RUSH: Obama just said somewhere that he’s going to get all misty watching Mrs. Obama tonight and that he doesn’t want his daughters to see him cry. He’s going to get all misty, which reminds me of a Clint Eastwood movie Play Misty for Me. It was about this killer groupie. Eastwood was a disk jockey in Carmel, California. Jessica Walter played the groupie who tried to kill Eastwood. And Obama now says he’s going to get all misty watching Mrs. Obama speak tonight. I wonder if she’ll ask us: “Are you eating better today than you were four years ago?” Well, what has her reign been about, but food and what people eat.
RUSH: My gosh, folks! Even when I’m joking, I end up being right. I moments ago postulated that in Michelle Obama’s speech tonight she would ask: “Are you eating better now than you were four years ago?” Lo and behold, she did an interview for Parade Magazine (that liberal shill that shows up in the Sunday newspapers), and she was asked the following question: “What do you hope to accomplish in your second term?” And she said that she wants to, quote, “impact the nature of food in grocery stores,” close quote.
She wants to “impact the nature of food in grocery stores.” Holy schmoley! That’s the objective for the first lady, to “impact the nature of food in grocery stores”? If that… That doesn’t even need any comment. Sorry. You can fill in the blanks on your own. I don’t know how you “impact the nature of food.” What the hell does that mean? What’s “the nature of food” anyway? I can understand if somebody asks a question and you say, “Bill, what’s the nature of your question? What are you getting at?” But “impact the nature of food”?
That’s classic liberal gobbledygook speak.