#8221; when I didn\u2019t.<\/p>\n<p>So I\u2019m not gonna mention their names. But they had two guests on there: One conservative, one liberal.  The conservative guest said, &#8220;Well, you know, you gotta look at this two ways.  What Rand Paul did with Savannah Guthrie on Today Show, for the base, they love it. That\u2019s exactly what they want to see. The base wants to see these candidates fire back. &#8216;The media\u2019s unfair. The media\u2019s biased!\u2019<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;But &#8212; but &#8212; but the rest of the country doesn\u2019t like it. The rest of the country wants to see somebody with a presidential temperament that doesn\u2019t let the press rattle \u2019em, and in that sense Rand Paul did not help himself.&#8221;  And they cut to the Democrat strategerist who said, &#8220;Are you kidding me?  Are you kidding me? The Today Show, a font of radical leftism?  Give me a break.  It\u2019s bagels and cream cheese and coffee! There\u2019s nothing radical about it.  Rand Paul really hurt himself.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/?p=6650\"><img id=\"eZObject_104527\" class=\"aligncenter\" align=\"middle\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/DRIVE-BY-with-RP.jpg\"\/><\/a>Everybody I\u2019ve spoken to personally think Rand Paul scored and scored and scored again. <\/p>\n<p>You listen to these inside-the-Beltway experts, and they think he blew it.  Let\u2019s go to the audio sound bites.  And yeah, yeah, yeah, we\u2019ll get to some boy.  He really rammed it down somebody\u2019s throat on abortion.  I don\u2019t mean that to sound literal, there, but that\u2019s coming up.  But this is yesterday on the Today Show, and Savannah Guthrie says, &#8220;You are now officially a candidate for president.  Let me ask you about the framework deal with Iran and whether or not you support it.  If a written in black and white exactly as President Obama described it and the Iranians agreed to it exactly as it\u2019s been described, is it a good deal, and would you support it?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>PAUL:  That\u2019s part of the problem.  The Iranian foreign minister immediately came out writing in English saying that it meant something completely different than what President Obama said &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>GUTHRIE:  R-r-right &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>PAUL: &#8212; and so part of the problem.<\/p>\n<p>GUTHRIE: &#8212; but &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>PAUL: Let me answer the question. <\/p>\n<p>GUTHRIE: &#8212; let\u2019s take that issue off the table.<\/p>\n<p>PAUL:  Let me answer the question.  The sincerity of the Iranians does make a big difference, and if they\u2019re immediately saying that the agreement doesn\u2019t mean what President Obama says, that is a big problem.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Okay, now, the way this dovetails with what I was telling you yesterday is that there\u2019s no way Rand Paul is gonna convince her of anything.  There\u2019s no way, when this is over, that Savannah Guthrie is gonna say, &#8220;You know, I\u2019ve been wrong about this guy! You know what? This guy\u2019s making a lot of sense.&#8221; There\u2019s no way that\u2019s gonna happen.  There\u2019s nothing he could do other than announce that he\u2019s changing to the Democrat Party to gain her favor.<\/p>\n<p>Other than that, this is a wasted effort. If the objective here is to try to get the media to understand Rand Paul and what he really means and what he\u2019s really saying, that isn\u2019t gonna happen here.  Do not doubt me.  She doesn\u2019t care what Rand Paul really thinks.  All she cares about is how she can make him look, and how he looks to her is how any conservative or presidential Republican candidate looks. <\/p>\n<p>They\u2019ve got to be taken out. <\/p>\n<p>They have to be discredited. <\/p>\n<p>They have to be damaged in some way. <\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s all that\u2019s happening here.  I mean, look.  The press has been asleep for six and after years.  All of a sudden now we got Republicans who want to be president and they wake up and they start doing their jobs?  This the kind of stuff they should have been doing with Obama for 6-1\/2 years. They don\u2019t even get close to it.  Now we got potential Republican presidential nominees, and now they\u2019re gonna treat \u2019em as suspects!  But I\u2019m telling you.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"MRC TV video player\" width=\"585\" height=\"315\" src=\"http:\/\/www.mrctv.org\/embed\/134660\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>The point is, no matter what Rand Paul says, no matter how nice he is, no matter how brilliant, no matter how persuasive, he\u2019s not gonna change what she thinks at all. That\u2019s not even the mission.  If he thinks that he\u2019s going on here for that &#8212; or if anybody thinks that these people in the media can be awakened, have their minds get right and have new perspectives realized &#8212; that\u2019s not why they even want him there.  