Did They Vote for Buchanan? Losers Say Brexit Ballot Was ConfusingRUSH: (interruption) Oh, yeah, yeah. I’ve heard that. I’ve heard that. Well, it’s predictable. Now the elites and the media are saying that… You know what? I’ve seen seen this on my tech blogs. That ballot was very confusing. It was above the ability of most Britons to understand what they were voting for, really. Have you seen that? (interruption) Oh, get ready for it.
There’s more to come in addition to that. They… (interruption) Yeah, they voted for Buchanan by accident out here in Florida. Remember that? The hanging chads. They didn’t know what… Buchanan. “They didn’t know what they were voting for. It was so confusing. We can’t really trust the result,” which is what they always say here in this country when the vote goes against them.
Business Insider: UK Voters Threw a TantrumRUSH: Business Insider. Is this not always the case? The headline says voters had a “tantrum.” Now what do we do? The headline here at Business Insider: “Basically, Brexit Was a Tantrum — What Should We Do About It?” Which means it wasn’t serious. It’s not what they really think. Kids just… They just had a moment, but, boy, now what do we do? So it’s another way of impugning and discrediting the meaning of the vote.
Flashback: Peter Jennings on the 1994 ElectionRUSH: You know, starting with 1994 when the Republicans won the House of Representatives for the first time in 40 years, Peter Jennings — the late Peter Jennings — goes on his radio commentary on the ABC radio network and says, “The voters,” the children, “had a temper tantrum…” Ready for it? This is actually what Peter Jennings said on November 14th, 1994, during his daily ABC radio commentary. This was not on the ABC Nightly News. Quote, “Some thoughts on those angry voters. Ask parents of any two-year-old and they can tell you about those temper tantrums. The stomping feet, the rolling eyes, the screaming. It’s clear that the anger controls the child and not the other way around. It’s the job of the parent to teach the child to control the anger and channel it in a positive way. Well, imagine a nation full of uncontrolled two-year-old rage. The voters had a temper tantrum last week. Parenting and governing don’t have to be dirty words. The nation can’t be run by an angry two-year-old.”
Parenting and governing don’t have to be dirty words. Whoever said parenting was a dirty word? This is shortly after there had been a presidential debate, 1992, between Perot, George H. W. Bush, and Clinton, and the ponytail guy. I think it was in Richmond. The ponytail guy stood up and asked, “When are you gonna treat us like your kids and start taking care of us?” and Clinton jumped all over it, Bush looked at his watch, and Perot tried to figure out how to kick the guy out.
Clinton walked up to mic (imitating Clinton), “That’s such a great question, you know what, I think about that all the time. I look at this whole room and I see people that I would love to parent. I would love be their father. I think of you in that way. I love all of you like you were my own children.” The place melted, Bush looking at his watch, aw, jeez. And then Peter Jennings.
And now they’re saying this about the Brexit vote. The voters had a tantrum.
Hillary Clinton’s State Department Calendar Missing Scores of EntriesRUSH: It has been discovered that “Hillary Clinton’s State Department Calendar Is Missing Scores of Entries.” This is above and beyond the email scandal. Now, when you’re in government — whatever — a ranking position like a cabinet secretary, your calendar is meticulously kept. Everything official you do is recorded by your office, and it is kept by law as part of the federal record — and “Hillary Clinton’s State Department calendar is missing scores…”
A score is 20. Scores of entries. Which means somebody has gone in more than likely and deleted a number of appointments Mrs. Clinton had from the calendar, and they made the decision, “Look, it’s better to just erase this stuff and then apologize later and say, ‘Oops! We don’t know what happened,’ than to leave them there for people to discover later.”
Peter Schweizer Rips CNNRUSH: Peter “Schweizer Blasts CNN, NBC for Not Investigating Clinton Foundation Cash.” Not only have they ignored his book, they have not investigated on their own the allegations that he makes and the truth that he has uncovered. They’re engaged in a cover-up. I tell you, there’s gonna be a cumulative effect on all of this stuff on Mrs. Clinton. This is not gonna be the free ride to a coronation that everybody on her side has thought this was going to be.
Federal Lab Shut Down for Manipulating 18 Years of DataRUSH: Looky here, folks, from The Daily Caller. “Federal Lab Forced to Close After ‘Disturbing’ Data Manipulation.” The upshot of this is a federal laboratory has been manipulating data on the environment for over 18 years and they had to shut it down. “Nearly two decades and $108 million worth of ‘disturbing’ data manipulation with ‘serious and far ranging’ effects forced a federal lab to close, a congressman revealed [yesterday].
“The inorganic section of the US Geological Survey’s (USGS) Energy Geochemistry Laboratory in Lakewood, Colo. manipulated data on a variety of topics — including many related to the environment — from 1996 to 2014. The manipulation was caught in 2008, but” nobody said anything about it. They “continued another six years” to track it. Some of this data ended up in global warming predictions, climate change analysis and so forth.