They’re upset that these women are attractive. They’re upset that these are good-looking women. The feminazis ought to be praising these babes. They’ve invaded a man’s world, they’ve taken it over, and used whatever they have at their disposal to get the jobs. That’s the feminazi recipe, but instead of applauding, they’re livid. Female reporters around the country are writing scathing articles about Jill Arrington, who is the NCAA sideline reporter for CBS on Saturday afternoons. She’s the daughter of a former pro football player. Her real name is Tiffany but she changed her name to Jill so they wouldn’t make as much fun of her. But it’s not just Jill Arrington. They’re upset at Melissa Stark, Suzy Kolber and other successful female reporters – all because they’re attractive. They’re seen as sellouts by the feminazis.
Folks, it’s undeniable truth of life number 24, written back in 1987: Feminism was established so as to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of society, and it’s being proven each and every day. That’s what it’s all about, and if it weren’t, you’d see feminists on the side of these successful women. Take a look at the kind of women that the feminazis champion: Donna Shalala, Janet Reno, Martha Burk. Draw your own conclusions. These are the women that the feminazis want us to celebrate as great heroines of the feminist cause who have risen to the top and rule the roost. This codifies and illustrates exactly the hypocrisy of the feminist movement in toto. It’s just so obvious.