They want him there to expose him. <\/p>\n<p>They want him there so that Harry Reid can come out in a couple of weeks and say, &#8220;You know what? I got a friend that told me that Rand Paul hasn\u2019t paid his income tax since he gave birth to his first daughter&#8221; or whatever.  It\u2019s all they want to do.  Okay, so here you heard the first bite. He stands in there and says, &#8220;Let me finish!&#8221;  Then it continued, giving her a journalism lesson (for all it was worth), here.<\/p>\n<p>GUTHRIE:  You once said Iran was not a threat; now you say it is.  You once proposed ending foreign aid to Israel; you now support it, at least for the time being &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>PAUL: Yeah, well, before we go through a litany of &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>GUTHRIE: &#8212; and you once offered to draft to drastically cut &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>PAUL:  Before we go &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>GUTHRIE:  W-w-w-w-w-wait, wait.<\/p>\n<p>PAUL:  Before we &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>GUTHRIE:  Once drastically, duh, wanted to cut defense spending and now you want to increase it 16%. <\/p>\n<p>PAUL: Yeah. Before we go through a litany of &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>GUTHRIE:  So I just wonder if you\u2019re mellowed out.<\/p>\n<p>PAUL:  Why don\u2019t you let me explain instead of jumping over me, okay?<\/p>\n<p>GUTHRIE:  Sure.<\/p>\n<p>PAUL:  Before we go through a litany of things you say I\u2019ve changed on, why don\u2019t you ask me a question: Have I changed my opinion?<\/p>\n<p>GUTHRIE:  Have you changed your opinion?<\/p>\n<p>PAUL:  That would be a better way to approach an interview.<\/p>\n<p>GUTHRIE:  Okay.<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_104534\" class=\"aligncenter\" align=\"middle\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/MediaDriveByMediaLowInfoNewsSoap.jpg\"\/><BR\/>RUSH:  You see, it\u2019s classic here, folks. There she goes. &#8220;You used to think this! You used to think that!&#8221; You know how many times she can say that about Obama?  &#8220;You used to be against gay marriage; now you\u2019re for it.  Have you kind of mellowed?&#8221; She\u2019d never ask Obama that kind of question or even pose it in that way. (angrily) &#8220;You used to be this; now you\u2019re this.  You used to be this; now you\u2019re this.  You used to say that; now you say this.  You used to be this. <\/line><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;What are you saying? What are you saying?&#8221;  There\u2019s no way, folks. I\u2019m telling you, you don\u2019t come out of this well. This is why I banned playing MSNBC sound bites on this program.  No sense in it. It may be that a presidential candidate has to do this.  I don\u2019t think they do anymore but they do.  Anyway, here\u2019s the next one and the final exchange that we had that illustrates the point, and then remember, now, this created a bunch of continued conversation which we will also analyze.<\/p>\n<p>PAUL:  Let\u2019s start out with regard to foreign aid.  If we are going to try to eliminate or reduce foreign aid, why don\u2019t we start with the countries that hate us with that burn our flag?<\/p>\n<p>GUTHRIE: Right.<\/p>\n<p>PAUL: So I haven\u2019t proposed removing aid from Israel, but I still agree with my original precept &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>GUTHRIE:  But you once did!<\/p>\n<p>PAUL:  Let me answer the question.  I agree with my original statement from years ago that ultimately all nations should be free of foreign aid, but my opinion\u2019s not any different than Netanyahu\u2019s opinion.<\/p>\n<p>GUTHRIE:  Do you still think Iran is not a threat, as you said in 2007?<\/p>\n<p>PAUL:  2007 was a long time ago, and events do change.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Now, after all this, F. Chuck Todd came out and ripped him for being mean to the girl.  He did! As though Savannah Guthrie is this delicate little flower, unable to protect herself against this mean-spirited man.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Now, let me just tell you again here, Savannah Guthrie is not a wallflower.  Savannah Guthrie is married, newly married with a new baby. Had to get that done, get it out of the way before biological time bomb went off. She got that done; she\u2019s at Today Show. She married a big-time, active Democrat consultant, a campaign consultant.  She\u2019s not a wallflower. She\u2019s not defenseless. She\u2019s not helpless. She\u2019s not soft and cuddly. <\/p>\n<p>She is a left-wing Democrat activist disguised as a journalist like they all are.  What is happening here &#8212; and if any of you people listening to me have anything to do with any of these to-date announced Republican candidates, presidential hopefuls, I want you to listen to this, because what happened here with Rand Paul and what\u2019s gonna happen to you, is the beginning of the process of changing from race wars to gender wars. <\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_104537\" class=\"aligncenter\" align=\"middle\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/DemocratPlaybook101WAronWomen.jpg\"\/><BR\/>This is happening to <a href=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/?p=6637\">set up Hillary Clinton<\/a>, with the media protecting her. <\/line><\/p>\n<p>With Obama, &#8220;First African-American president! Can\u2019t criticize. Can\u2019t get close to it \u2019cause it\u2019s racist to do so.&#8221;  Rand Paul, standing up for himself on the Today Show with Savannah Guthrie &#8212; not being docile, and not being cordial and sitting there and accepting whatever false premise she puts at him; instead he fought back &#8212; this is now being set up as Rand Paul is representative of the Republicans who hate and do not respect women. <\/p>\n<p>This is the beginning of the process whereby the Democrats and the Drive-By Media switch from the race wars that have been going on to the gender wars. It\u2019s an attempt, in a mild way &#8212; maybe not so mild &#8212; to keep alive (or maybe &#8220;revive&#8221; would be the word) the so-called Republican War on Women.  Now, the fact is, there is no gender war.  There never was a War on Women.  It doesn\u2019t exist.  The Republican Party does not hate women.  It\u2019s absolutely asinine. <\/p>\n<p>But that\u2019s what they are now trying to set up, and that is for the benefit of Hillary Clinton.  They want to have husbands fighting wives by the end of all of this.  Somewhere in the upper levels of the Democrat Regime, the Democrat Party, the message has gone out:  &#8220;Race is out and gender is in because Hillary is a white woman,&#8221; and that\u2019s what this really is all about.  F. Chuck Todd, the first thing he did was come to her defense. &#8220;Oh, a poor defenseless woman!&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Rand Paul, I don\u2019t think that he\u2019s big as she is.  Savannah Guthrie\u2019s like 5\u201910&#8221; or 5\u201911\u2019. I don\u2019t know how tall Rand Paul is, but the idea that he\u2019s in there beating up on the girl on the Today Show, that\u2019s what they want you to believe, and here comes F. Chuck Todd right on cue defending her as a woman under siege, a woman under attack and how unmanly it was, how unnecessary it was. <\/p>\n<p>These guys have the audacity to tell us that they are not biased, that they are not actively engaged in the outcome of events? They insult our intelligence every time they deny who they really are, and it wasn\u2019t just F. Chuck Todd.  Also riding to the rescue was none other than Wolf Blitzer last night on The Situation Room. Rand Paul was over there talking to Wolf Blitzer, and here we go with the War on Women narrative and Republicans hate women.<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_104541\" class=\"aligncenter\" align=\"middle\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/CNNrand1.jpg\"\/><BR\/>BLITZER:  The <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/blogs\/the-fix\/wp\/2015\/04\/08\/rand-pauls-problem-with-female-interviewers-just-cropped-up-again\/\">Washington Post<\/a> has a headline saying, &#8220;Rand Paul\u2019s Problem with Female Interviewers Just Cropped Up Again.&#8221;<\/line><\/p>\n<p>PAUL: Yeah.<\/p>\n<p>BLITZER: Ehhh&#8230; I want you to respond to this suggestion that you interrupt, uh, your female interviewers, that you\u2019re not polite to them.<\/p>\n<p>PAUL:  I think I\u2019ve been universally short-tempered and testy with both male and female reporters. I\u2019ll own up to that, and it\u2019s hard sometimes.  I do think that interviews should be questions and not necessarily editorializing.  I should have more patience, but I think I\u2019m pretty equal opportunity if I get annoyed. (chuckles) I was annoyed with a male reporter this morning. So I will have to get better at holding my tongue and holding my temper, but I think it\u2019s pretty equal opportunity, not directed towards, you know, one male or female.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  All right, now. So, accept the premise in the Wolf Blitzer question and then answer it.  I just don\u2019t understand it!  It is absurd!  We\u2019re all adults, here.  &#8220;The Washington Post has a headline saying, &#8216;Rand Paul\u2019s Problem with Female Interviewers Just Cropped Up Again.\u2019 I want you to respond to this suggestion that you interrupt your female interviewers&#8230;&#8221; What in the world? This is 6th Grade and we\u2019re trying to teach manners?  So, you see, it\u2019s clear as a bell what\u2019s happening here.<\/p>\n<p>Rand Paul stands up for himself on the Today Show, Rand Paul refuses to accept the premise &#8212; exactly what people in the audience here say they want these guys to do &#8212; and look what\u2019s happening.  The media is circling the wagons to defend this poor, defenseless, &#8220;attacked&#8221; Savannah Guthrie. And now presenting the entire idea that Rand Paul hates women, and he really doesn\u2019t like female news babes. <\/p>\n<p>He interrupts \u2019em and he\u2019s disrespectful!<\/p>\n<p>And there you go.<\/p>\n<p>Welcome back, Republican War on Women.  And Rand Paul ends up saying, &#8220;You know what? You\u2019re right. I gotta do a better job.I\u2019m equal opportunity when it comes to my combativeness with the media, and I have to do a better job of letting that be known.&#8221;  This&#8230; If it were me and if I\u2019d put myself in the situation, I wouldn\u2019t have accepted the premise of Wolf Blitzer\u2019s question. I wouldn\u2019t have gone there. I would have blown the Washington Post out of the water.<\/p>\n<p>I would have attempted to humiliate them for not being serious, and I might have thrown in something like, &#8220;Is this why you people don\u2019t have any audience over here?  I am running for president of the United States, and you want to talk to me about how I interact with members of the media who are attacking me?&#8221;  That\u2019s what I would say, but I wouldn\u2019t go in the first place.  This is why I do not accept these invitations that come my way.  There\u2019s just nothing to be gained by it.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s keep going.  Actually, no.  Grab 18 and 19 first here, because this is Megyn Kelly last night on her show, The Kelly File. Rand Paul is there and they\u2019re discussing how he\u2019s dealing with the media, and in particular how he dealt with Savannah Guthrie, the poor, defenseless, angelic, flowery Savannah Guthrie.  Mean, brutish, predatory Rand Paul straight from his presidential announcement, couldn\u2019t wait to come attack poor Savannah.  F. Chuck Todd comes out, defends her honor, and Wolf Blitzer, &#8220;Do you hate women?  Do you have a problem with female newscasters?&#8221;  So it\u2019s over to The Kelly File and here\u2019s how it went there.<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_104538\" class=\"alignright\" align=\"right\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/FOXRand_large.jpg\"\/><BR\/>KELLY:  Chuck Todd came out and said you have to be careful because you attacked two prominent female interviewers.  The Guardian said you were condescending to female reporters, and I, as a female reporter, will say to Chuck Todd and The Guardian: We don\u2019t need your help.  Savannah Guthrie doesn\u2019t need your help.  Kelly Evans doesn\u2019t need your help, and you are entitled to push back on the interviewer just as much as you would if it were a man.  So these male commentaries can butt out.  We can give as good as we get.<\/line><\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  There you have it.  That\u2019s why they hate Fox, by the way.  Here\u2019s Megyn Kelly who, by the way &#8212; he-he &#8212; everything she says here is true.  You do not want to tussle with her.  If you in any way are on the defensive about something, if you\u2019ve done something wrong, you do not want to get near.  She doesn\u2019t care whether you\u2019re male, female, from Mars, Republican, Democrat, it doesn\u2019t matter.  And that\u2019s what she\u2019s saying here.  We can handle it, we can take it, we don\u2019t need all of these male liberals, ahem, defending us.  We can take it and do it and defend ourselves.  We don\u2019t need to be defended, period.  But then she does want Rand Paul to answer for being thin-skinned.  She said, &#8220;The thin skin question, whether it\u2019s a female or a male reporter, that one I say is fair, what do you think about that, Mr. Paul?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_104542\" class=\"aligncenter\" align=\"middle\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/We-Can-Do-It-c.jpg\"\/><BR\/>PAUL:  I think it is, and I mean, to say anything, can I do better?  Yes.  Am I sometimes thin-skinned?  Yes.  But am I equal opportunity?  I mean, I had a tiff with a male reporter today, so it has nothing to do sexuality.  When I think of doing an interview with you, I don\u2019t think whether you\u2019re man a woman.  I think of an &#8212;<\/line><\/p>\n<p>KELLY:  I know that.<\/p>\n<p>PAUL:  &#8212; intelligent person that is gonna ask me questions.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Well, I don\u2019t know how you do an interview with Megyn Kelly and not know she\u2019s a woman, but there\u2019s all kinds.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Okay.  Now to illustrate my example, here\u2019s what Rand Paul did.  And, look, I don\u2019t want anybody to think that this is criticism rooted in &#8212; I\u2019m not saying he\u2019s not qualified to run. I\u2019m not even commenting on his candidacy here.  So don\u2019t anybody infer anything from what I say, \u2019cause I\u2019m not implying anything.  I just want to address a technique that people use when dealing with the Drive-By Media. <\/p>\n<p>They put forth a premise that he\u2019s mean to women. They put forth a premise that he\u2019s unfair and biased against women.  Instead of blowing it out of the park, he accepts it, and then says, &#8220;No, but I\u2019m equal opportunity.  You know, sometimes I interrupt both.  Sometimes I\u2019ve gotta do better.  I have to do better.&#8221;  I don\u2019t know how that helps.  He\u2019s off message with it.  Because, you see, Savannah Guthrie\u2019s feelings weren\u2019t hurt.  She was not offended as a woman.  She\u2019s looking at this as, &#8220;How can I take this guy off message?  How can I get this guy off the rails?  How can I get this guy to look unpresidential?&#8221; and throw this stuff out there.  And after the interview, the judgement is, &#8220;Mission accomplished or not?&#8221;  It\u2019s not, &#8220;Oh, my God, he hurt my feelings. Did you see what he did to me?  He interrupted me.&#8221;  That doesn\u2019t even factor in. <\/p>\n<p>So the idea that Rand says, &#8220;I can do better.&#8221; There\u2019s no reason to say that because it\u2019s not going to change the media\u2019s report on him at all.  They\u2019re not gonna say, &#8220;Rand Paul admitted today that he has sometimes been unfair to women and maybe even men and promises to do better as the campaign rolls on.&#8221;  It\u2019s not how it works.  But, again, look everybody can do this their own way, and can tell me I\u2019m full of it.  I\u2019m just attempting to build on real life experiences, to give you examples of that which I was speaking about yesterday in terms, how do we beat these people back?  How do we overcome the built-in bias and unfairness and whatever else you want to say exists in the Drive-By Media against Republicans? <\/p>\n<p>All I\u2019m saying is, you\u2019re not gonna beat that back by agreeing with them. You\u2019re not gonna beat that back by telling them that they\u2019re wrong in how they\u2019re looking at you.  &#8220;No, you don\u2019t understand me, I\u2019m a nice guy. I love women just as much as I love men.  I don\u2019t have any problem with reporters.  Sometimes I lose my temper but&#8230;&#8221;  That may be effective with some voters, some of the audience, I don\u2019t know.  But it\u2019s not going to change the media perception, \u2019cause the media is not there to like Rand Paul.  The media is there to humiliate him. <\/p>\n<p>The media is there to take him out, just as they are with any other Republican candidate.  If that remains a controversial statement, then we have a long way to go, because, to me, there\u2019s no doubt about it. <\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s go to something else here that\u2019s really, really, I mean, Atta boy positive kind of stuff.  And none of this is a criticism.  I want to be very, very clear again. I\u2019m not being critical. I\u2019m just explaining, giving examples of what I was talking about yesterday and today about this challenge of overcoming the media.  I think Rand Paul\u2019s doing great.  Look at the polling data out there.  He is just blooming in Colorado and Iowa and Virginia.  There\u2019s a <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/campaign-spot\/416695\/quinnipiac-its-virtually-entire-gop-field-running-better-against-her-jim?target=author&#038;tid=814\">Quinnipiac poll<\/a> out there, and Hillary Clinton, the poll says, is wilting.  Hillary is fading away. <\/p>\n<p>Left-wing columnists at The Politico are suggesting her campaign\u2019s already fatally damaged.  She may as well not even get in the race.  You know, it\u2019s tough when you think you\u2019re a fait accompli and something is just a matter of time, it\u2019s automatically gonna happen.  The first thing that comes along that upsets that, people don\u2019t know how to deal with it.  That\u2019s where the Democrats are. <\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_104543\" class=\"aligncenter\" align=\"middle\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/CNNRand.jpg\"\/><BR\/>Okay.  Back to The Situation Room, CNN, Wolf Blitzer talking with Rand Paul about his stance on abortion.  Wolf Blitzer says, &#8220;You were questioned about your stance on abortion rights for women and you said something along the lines, &#8216;Ask Debbie Wassermann Schultz.\u2019 You said &#8216;Ask Debbie Wassermann Schultz if it\u2019s okay to kill a seven-pound baby in the uterus.\u2019  She did respond to what you said. She put out a statement saying, &#8216;Here\u2019s an answer. I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved, period, end of story. And I would appreciate it if you could respond without shushing me.\u2019  Go ahead and respond to her.<\/line><\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s what she said.  Debbie &#8220;Blabbermouth&#8221; Schultz, see how it builds on?  Savannah Guthrie, poor, defenseless, caring, compassionate, infobabe of NBC News, just doing her job. Here came Rand Paul, and he was mean, and he talked all over her, interrupted her. And now the chairman of Democratic National Committee, yeah, okay, here\u2019s what I\u2019d say to him, if I can get a word in edgewise.  So now that meme, that narrative is set.  And there is nothing he\u2019s gonna be able to do to get rid of it.  But, anyway, here\u2019s his answer to the question.<\/p>\n<p>PAUL:  Her answer is yes, that she\u2019s okay with killing a seven pound baby.  But the interesting thing is I understand our country\u2019s polarized on the issue, not everybody agrees on the issue, but even most of my friends who are pro-choice will tell me, they\u2019re not okay with seven- and eight- and nine-pound abortions.  Debbie\u2019s position, which I guess is the Democrat Party position, that an abortion all the way up until the day of birth would be fine, I think really most pro-choice people would be a little uncomfortable with that, so I don\u2019t know.  I really think that she\u2019s got some explaining to do.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Most pro-choice people would not be uncomfortable with that.  That\u2019s why they are pro-choice.  Abortion, first, last, and always. Any abortion that does not happen is a potential chink in the armor of the cause.  Any abortion that does not happen is momentum lost.  It\u2019s a political issue.  Why do you think they stand outside these halfway houses where women are persuaded to go, not to Planned Parenthood, and come in and give birth and put the baby up for adoption?  Why is Planned Parenthood, why are leftists standing outside trying to stop women from making that decision?  Aside from the money, I mean, Planned Parenthood\u2019s getting rich. <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/dailycaller.com\/2015\/04\/08\/rand-challenges-press-ask-dnc-head-if-its-okay-to-kill-a-7-pound-baby-in-the-uterus\/\">Daily Caller:<\/a> &#8220;Rand Challenges Press: Ask DNC Head &#8216;If It\u2019s Okay To Kill A 7-Pound Baby In The Uterus.'&#8221; People go bravo, bravo, throw it back at \u2019em, and he did, and you heard her answer, so forth. <\/p>\n<p>I gotta take a break here because, once again, my friends, the constraints of time are the only thing that can shut me up.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  I think Savannah Guthrie\u2019s in the running to become the nightly news anchor if Lester Holt is unable to hold on.  Look, folks, she\u2019s ambitious like all the rest of \u2019em.  She wants to make news.  She\u2019s not in there to just help you put cream cheese on the bagel the right way as you\u2019re stumbling in the kitchen as you get ready for work in the morning.  Come on.<\/p>\n<p>BREAK TRANSCRIPT<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Try this from CNN: &#8220;Rand Paul Says He Needs to &#8216;Hold My Temper\u2019 After Clashes with Press,&#8221; and here\u2019s more from the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/blogs\/the-fix\/wp\/2015\/04\/08\/rand-pauls-problem-with-female-interviewers-just-cropped-up-again\/\">Washington Post<\/a>:  &#8220;Rand Paul\u2019s Problem with Female Interviews Just Cropped up Again.&#8221;  That\u2019s three different takes from the Washington Post, and all of them have to do with Rand Paul\u2019s problem with women and the media and his impertinent impoliteness.<\/p>\n<p>Dare I say, as they would call it, &#8220;rudeness.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>So here we have polling data that shows that Rand Paul has tied Hillary in Iowa.  And, lo and behold, here comes the Democrat narrative: &#8220;The GOP\u2019s War on Women, and Rand Paul rude and impolite to females!&#8221;  All right, to the phones we go.  Here is Robert in Jacksonville, Florida.  It\u2019s great to have you on the program, sir.  Hello.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Hey, Rush. Longtime listener, first time getting through.  Thanks for taking my call.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  You bet, sir.  Great to question you here.<\/p>\n<p><img id=\"eZObject_104555\" class=\"alignright\" align=\"right\" src=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/randpaul1_large.jpg\"\/><BR\/>CALLER:  Thank you.  You know, I think Rand Paul\u2019s made a big mistake in terms of accepting this premise that he\u2019s, quote, &#8220;thin-skinned.&#8221;  I\u2019m not sure if Wolf Blitzer put it out there, but he definitely mentioned that in the interview with Megyn Kelly.  And he\u2019s missing an opportunity to come up there and explain, you know, and show what true leadership is and what strong leadership is versus the current administration.<\/line><\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Well &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  And I\u2019ll tell you, you know, the liberal media is like, you know, like teenagers.  You know, you gave an inch and they\u2019re gonna, you know, like take the country mile.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Yeah, yeah, I hear you on the teenager bit.  Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha.  Yes.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  (laughing) What I see them doing with this is, they\u2019re gonna keep&#8230; Every chance they can to attack him, they\u2019re gonna keep doing it.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Look, there\u2019s a theory. You know, people that are well-mannered, people that are raised well and are well-mannered&#8230; Like I\u2019ve got a story from yesterday.  I didn\u2019t get to it.  Gosh, I hope I saved it.  It\u2019s about these people that want Mrs. Clinton called &#8220;Senator Clinton&#8221; or &#8220;Secretary Clinton,&#8221; not &#8220;Hillary.&#8221;  It made me think about&#8230; You know, even to this day, I call people who are older than me Mister and Miss or Mrs.  My uncle?<\/p>\n<p>I don\u2019t call him &#8220;Uncle Steve.&#8221; It\u2019s just the way we were received, a sign of respect.  I was gonna do a whole little riff on that.  I\u2019ll find it.  In the meantime, people that are raised well, bred well, have good manners. They have been taught that humility is a personality plus, that\u2019s a character plus.  Being able to admit your shortcomings is sign of being well adjusted.  I\u2019m sure that\u2019s all this is.  I don\u2019t think Rand Paul is trying to persuade the media that he\u2019s a nice guy. <\/p>\n<p>This is just what people with good manners do.  But politics, this is not the place for good manners.  The media are not gonna be impressed by it. They\u2019re gonna take advantage of it if they find it. They may not even know what good manners are.  I would dare say that in America 2015 the whole notion of manners is out the window, pop culture being what it is.  We\u2019re just in one of those cycles where all that stuff, manners and polite, is just old-fashioned stuff.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s old hat, archaic, not hip, and all that. <\/p>\n<p>So I think don\u2019t want to read too much into it.  When he admits that he\u2019s short-tempered, he thinks that he\u2019s actually being positive in the sense that he can admit his shortcomings rather than being a braggadocios oaf and deny that premise.  So I understand it. As someone who was raised well and is well-mannered, I understand it totally, and I\u2019m sure most of you do, too.  You\u2019re just probably saying, &#8220;Well, manners shmanners when it comes to a political campaign, it\u2019s a fight to the death with the Drive-By Media.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>Anyway, I appreciate the point, Robert, and the call very much.<\/p>\n<p>Here is Claudia in Long Island.  Great to have you.  I\u2019m glad you waited.  You\u2019re next.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Hi, Rush.  Thank you for taking my call.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  You bet.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Being a woman is not a disability.  This constant protection infuriates me.  I find it very demeaning.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  You know, it is kind of contradicting, \u2019cause on the one hand, with feminism, women are tough, strong, independent, don\u2019t need a man, don\u2019t need anybody.  And on the other hand, &#8220;Poor Savannah! She was assaulted by Rand Paul,&#8221; and some male journalists had to come to her defense. Then they say pregnancy is a disability, pregnancy is a sickness, pregnancy is some.  So I have no lack of understanding at all about how women could be confused, but I agree with you.  I don\u2019t&#8230; Women are not wallflowers.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  Well, they shouldn\u2019t be. If they\u2019re gonna put themselves out there, then, you know, I don\u2019t want to really be defended.  It makes me look weak. It makes me look incapable. It makes me look like all the things I would not want to look like as I put myself out there.  I am out there to do what I do like I do, and I want to look like someone who can do what she does and do it well.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  Right.<\/p>\n<p>CALLER:  And the minute someone steps in to defend me, it makes me look like all the things I do not wish to look like.<\/p>\n<p>RUSH:  True.  But that\u2019s not what this is about.  She\u2019s gladly sacrificed that for the cause, which is destroying Rand Paul\u2019s candidacy.  She will gladly allow the perception that he was mean to her and that she needs some of her counterparts and colleagues to come in and speak up for her \u2019cause he was so mean.  That advances the agenda.  That\u2019s taking one for the team.  In private, they all know who Savannah Guthrie and what she is. <\/p>\n<p>Look, Savannah Guthrie is a former trial lawyer.  Now, most people know that trial lawyers are not insecure and weak.  And, by the way, she was a trial lawyer for Akin Gump, which is a huge and prestigious law firm with orifices all over the country.  She defended white-collar criminals.  So she can defend herself.  I\u2019m sure she thinks she doesn\u2019t even need to be defended over what happened, but she\u2019ll take it because anything to advance the agenda.  She\u2019ll take one for the team.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>RUSH: Yeah, it\u2019s almost exactly what I was talking about yesterday. It\u2019s gonna be a great example, and I\u2019m actually glad I didn\u2019t get to it yesterday. I meant to get to it yesterday but didn\u2019t get to it yesterday so I\u2019m glad that it worked out. It almost always does work out for the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v17.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Democrats Use Rand Paul-Savannah Guthrie Dustup to Ignite Gender Wars - The Rush Limbaugh Show<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/09\/democrats_use_rand_paul_savannah_guthrie_dustup_to_ignite_gender_wars\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Democrats Use Rand Paul-Savannah Guthrie Dustup to Ignite Gender Wars - The Rush Limbaugh Show\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"RUSH: Yeah, it\u2019s almost exactly what I was talking about yesterday. It\u2019s gonna be a great example, and I\u2019m actually glad I didn\u2019t get to it yesterday. I meant to get to it yesterday but didn\u2019t get to it yesterday so I\u2019m glad that it worked out. It almost always does work out for the [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"GeorgePrayias\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"28 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"description\":\"Excellence In Broadcasting\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/09\/democrats_use_rand_paul_savannah_guthrie_dustup_to_ignite_gender_wars\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/09\/democrats_use_rand_paul_savannah_guthrie_dustup_to_ignite_gender_wars\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/09\/democrats_use_rand_paul_savannah_guthrie_dustup_to_ignite_gender_wars\/\",\"name\":\"Democrats Use Rand Paul-Savannah Guthrie Dustup to Ignite Gender Wars - The Rush Limbaugh Show\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/09\/democrats_use_rand_paul_savannah_guthrie_dustup_to_ignite_gender_wars\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-04-09T16:39:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-09T16:39:24+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/09\/democrats_use_rand_paul_savannah_guthrie_dustup_to_ignite_gender_wars\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/09\/democrats_use_rand_paul_savannah_guthrie_dustup_to_ignite_gender_wars\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/09\/democrats_use_rand_paul_savannah_guthrie_dustup_to_ignite_gender_wars\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Democrats Use Rand Paul-Savannah Guthrie Dustup to Ignite Gender Wars\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4\",\"name\":\"GeorgePrayias\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"GeorgePrayias\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/GeorgePrayias\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Democrats Use Rand Paul-Savannah Guthrie Dustup to Ignite Gender Wars - The Rush Limbaugh Show","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/09\/democrats_use_rand_paul_savannah_guthrie_dustup_to_ignite_gender_wars\/","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_title":"Democrats Use Rand Paul-Savannah Guthrie Dustup to Ignite Gender Wars - The Rush Limbaugh Show","twitter_description":"RUSH: Yeah, it\u2019s almost exactly what I was talking about yesterday. It\u2019s gonna be a great example, and I\u2019m actually glad I didn\u2019t get to it yesterday. I meant to get to it yesterday but didn\u2019t get to it yesterday so I\u2019m glad that it worked out. It almost always does work out for the [&hellip;]","twitter_image":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"GeorgePrayias","Est. reading time":"28 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/","name":"The Rush Limbaugh Show","description":"Excellence In Broadcasting","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/09\/democrats_use_rand_paul_savannah_guthrie_dustup_to_ignite_gender_wars\/#primaryimage","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/listentoit.jpg"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/09\/democrats_use_rand_paul_savannah_guthrie_dustup_to_ignite_gender_wars\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/09\/democrats_use_rand_paul_savannah_guthrie_dustup_to_ignite_gender_wars\/","name":"Democrats Use Rand Paul-Savannah Guthrie Dustup to Ignite Gender Wars - The Rush Limbaugh Show","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/09\/democrats_use_rand_paul_savannah_guthrie_dustup_to_ignite_gender_wars\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2015-04-09T16:39:24+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-09T16:39:24+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/09\/democrats_use_rand_paul_savannah_guthrie_dustup_to_ignite_gender_wars\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/09\/democrats_use_rand_paul_savannah_guthrie_dustup_to_ignite_gender_wars\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/live-rush-limbaugh.pantheonsite.io\/daily\/2015\/04\/09\/democrats_use_rand_paul_savannah_guthrie_dustup_to_ignite_gender_wars\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Democrats Use Rand Paul-Savannah Guthrie Dustup to Ignite Gender Wars"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9a33276eb9dc5b6d3f8218957f30e6b4","name":"GeorgePrayias","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/admin.rushlimbaugh.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d290ab65e2eaca3719268528f83b85bf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"GeorgePrayias"},"url":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/author\/GeorgePrayias\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6641"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6641"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6641\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6641"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6641"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6641"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}